United States Archives - Page 6 of 31

Life’s Greatest Mystery: Understanding Americans

*This video was recorded during my backpacking trip through Yosemite in the end of July.

We’re going to group therapy today, and on the docket for discussion is what makes Americans so difficult to understand? Not in a weird accent kind of way, but in a “why are we the way that we are” kind of way.

Yeah we’re all manic depressive, but how did we end up like this? If you look back at US history, there are some clues as to how we got here. The first settlers struggled with the geography of America, but soon discovered vast fertile lands once they trekked into the interior. This led to rapid economic growth and a sense of boundless opportunity (aka the American Dream), that established the national ethos of hard work will always pay off.

This overly optimistic and often unrealistic worldview in the states isn’t seen most places. Take Canada for example – the harsh landscape within Canada led to a more passive-aggressive national character. Or Australia – the barren outback meant that they had to develop strong external relationships to thrive. Each of these countries’ ethos is unique and contributes to much of the miscommunication that happens throughout the world.

The US also has a quirk in which we overreact to crises. The launch of Sputnik by the Soviets led to a complete overhauling of American industry and education. 9/11 led to the US asserting its power globally. This is a blessing and a curse, and you don’t know how it will end up until years down the road.

So, rules of engagement for understanding Americans, just treat us like teenage girls…

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hey, everybody. Peter Zeihan here, coming to you from upper Spiller Canyon in Yosemite. Just in front of me is Horse Creek Pass, which sucks. Anyway, this is Spiller Canyon behind me. That’s much better. We’re doing a number of videos while I’m out backpacking. This one, we’re going to talk about why Americans are so manic-depressive or, as most other countries refer to it, why Americans are batshit crazy.

It has to do with geography. When the original settlers started laying claim to the eastern seaboard of what’s now the East Coast of the United States, we were just another colony. Even when the United States got its independence, its opportunity for growth was very limited. You basically had a thin coastal strip that wasn’t even particularly well connected.

And there was the Chesapeake Bay right in the middle, which was valuable. But if somebody, as in the War of 1812 kind of thing, took over Baltimore, it cut the United States in two. So we discovered that Americans had a very regional approach to everything until we started penetrating inland. Part of the Treaty of Paris gave the United States the eastern side of the Mississippi Basin, basically up to the Appalachians, and then later the Louisiana Purchase, which gave us the western side.

This was a major change, one that has shaped America’s mindset ever since. As people took the National Road and entered the Ohio River Valley, they soon found out that these were the best farmlands on the planet, overlaid by the largest natural navigable waterway system in the world, just right on top of each other.

Anyone, for the price of a Conestoga wagon, which in modern times is like $14,000, could basically go out to this interior zone and within eight months be exporting grain through New Orleans for hard currency. This lasted for five generations, with the notable interruption of the Civil War.

For five generations, Americans found more and better lands. They got richer, and there were really no security concerns from their point of view. You do that for 150 years, and you develop a series of national ethos and mythos. For the United States, that mythos was that the world is ultimately a kind place, and that you just have to work hard, and security will take care of itself, and wealth will take care of itself, because that is what we knew for 150 years. But, as we have all learned, that is not how the world actually works.

From time to time, the world reaches out and punches you in the face. And for Americans, who went for five generations without a serious adjustment, well, we lose our minds because we become convinced that the covenant with God has been broken and that our days are over. We start a panicked recreation of everything about ourselves in a desperate attempt to survive.

Now, is this an overreaction? You betcha. But does this have an upside? Absolutely. Because if you respond to negative stimuli with reinvention, then the sky is the limit. Let me give you a few examples. The quintessential one is Sputnik. Let’s be honest here. It was a beeping aluminum grapefruit.

The Americans were ahead of the Russians at the time in rocketry, metallurgy, and electronics. But because the Russians were able to launch something that went beep, beep, beep, beep, beep, we lost our shit and completely overhauled our industrial base. We completely overhauled how we handled public education, and we then coasted on those advantages for the next 50 years.

9/11 is another really good example. It was a tragedy by any measure. I don’t mean to talk people out of that, but as a side effect of the War on Terror, Americans ended up at the sharp end of American power, striding every major waterway on the planet, something we have yet to use.

When that time comes, all the hard work is done. Vietnam is another great example. We lost a war to a post-colonial power that was a rice producer, and we were the world’s largest rice exporter at the time. As a side effect of our reaction to Vietnam, we took about a decade off, and we completely overhauled our defense industry, marrying technology to our weapons systems in what has become known as the revolution in military affairs.

That gave us everything from satellite communications to cruise missiles to drones. Our reaction, our overreaction, to stimulus is one of our great advantages, but it does mean we’re a little “whoo-hoo” when we’re dealing with the diplomatic side of things. When something goes down that we think is too much, we have to remake everything.

Now, our closest cultural cousins, the Australians, the New Zealanders, and the Canadians, have something similar to this. Let’s start with our Canuck neighbors. Actually, the Canucks and the Australians both, unlike the American settlers who found more and better lands, the Canadian and Australian settlers basically found a dead heart.

The Aussies found the Outback, which, you know, may be good for mining, but it’s certainly not good for the average person to start anew. And the Canadians found the Canadian Shield, which is forested land with a broken crust where you might be able to mine, but you’re never going to farm. So they had a very different approach.

In the case of Canada, this is where the passive-aggressiveness comes from because they’ve always seen the country to their south doing very, very, very well with absolutely no planning. With the Australians, this is why they have a tendency to be very, very forward-thinking because they know that at the end of the day, their capacity to leverage their own geography to achieve success is somewhat limited. So they have to have good relations with someone else. It used to be the United Kingdom; now it’s definitely the United States.

And then there are the Kiwis. They have a situation somewhat similar to the United States in that they pushed inland and found more and better lands, especially relative to the size of the country. But there was one big difference between New Zealand and the United States: New Zealand’s remote. The Americans have a massive coastline on two ocean basins.

So, you take the size of the United States and combine it with its resources, of course, it’s going to be a global power, which is one of the reasons why we get punched in the face every once in a while. The New Zealanders never had that.

The Kiwis could exist in a degree of splendid isolation should they really choose to, and as a result, they kind of have all the upside of what goes on in the American mind, but none of the downsides, because, you know, the last time that there was a war on New Zealand shores, you have to go back to like the 15th century.

I think that’s the 15th, 16th, 13th, mid-18th century when the Maori settled there in the first place and went to war with the natives who were already there. The result is a very, very different political culture. Okay, that’s it for me. I will, that’s my next stop. I’ll see you guys there.

Could Jet Ski Bombs Change the Way Navies Operate?

*This video was recorded during my backpacking trip through Yosemite in the end of July.

The US Navy and its fleet of carriers (and super-carriers) haven’t had much of a challenge on the seas since WWII. But of all things, it might be some low-tech jet ski bombs that change the way the world’s navies operate.

As the Ukraine War evolves, we’re seeing warfare innovations that could reshape all future conflict. This has come in the form of modified speedboats and jet skis with bombs, used to disable Russia’s Black Sea Navy. And other countries are starting to take note.

For countries with constrained naval access points, this could spell trouble; think of regions like the Black Sea and Baltic Sea or countries with punchy neighbors like Israel and Turkey. These innovations are low-cost and accessible to just about everyone…even worse, they’re difficult to defend against with current tech. So, how does this look for the major naval players?

China is vulnerable to attack from smaller countries due to their port locations. For the US, UK and Japan, there’s less concern given their geographies and strategic partnerships. However, everyone should be updating their defense systems and working to handle this new style of water warfare.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hey, everybody. Peter Zeihan here, coming to you from Yosemite. Really doesn’t matter beyond that because I’ve been pushed into my tent by some Thunder boomers for the last hour anyway. Thought I’d use the wet as an excuse to talk about the future of movies around the world. Since World War One—really, World War Two—the carrier has been the backbone of everything that matters, largely because they can project power. More conventional ships like, say, battleships have to get into engagement range, which is, you know, measured in miles or tens of miles, whereas a carrier can launch fighters and fighter bombers from hundreds of miles away and never be in danger itself.

That’s why the Soviets invested so much in trying to break through the American carrier perimeter with things like airlines, cruise missiles, or submarines to questionable effect. But anyway, that was the goal. Now, for the last 30 years, the United States has been the only game in town. It’s not just carriers the United States has. It has supercarriers. It has ten of what most countries consider carriers, which are the core of the Marine expeditionary units, and then another ten of the Nimitz class carriers, which are the ones that, you know, outshoot everybody. One of those has more projection-based firepower than every other navy in the world, with the exception of the Japanese and the British navies, who are allies anyway. So, big difference. And then, of course, the United States is in the process of floating three Ford-class carriers, which will be even more powerful. So, from a conventional naval point of view, the United States is in a league of its own. Might as well be on its own planet. The question is whether that is changing.

One of the things that we have seen in the Ukraine war is that the Ukrainians have been able to modify speedboats and literally jet skis with remote controls, put a couple hundred pounds or 500 pounds of bombs on them, and send them off. In doing so, they’ve basically sunk or incapacitated the vast majority of the Black Sea navy of the Russians. It’s actually worse than it sounds because the Russians moved a lot of ships into the Black Sea just before the war, and those are all gone too. So recently, the Russians abandoned the port of Sevastopol. Basically, they’re not having naval assets in the Crimean Peninsula anymore. They’ve moved everything back to Novorossiysk. But the Ukrainians have already hit Novorossiysk, so they’re probably going to have to move it back to Tuapse, or maybe even Astrakhan. Basically, the Russian Black Sea Fleet is no more. It’s no longer a fleet in being. It no longer has the capacity to project power, and it’s basically hiding in its supposed home waters. Say what you will, but the Ukrainians are creative, and they’re working with very, very little. There’s not much about these naval drones that is particularly sophisticated; we just haven’t seen them patched together like this before. So, to think that this technological innovation is going to stop just in Ukraine is kind of stupid.

So you need to look around the world for other navies that really shouldn’t exist much longer because if they get in a shooting war with a neighbor, all it’s going to take is a few non-dudes on jet skis, and they’re gone. The country that is going to suffer the most from this is Russia. All of Russia’s maritime access points where it has naval ports are contested. I mean, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, it’s got that really, really, really crazy long Arctic coastline, but hardly anyone lives there, with the exception of Arkhangelsk and Murmansk, which are the bases for the Arctic Fleet. And both of those are within jet ski range of Norway. Saint Petersburg and the Baltic Sea Fleet are even more constrained. Anything that wants to operate there has to get by Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Sweden, Denmark, Poland, and Germany. So yeah, not happening. The only other remaining base is out in Vladivostok, where the Russians are completely circumscribed by the Japanese islands. So, you know, any meaningful conflict involving any of these theaters, and the Russians lose it all very, very, very quickly to jet skis. I mean, that’s just embarrassing. The Russians have never been a naval power because all of its navy points are constrained, and one fleet can’t really reinforce the other, but still, this is just a little over the top.

They’re hardly alone. Basically, there are a lot of countries that are near one another, they don’t like one another, and getting a few motorboats or jet skis together to throw things out of whack is a really good plan. So, for example, if the Israelis and the Turks don’t find a way to get along, both of them can largely decimate the regional navies. This is a bigger problem for Turkey because it’s on the Black Sea, and that means it has to have good relations with not just the Russians and the Georgians, but the Romanians and the Bulgarians. And of course, then there’s the Greeks. The Aegean Sea is probably going to be a no-go zone for the Turkish Navy, which basically makes it really important for the Turks to get along with Israel. Otherwise, they won’t have a navy at all.

But the real fun starts in the Persian Gulf, where Iran, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Oman can basically, whenever they want to, bomb each other’s navies. Not that any of them have navies, but it’s a commercial thing. All of these countries are dependent upon the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz to get crude out, and now it takes really, really low-tech stuff to interrupt it. But the real, real crazy exciting stuff is going to happen in East Asia because every Chinese port is on the wrong side of the first island chain. That’s the line of islands going south from Japan to include Taiwan, the Philippines, and Indonesia. I would look to Indonesia and the Philippines to really explore these technologies because they’re not naval powers, but anyone can buy some bombs on a jet ski, and all of a sudden, all this money that the Chinese have been investing in their navy is completely pointless.

Now, of course, if you’re talking about the big three navies in the world, that’s the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom. Those are the three big naval powers. The game might be a little different. One of the reasons why these three countries are the world’s biggest naval powers is because of their positioning. Obviously, Japan and the United Kingdom are islands, so they have to have a navy, and then the United States is basically on a continent more or less by itself from a strategic point of view. Well, in the case of Japan, all of its ports are on the east side of the island, so they’re out of jet ski range. For the United Kingdom, as long as they get along well with Norway, Denmark, and France, there’s nothing to worry about there, and that’s one of the many reasons why NATO tries to keep an eye on all of these relationships. And to be perfectly blunt, the French and the Brits—there’s a lot of bad water under the bridge there, but they’re not about to go bombing one another, and the Danes, the Norwegians, and the Brits have gotten along well for centuries, so that’s probably okay.

There’s still the open question, though, of where can you operate? Just because you can get your ship out of port doesn’t mean you can do anything with it because if you come in range of a foreign coastline, the jet skis may very well come out. So we’re going to have to see a counter-revolution in naval technology here. I don’t want to go so far as to say the age of the supercarrier is over because those things are really tough to sink, and they are really fast, and they are really useful. But if someone’s coming at you with a fleet of jet skis, you don’t have the right weapons for that. There’s nothing on the ships or even in the ring of ships that supports them that can shoot down at an angle to engage these things, so we’ll need something new.

Now the Navy is working on something called the Replicator initiative, which isn’t simply going to field a bunch of drones; it’s going to turn all of the major surface combatants into drone manufacturing centers, so they can kick out dozens of these things in a few hours, is the theory. And if that happens, you get some serious drone-on-drone action. While using a jet ski against a capital ship is a big bang for your buck, using a small drone against a large drone is an even bigger bang. So, according to the Navy, within two years, Replicator should be online, at least in a prototype fashion. We’ll see what it looks like then. It’s all a question of whether or not the existing naval powers can innovate at the speed that the upstarts are. I can tell you this for sure: they’re putting a budget behind it because they don’t want to lose those big boats.

All right, that’s it for me. Until next time.

US Border Crossings: Is Mexico the Solution?

It’s time that we discuss the situation at the US – Mexico border. What’s going on and how is it all going to shake out?

Over 2 million people crossed the border illegally last year. Crossings appear to have been decreasing over the past six months thanks to executive orders by President Biden (although, they were first part of a Republican proposal). While these crossings might be happening via Mexico, the majority of those entering the US illegally are not Mexican.

These migrants are coming from Central American countries like Honduras and Nicaragua, as well as countries like India, Russia and China. While some of these people used to enter legally, policy changes have forced them to cross via more illicit means. Physical barriers can only do so much in preventing these crossings, so it may be time to explore political solutions.

Since most of these migrants are entering through Mexico, that should be the first line of defense. Discussions between Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (Amlo) and President Biden have led to positive trends in managing border crossings. However, this issue is constantly evolving and will require much more than a big wall and soft handshakes to sort out.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hey everybody, Peter Zeihan here, coming to you from hot and smoky Colorado, where we’re finally getting some much, much, much needed rain to put out the forest fires that are way, way, way too close. Anyway, I’m back for a couple of days, so I want to give you an update on what’s going on at the border.

Now, as we all know, over 2 million people crossed illegally last year. Whether that’s good, bad, or indifferent depends on your politics. From a rule of law point of view, it’s questionable at best. Politically, it’s untenable. But economically, if it hadn’t happened, we’d probably have 10% inflation because of labor shortages. So, pick your poison—what problem do you want to embrace, and which one do you want to work against?

Now that we’re into August, there are two big things going on. First of all, the number of apprehensions at the border has been steadily dropping for the last six months. This is largely due to a package of executive orders that Joe Biden enacted a few months ago. These include summary expulsions and much stricter rules on asylum. These measures were part of a Republican-sponsored project earlier this year to remake the border. The Democrats were forced into it, but then Donald Trump thought this would be a victory for Biden, so he told his allies in Congress to scuttle the deal. In response, Biden went ahead and imposed the Republican ultimatum as a series of executive orders. I don’t want to say it’s working—it’s too soon to know for sure—but tensions at the border have dropped by roughly a third during this time. We’re well below the high levels of detentions and crossings from last year, and preliminary data for July and August suggests that trend is continuing.

The second thing is that folks from beyond Central America are now making up a larger and growing group of those crossing the U.S. border. Remember, the majority of people crossing were from the failed or nearly failed states of Honduras, Nicaragua, and El Salvador. But now, there’s a significant number coming from other places, especially India, Russia, and China. These are people who used to come to the United States legally, but due to the lack of immigration reform through the Obama, Trump, and now Biden years, most legal pathways for immigrants have been closed. So now, people are just coming illegally, which means different tools are being used to regulate the flow.

Specifically, Biden has had a series of deep conversations with his counterpart in Mexico, President López Obrador (AMLO). Behind the scenes, they’ve quietly cut a deal where Mexico acts as the first line of defense. This makes it more difficult for people from those failed states to travel north. Once they get to the northern border, they’re put on buses and shipped back to the southern border. Secondly, Mexico is no longer accepting third-party visas for would-be immigrants coming from places like China. It used to be that you could fly from China to Mexico City and then come up, but not anymore. Now, they’ve been flying to places like Ecuador and trying to connect through to Mexico, but that doesn’t work anymore either. So, they’re trying to go through Bolivia or Africa, but now the Mexicans are saying unless you have a year-long multi-entry visa for all the countries on your trip, we’re just going to ship you back. This means all the countries where they used to start, like Korea, Japan, Vietnam, or Russia, are now having to take deportees on flights from Mexico City.

None of this would have been possible without having a conversation with AMLO. And AMLO is a difficult guy to have a conversation with—just ask Donald Trump. He banged his head against the Mexican administration for a couple of years early in AMLO’s reign. It hasn’t been any easier for Joe Biden, but after a fashion, we have the beginnings of a deal.

Will it work? For the moment, things are trending in a positive direction if you want to keep the border closed. But keep in mind, this border is 2,000 miles long. Even if the United States were to deploy its entire military to the border, that’s only enough people for one dude every 50 feet, assuming no one ever takes a break or sleeps. So, there has to be a political angle to any sort of border management. Simply building a wall won’t work because, as we found out in the early years of the Trump administration, if you can quadruple your income by using a ladder, well, you’re going to use the ladder. The wall hasn’t done much to inhibit people from crossing illegally.

However, a political deal, like the one we saw between Trump and AMLO and now between Biden and AMLO, which turns all of Mexico into a kind of a wall—that works a lot better.

Alright, that’s it for me. Take care.

China’s Tariff Wars: The EU Opens a New Front

*This video was recorded in June of 2024.

We’re talking about a different kind of war today – Trade Wars. Specifically, we’ll be looking at attempts by the US and EU to limit Chinese involvement in their electric vehicle markets.

With 100% tariffs from the US and around 50% from the EU, the Chinese EV industry is being backed into a corner…and its only going to get worse. China’s retaliatory measures are limited by their dependence upon foreign imports and attempts to restrict exports of other materials like gallium have backfired. Heck, the Chinese even tried to slap some tariffs on bacon.

China’s myriad of other issues (demographics, post-COVID decline, low value add, etc.) have only exacerbated the problems brought about by these tariffs. The semiconductor industry is a good example of the inefficiencies in the Chinese system and how reliant on foreign expertise it is.

Don’t get me wrong, China is the world’s manufacturer and that’s no small thing, but its dominance will be challenged by these ever-growing wars on trade.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hey, everybody. Peter Zeihan here, coming to you from the top of Frazier Peak in New Mexico. Back behind me, you can see Mount Walter and just a little bit of Wheeler.

Today, we’re going to talk about trade wars shaping up with the Chinese and why the Chinese don’t have too much leverage. The issue is that the United States and the European Union have both put heavy tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles—100% in the United States, about 50% in the case of Europe.

This is just the first round. Expect these tariffs to at least double over the next couple of years. The goal is to keep everything that involves any part of a Chinese EV out of the system, starting with the finished vehicles. This will extend to parts and especially batteries in the near future.

This is the beginning of the process, not the end. Regardless of what you think about electric vehicles, there’s a belief in the governing systems of both the U.S. and the EU that this is the future, and they don’t want another country or economic bloc to dominate it. Obviously, there’s a lot of subtext there, but that’s the core of the issue.

The Chinese are looking for things to retaliate against. The problem is, when you’re a major manufacturing country that imports all of your raw materials and relies upon foreign markets for all of your sales, there’s not a lot you can do. If you impede trade, you’re destroying the trade system you rely on for your economic model.

The demographic situation in China has gone from bad to horrific. Since the beginning of Covid, we’ve discovered that not only did they overcount their population by well over 100 million people, but people have aged out of the block that does most of the consumption.

We only got our first decent look at Chinese demographics a little under a year ago. The Chinese are now starting to understand why retail sales have not rebounded post-Covid—they’re not going to rebound because they no longer have enough people to generate a rebound. So, foreign sales are all they have. China is also not the technological leader, which means it can’t withhold technology from its trading partners to get market access.

So, the question is, what can they reach for? In the United States’ case, if you retaliate with tariffs on anything, it immediately triggers a second round of tariffs on you, which hurts you more. Even with things where the Chinese might seem to have an advantage, like gallium and germanium (two rare metals they dominate in production), they restricted access to Japan and the U.S. after previous sanctions rounds. The problem is, these metals are just byproducts of aluminum manufacturing. The U.S. is getting back into aluminum smelting, solving that problem, and leaving China without leverage.

In Europe, this is the first significant trade dispute between the EU and China, and it’s not likely to be the last. Europe is known as Fortress Europe for a reason, and China is ripe to be cut out of the European market. Right now, however, the Chinese don’t feel the same danger in doing retaliatory tariffs against Europe as they do with the U.S. The problem again is finding leverage, and they’ve gone after pork.

Back before Covid, China was hit by a massive outbreak of African swine fever, decimating their herds. America and other swine exporters stepped in to fill the gap. Then, the Trump administration cheesed off the Chinese government, leading China to decide to never buy American foodstuffs again unless there was no other option. They switched to European supplies for pork, mainly from Denmark, Spain, and to a lesser extent, Italy.

Fast forward a few years, and China’s swineherd has recovered, creating overproduction. Now, they’re sticking it to the Europeans on pork. It’s not nearly as impactful as targeting semiconductors, but the Chinese don’t have much leverage there either.

No one makes high-end semiconductors by themselves. Making chips better than 28 nanometers involves over 9,000 firms globally. China can make chips of about 90 nanometers, suitable for smart light bulbs, but anything more sophisticated requires significant outside help. The idea that having a fab plant means you can run with it is false. It takes a village for specialty chemicals, design work, and lithography.

If the Chinese ever find something to retaliate with, the EU and U.S. can hit back in ways that impact core Chinese interests very quickly. This leaves the Chinese with limited options, like going after pork. Unless you’re raising pigs in Spain, this isn’t a big deal yet. Sooner or later, Chinese demographics will cause their system to collapse, revealing how much of the lower-end manufacturing the rest of the world can do without. China is the workshop of the world for mid to low-quality products and the king of assembly, but that’s not the tool you use to fight a trade war.

A Crack in the North American Drug War

An image depicting cocaine in lines, a card credit, and bill rolled up

I’m back home from Yosemite on a brief intermission to my summer backpacking trips, and wanted to issue an update on the Mexican Cartels. Specifically, we’re talking about the arrest of Sinaloa leader, El Mayo.

El Mayo is one of the heavy hitters in the Sinaloa cartel, known for being the logistics and money guy under El Chapo. This past week, he was mislead by one of El Chapo’s sons to enter the US, where he was immediately arrested.

This shakes things up for the Sinaloa cartel, but what will the fallout be? Well, you can expect lots of violence as different factions compete in this newly developed vacuum. I wouldn’t expect any lags to your drug supply though, but don’t get too excited, as this gives the US more insight to ultimately dismantling the cartel’s operations domestically. If I was the shot caller, I probably would have gone after the leader of the Jalisco New Generation cartel – El Mencho – but hey, I’m not complaining.

Oh yeah, if you we’re hoping for an update on the US political situation…nothing has really changed in my book. Just a different name on the ticket.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hey, everybody. Peter Zeihan here, coming to you from smoky Colorado. We’re definitely in the depths of fire season here; in fact, there’s a forest fire about five miles that way. No stress. Anyway, I’ve been gone backpacking for a couple of weeks, and I’m about to disappear again, so I figured I’d take this opportunity to update you on what has gone down while I’ve been out.

I’m sure lots and lots and lots of you have a long, long list of things you want me to update you on, but there’s really only one thing that I saw that happened that really requires giving you guys the lowdown. That happened in Texas and Mexico last week when a guy by the name of Ismael Zambada, also known as El Mayo, the titular head of the Sinaloa drug trafficking coalition in Mexico, got on a plane, flew to Texas under false pretenses, and was promptly arrested.

Quick background: the Sinaloa cartel is not simply the most powerful drug trafficking organization in Mexico; it’s the most powerful one here in the United States. In fact, it’s the largest organized crime group in the world. The reason it got into that position is because of its previous leader, a guy by the name of El Chapo Guzmán.

El Chapo ran the cartel like an American or Korean conglomerate. The idea was that they were all on the same side—don’t shoot at each other, don’t engage in petty larceny, things that would anger the population. Instead, they branched out into affiliated industries on the side—not just cocaine, but also marijuana, heroin, maybe a little bit of light kidnapping and human trafficking, and even local government, transport, agriculture, and tourism. Anything you could launder money with. He ran it as an institution, which kept the violence rate within his organization relatively low and minimized clashes with local governments. This allowed him to take the Sinaloa cartel to dizzying heights.

The United States named him public enemy number one, and eventually, in a series of operations, we got him. Then he escaped, and we got him again. Now he’s serving a life sentence in some dark hole in the United States. His successor is El Mayo, recently arrested. El Mayo is best known as El Chapo’s accountant. He knows where all the bodies are buried, how the institutions run, who the key players are, where the money flows, and how it’s laundered. So, big win. It’s also noteworthy how he was captured—not a DEA or FBI operation, but a setup by one of the other leaders of the Sinaloa cartel, one of El Chapo’s four sons, who tricked him into getting on the plane to the U.S. under the pretense of looking at an investment property.

El Mayo turned himself in immediately and is basically going through a plea bargain, leaving him with nowhere to turn because the evidence against him is overwhelming, and now there’s another insider involved.

The question is, what kind of operational impact will this have on the Sinaloa cartel? The cartel fractured into several dozen pieces after El Chapo’s fall, with El Mayo controlling the largest chunk. The second, third, fourth, and fifth largest chunks are controlled by those close to him, one of whom just turned him in. We already have another key player in custody in the United States, so two of the four are down, and three of the five kingpins are down.

In the short term, this means a lot of bloodshed in Mexico as these factions, without their leader, splinter and other factions try to grab pieces. Local crime groups in these areas will also try to seize opportunities. Mexico is already coming out of a three-year period that’s the most violent in the country’s history, and this situation isn’t likely to improve that.

However, now that the U.S. has some idea of where the money is flowing and the routes used, we can start dismantling the Sinaloa apparatus within the United States. Don’t expect this to have a huge or immediate impact on the flow of narcotics into the U.S. That is driven by two things: one, Americans really like their cocaine, and two, because cocaine is very expensive per unit of weight in bulk, it’s easy to smuggle. There will always be groups in Mexico and the U.S. willing to push that stuff through, but it just won’t be at the institutional level of the Sinaloa cartel.

If you wanted to make a bigger impact, the target would have been a guy named El Mencho, leader of the counter-group to Sinaloa in Mexico, known as the Jalisco New Generation Cartel. Unlike El Chapo or El Mayo, El Mencho runs his organization as a one-man show and a crime boss, ruling by fear and violence, which is the point of his operation. He just happens to make money on the side selling drugs. Removing him would likely lead to a significant impact on the cocaine flow in the midterm, but it wouldn’t end it. As long as Americans want their coke, this will continue.

But I don’t want to take away from the victory here. The bookkeeper has been brought in, and that will absolutely have significant impacts.

Now, about that other topic you want me to talk about, Biden’s withdrawal from the race. It really doesn’t change things. I made the call two years ago on how this election is going to go, and I don’t see any reason to adjust that now. I made some minor adjustments a few weeks ago during the presidential debate, which showcased the mental incompetence of both candidates. But I would just add one thing: a lot of Americans, roughly 20 to 25% of voters and the vast majority of America’s true independents, have been saying for months that they want someone else to choose from. They don’t want to choose between two people they’ve had to choose from before. Independents are fickle voters; they hate voting for the same person a second time. Well, with Biden out and Harris in, they no longer have to. So what was likely to be a lopsided contest in favor of the Democrats already is now likely to be a rout for the Republicans, unless Vice President Harris absolutely messes things up in some way in the next few months. And that doesn’t seem to be her style.

Okay, that’s all I’ve got. Take care.

Is Chinese Nuclear Tech Better Than the US?

Photo show three nuclear power plant reactors

*This video was recorded in mid-July, prior to Peter departing on his backpacking trip.

I’ve been asked to address the claim that China has surpassed the US as a nuclear power. On paper, China might have the upper hand, but that doesn’t always translate to real life.

China has been busy building the world’s largest nuclear fleet, and the US hasn’t built a plant since the 70s (even if they have had more recent expansions). However, the technology being used in the Chinese plants is dated and ignores major safety concerns. The US has struggled to keep a labor force large enough to operate new plants, but there’s potential for modular reactors and new tech to shift the tides in favor of the US in the coming decades.

Now onto the explosive stuff. The US nuclear arsenal is top-notch, well tested and maintained. The Chinese are expanding their arsenal, but precision manufacturing and testing are limiting that growth.

So, the Chinese may have the numbers leaning their way for nuclear power, but in the areas that really matter (like nuclear weapons) the US is still sitting comfy.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hey, everybody. Peter Zeihan here, coming to you from a stormy day in Colorado. Hopefully, we won’t have a lightning strike close enough to make things too exciting. Anyway, today we’re taking a question from the Ask Peter forum. The question is about recent reports suggesting that the United States is falling behind China in nuclear technology. What are my thoughts on that?

This is a complex issue with both yes and no aspects. Let’s start with where China is doing well, which primarily concerns nuclear power generation and the deployment of new nuclear power facilities. Since the Three Mile Island incident in 1979, the United States has only built one nuclear facility, the Vogtle plant, constructed by Southern Company. A major issue they faced was talent and labor. When you haven’t built new nuclear power facilities for nearly 50 years, there aren’t many people entering that field, and those who were in it have mostly retired. As a result, the U.S. has had to reinvent certain skill sets and recruit former Navy nuclear engineers, like those who worked on submarines, to fill the ranks. This is a very costly process.

In contrast, China is building out what will easily become the world’s largest nuclear fleet. This means there’s a whole generation of nuclear engineers and construction workers in China who are experienced in this field. So, it’s not that Americans can’t do it or that we’ve lost the technology; we’ve lost the labor force. From a practical standpoint, that’s almost as bad. But it’s important to note that the type of nuclear reactors used in both the U.S. and China are typically light water reactors, a technology dating back to the 1950s. While China is developing a more robust and redundant labor force for 1950s and 1960s technology, this doesn’t necessarily mean they’re getting ahead in innovation.

If the United States decides to re-enter the nuclear power generation field, the likely approach would be through small modular reactors (SMRs). The advantage of large nuclear facilities is that they can generate over a gigawatt of power, enough to supply many cities. However, the problem with light water reactor technology is the potential for meltdowns, like a lighter version of the Three Mile Island incident. Public resistance to having these reactors near cities is a major reason why the U.S. hasn’t built more. In China, where public opinion and safety concerns are less of an issue, they’re building them rapidly.

The advantage of SMRs is their small size—they can fit on the back of a truck and be plugged into existing systems, like decommissioned coal plants. They are mobile and can be moved to where they’re needed. This makes them a good partner for renewable energy sources like wind and solar, which are intermittent, or for decarbonizing energy production. You can take an SMR to a decommissioned coal plant that already has all the infrastructure and simply set it up and run it. This technology could be a real game-changer.

However, building the prototype is a significant challenge. A company that was trying to break into this space faced setbacks last November when contracts fell apart, setting the effort back to the drawing board. While other companies are working on it, none are likely to have a working prototype within the next 3 to 5 years. Without a prototype, mass production of the technology is unlikely within the next decade. While SMRs are an interesting concept, they’re not progressing rapidly at the moment. As far as I know, China isn’t focusing on this direction either, as they’re more concerned with building large reactors.

There is also the possibility of using fourth-generation reactors, such as pebble-bed reactors. The French are working on this, but we’re not yet at the stage of having a functional prototype, so it’s too early to draw any conclusions. Even if the prototype is perfect, actual construction might not begin until 2035 to 2040.

Now, let’s talk about nuclear weapons. Nuclear materials aren’t just used for generating electricity; they can also make very dangerous weapons. The United States was not only the first country to build and use an atomic bomb but also the first to develop a hydrogen bomb. American nuclear weapons are likely still the best in the world, although we haven’t used one in quite some time. We’ve developed ways to use computer simulations to ensure our arsenal is effective and safe. The U.S. remains the world leader in maintaining and refurbishing nuclear reactor cores to ensure they don’t degrade.

However, the only way to know for sure how well these systems work would be to engage in a full-scale international intercontinental nuclear missile exchange—a test that, thankfully, we don’t want to conduct. But I’m confident that American weapons are still the most advanced. From the last time we had insight into Russia’s nuclear capabilities, they’ve likely slipped from being the second-best to something like ninth in the world. They still have many warheads, but the question is whether these warheads have degraded. Considering the poor performance of other Russian military equipment in Ukraine, it would be surprising if their nuclear arsenal were the one thing still functioning perfectly. This doesn’t mean we should provoke Russia into a nuclear conflict, but if such a situation arose, the blast radius of their bombs might be less than expected. It would still be a disastrous event.

As for China, they currently have only a few hundred deliverable nuclear weapons. They’re working on expanding this force and aim to reach some form of numerical parity over the next 15 years. This goal involves overcoming significant challenges, primarily related to precision manufacturing. Building a plutonium bomb requires creating an explosive core with a series of synchronized explosions around the core to force it to collapse and trigger a reaction. The Chinese can do this, but scaling it up is a challenge. They also need to miniaturize the warhead and ensure it can survive the forces of launch and re-entry. While the Chinese are not lagging in these areas, achieving all these requirements together is complex and untested in real-world conflict scenarios.

If they fail, it won’t be for lack of trying.

Is the US Looking for a War?

*This video was recorded in May of 2024

The potential of dragging the US into a major conflict is top of mind for a lot of Americans, but what would it actually take to get us there?

The US isn’t just going to rush into a significant conflict, there has to be something major that occurs first. We’re talking a political leader with a strong international agenda or a major provocation (like Pearl Harbor). China (at least for now) knows better than to provoke the US due to Chinese reliance on maritime trade. Russia’s incompetence and aggressive actions in Ukraine pose a potential threat, but only if the conflict directly impacts US interests.

When looking at US military action within North America specifically, conflict with the Mexican drug cartels is top of mind. Although the situation in Mexico is dire, any action by the US without Mexico’s cooperation would be disastrous for the future of the US-Mexico trade relationship.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hi, thanks for joining us today. My name is Michael, and I’m your director of analysis here at Zeihan on Geopolitics. It’s my pleasure to have a conversation with Peter Simon about some of the questions you’ve sent us about what’s going on in the world. Let’s start with the big one: What would it take to pull the U.S. directly back into a major conflict or war?

Oh, wow. Okay, so the United States has not been in a major, major conflict since World War II. In terms of the conflicts we’ve had since then, they were either in the context of supporting the global order—basically bleeding for our allies so they would stay our allies, like in Korea and Vietnam—or it was our attempt to forge a new world post-Cold War, like Desert Shield and Desert Storm.

For us to get involved in anything on that scale would require one of two things. Number one, a political leader in the United States who sees international issues as the crucible in which a new identity could be forged. There’s no sign of that happening on either side of the political spectrum at the moment. Or, someone doing something really, really, really breathtakingly stupid and provoking the United States.

This has happened before. You could argue that Pearl Harbor, the Cuban Missile Crisis, Sputnik, and the Kuwait invasion all fit this description. But when I look around the world at the powers in play, I don’t think the Chinese are anywhere near dumb enough to do that.

At least a few years ago, Chairman Xi and the Politburo realized that if there were a fight with the United States, it would be a fight on the water, and China depends on freedom of the seas to keep its people alive. The entire economic model, the food imports, the energy imports—they would just stop, and they know that would be suicide.

So, the only country right now where that might be an issue would be Russia, and that’s because of Russian incompetence. We’ve learned over the last three years that Russia doesn’t have a classic army in the sense most people think of. They basically have a mob they put guns in the hands of and throw at things.

It’s not that this strategy has never worked for the Russians. The Russians have won half of the wars they’ve been in. But if the fight reaches a point where it’s hitting U.S. interests, that’s where you get the direct clash. As long as the United States is at least passively interested in NATO, should Ukraine fall, then we could be in a more direct fight.

But we’re not there now. Even if the Russians continue making the gains they’ve been making in the last year for the next five years, we will still not be there. The dynamism of this conflict is difficult to get your mind around because so many things are shaping both sides. I’m not suggesting for a moment that Russia is about to break through the lines in Ukraine and win. I’m just suggesting that it has to be something on that scale for the United States to consider getting involved, barring some idiot somewhere doing a direct attack on the United States. Remember, the United States has rested and recouped from the war on terror. Its military isn’t doing much from a military point of view right now.

There are no occupations. There are no hot deployments. So, if somebody did pick that fight, God help them because no one else will. But you mentioned that the U.S. military isn’t doing much broadly, and most of the conflicts you described aren’t within North America. There’s nothing within North America that looks viable at the moment, something targeting a U.S. strategic interest to the point that would motivate the U.S. to enter conventional warfare.

Stepping back a little bit, are there regions within North America, perhaps, or concerns that American strategic leadership has within North America that the military could be used for, to bring some kind of resolution or achieve a strategic gain? Not at the moment. The only issue where that theoretically could arise would be dealing with Mexican drug cartels. Americans’ preoccupation with cocaine—their love of cocaine—has basically destroyed the capacity for rule of law to exist in large portions of Mexico. Add to that the general incompetence of the AMLO administration, and Mexico is in a much worse position now in terms of public safety, public health, and infrastructure than it was five years ago. There’s plenty of fault to spread around.

I will just underline that if anyone thinks the United States can impose a military solution on the cartel situation, you are batshit. Mexico is a huge place, and the cartel situation is far more complicated than anything we had to deal with in Pakistan or Afghanistan during the war on terror. If there is a military angle to be played there, it will have to be hand in glove with the Mexican administration, something like what we did with Colombia.

But at the moment, with the current administration in Mexico City, that is not even under a hair of consideration. If the U.S. were to try to impose a military solution without active participation from the Mexicans, you can kiss the trade relationship goodbye, and then the United States would fall into an economic depression as the single most important economic, human migration, and manufacturing and energy relationship in human history all break at the same time.

Don’t do that.

America’s Cold War Missiles Return to Germany, Thanks to Russia

Picture of a Tomahawk cruise missile mid-flight

Well, it looks like the Germans are going to be celebrating Christmas in July. That’s due to the US and Germany’s decision made at the NATO conference to redeploy American mid-range weaponry to Germany. And yes, this hasn’t happened since the Cold War for…historic reasons.

Russia is the country to blame here. They’ve been violating arms treaties for the past 15 years, so the US got fed up and bailed on the INF treaty five years ago; this triggered the redeployment process. There are a whole boatload of reasons that this is happening, but defense against the Russians tops the list.

While the Russians may have opened this can of worms, the fallout isn’t going to be confined to them. Since the treaty that barred the US from taking actions globally is now kaput, the Chinese will be feeling some of the heat too. You can expect to see some intermediate-range American weapons in close proximity to China and throughout East Asia, which should help limit China’s global economic influence.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hey everybody, Peter Zeihan here coming to you from the Lake of the Ozarks. It is Thursday, July 12th, and today we’re going to be talking about security in Europe. Specifically, the United States at the NATO conference has announced, with the Germans, that American mid-range weaponry is returning to Germany in a position that hasn’t been seen since the Cold War.

A combination of hypersonics, mid-range missiles, including the Tomahawk cruise missile system, is being deployed. The reason this is happening is because we had a series of Cold War and post-Cold War arms treaties between the United States, NATO, and the Soviet Union, like the Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty, or more specifically for this conversation, the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF). The Russians started bit by bit either violating or withdrawing from those treaties as far as 15 years ago and even started developing weapons systems that are expressly barred by the treaty and then deploying them.

Under the Trump administration, five years ago, the United States formally withdrew from the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty and has been moving bit by bit to redeploy these weapon systems ever since. The INF specifically bars weapons systems with a range of 500 to 5,500 km, roughly 300 miles to 3,000 miles, which basically covers the entirety of the hot zone now between NATO and Russia, including all of Ukraine.

The idea of these treaties, which dates back to Reagan and Gorbachev, was that if you take the weapons that are actually useful off the field, then you won’t have a tactical engagement or a tactical escalation. That just leaves the big strategic missiles, like the intercontinental ballistic missiles that are based in the United States. The desire to not use those is quite strong, so you take away the usable day-to-day missiles, and it forces both sides to basically come to the peace table. Well, the Russians have repeatedly moved away from that system, and now they’re going to find themselves facing weapons systems that, while maybe designed 50 years ago, are perfectly serviceable.

The United States is dusting off things like hypersonics that it developed back in the ’70s and ’80s but never deployed. Now they are being deployed. The balance of forces for the Russians across the entire theater is about to go from problematic to catastrophic. Keep in mind that one of the many reasons why the Cold War ended when it did is because NATO and, to a greater extent, the United States, defeated the Russians in an arms race. The Soviet Union simply couldn’t keep up with the economic power of the United States. While Russia today is significantly economically weaker than the Soviet Union ever was, the United States is significantly economically stronger than it was back in the ’70s and ’80s. So there’s really no contest here. The Russians have proven over and over again that while they can’t innovate, they can’t develop new weapons systems that are particularly capable, and they certainly can’t produce them at scale. Meanwhile, the United States, in many cases, is just literally dusting off things that have been in storage for 20-30 years and bringing them back online while also developing new systems.

The strategic picture for the Russians is a direct consequence of some very bad decisions they’ve made. A lot of the Russian position for the last 15 years has really been a bluff, and it worked until 2022 with the Ukraine war, which mobilized pretty much everyone in Europe. The Germans were the country that was most in support of the INF when it was negotiated because they were the ones in the crosshairs, and they were the country that was the most willing to overlook all of the Russian violations of the treaty because they lived in this kind of strategic nirvana that they didn’t want to end. Now, it’s the Germans who are actually arguing that the United States needs to deploy more and more weapon systems, not just to Europe, but to Germany specifically.

Okay, that’s kind of the big first piece. The second piece is the INF provided handcuffs on what the U.S. could do, not just in Europe, but globally. The country that has arguably benefited the most from the Americans refusing to deploy intermediate-range weapon systems isn’t Germany, it’s Russia. It’s China. If you look at a map of East Asia and consider all of the U.S. allies, especially Japan, the Philippines, Taiwan, Indonesia, and Singapore, the distance from those countries to the Asian mainland is in that 500 km to 5,500 km range.

So for the entirety of the post-Cold War period, the United States has been barred from deploying appropriately ranged weapon systems to counter the Chinese rise. Well, not anymore. Over the course of the next 2-3 years, we’re going to see a mass deployment of American weapon systems off the Chinese coast that are perfect for boxing in the Chinese. The Chinese have always argued strategically that this was the goal of the United States all along, which, of course, is horse crap. But keep in mind that unlike the United States, China is a trading power, and not having these weapon systems has allowed the Chinese to, from a strategic and economic point of view, become a global economic player.

If these weapon systems are in place, everything that the Chinese do could literally be shut down within an hour. The capacity of the Chinese to import and export could be ended almost overnight. So while it may have been the Russians who were the ones who were messing around, it’s absolutely going to be the Chinese who are the ones who are going to find out.

Photo by U.S. Navyderivative work: The High Fin Sperm Whale – Tomahawk_Block_IV_cruise_missile.jpg, Public Domain, Link Wikimedia Commons

Strong American Growth (and Something to Worry About)

If you don’t want to start your day with beautiful beach views and economic forecasts, you may want to skip the video. Today we’ll be discussing recent changes to the US economy and what future impacts might look like.

Trump and Biden boosted the economy with massive stimulus packages post-COVID, but things are beginning to settle down. There’s some minor issues starting to pop up, like a rise in loan delinquencies and higher interest rates, but the US economy still looks strong overall.

The bigger concern revolves around government spending surpassing private sector growth for the first time ever. This indicates a potential shift toward government-driven economic growth, that could undermine long-term dynamism and efficiency in the US economy.

This isn’t something that will happen overnight, but if left unaddressed, the US could face significant economic challenges down the road.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hey everybody, Peter Zeihan here coming to you from Monarch Bay in Southern California. today we’re going to do kind of a big picture economic take of the United States. because, you know, a lot has gone down in the last 25 years. I think it’s good for me to kind of put my stamp on the ground and where we are.

we might be getting back to some version of normal. It is a bunch of light here. Let me kind of spell that out from the back side. If you remember back to the transition from the Trump administration to the Biden administration, there was a contest among the two of them about who Americans would like more because they had been paid to, like.

the incoming Biden administration had made it very clear that the first thing he was going to do was $1 trillion stimulus that would put money in people’s hands, to get over Covid. And as soon as Trump heard about this, he’s like, well, I want to do that too. So I want to be like an administration to leave on a high point.

things, but work out that way. But he did put, I think it was $900 billion into the system in his final few weeks. and if you remember back, Covid was pretty much over by then. So we had $2 trillion dumped in and a quarter, into a system that was already experiencing rapid economic growth as one of the many reasons why we had an inflation pulse in the early Biden administration.

Anyway, you combine that with all the stimulus that was still rolling around in the system from the Covid crisis, and Americans conservatively entered the Biden administration with over $2 trillion in savings that they hadn’t had before, according to the San Francisco Fed. They didn’t finish burning through that extra capital until the first quarter of 2024. which means we’re only now finding the ability to like, oh, look at that.

A third of the economy with a more normal supply and demand dynamic. And at the moment, things look pretty good. yes. Loan delinquencies are rising, but we are pretty close to record lows still, nor nowhere near the average, or certainly nowhere near the numbers that we had back in the last technical recession in 2007. interest rates are higher, but delinquency rates are far lower than they were at the period before we entered any other recession.

So I’m not saying that this is like we’re going to grow forever or anything like that, but at the moment the mechanicals look pretty positive, and I wouldn’t expect the United States to enter into recession. This calendar year. And some things would have to get a lot worse for us to consider a recession in next calendar year. At the current moment.

if there is a concern, it’s more the structural because, it has to do with the balance between private credit and government spending. Now, normally, private credit rises and falls based on the job conditions. And if it rises too fast, you get a bubble, which leads to a correction. the last, of course, big instance. And we had that was the subprime building from 2000 to 2007, where we roughly doubled total private credit in seven and a half years.

And as a result, we had the Great Recession, which was no fun for anyone. nothing like that is in the books this time. private credit has been growing for the last 15 years. It’s something much more along the lines of the century average. normally, private credit only drops or goes negative in times of recession because banks and stock holders generally restrict their play of capital on the system at a time when everything is over leveraged.

we’re not seeing that today. Instead, what we’re seeing is more government activity. Normally, the balance between these two factors is private credit is in the driver’s seat, except in times of recession, which is when the government steps in. And if you add the two together, you get actually a pretty even. Why? What has changed in calendar year 2023 is that relationship broker.

And for the first time in modern American history, total new government spending, not just the deficit, but the increase in the deficit year on year, that number surpassed the total increase in private spending for the first time in American history outside of a recession. Now, this is only one data point. I don’t want to overplay this, but for the first time in American history, the government has become the primary driver of economic growth in the country.

This is not a healthy position to be in. This is a very Zimbabwe, South African, Venezuelan sort of approach to economic management. Now there’s still trillions of dollars of private investment. There’s still tens of trillions of dollars of private economic activity. this is not something I’m overly stressing about right now. But if the numbers from last year repeated this year and based on the Biden administration spending, it looks like they will be.

And then next year, which Biden has indicated they probably will be, or if Trump wins. Absolutely. And if they do these plans to expand the government, then we’re in a different era of it. And if you remove the private sector as the primary driver of American economic growth, yes, you might get a little bit more populous support for the government or a particular candidate, but it comes at the cost of long term dynamism and size of the American economy, which has served the United States very well these last 200 years.

Now, the degree of populism was always going to be in the cards, not just because of the politics, but because of our demographics. The baby boomers, the largest generation ever. There pass halfway through retirement. They’re going to be sucking at the government teat for Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security until the day they die. So government outlays have to go up, which means deficit spending has to go up.

And there is no, appetite on either side of the American political aisle to do anything about that, because it’s not a vote winner. and if this sticks, we will have a problem down the line. This is a much bigger problem than the federal deficit, because this changes the complexion of the American economy and how we can adapt to shifts in the future, because the government just isn’t nearly as efficient.

It can be quick, but it’s not efficient. And ultimately, the efficient use of capital is half of the American story. So you’re looking for something to worry about? I’d worry about that. But in the meantime, government spending is stimulatory. And that suggests that for this calendar year and next, we’re not looking at a recession. So, you know, take your good news where you can.

Can Former President Trump ‘Make Felonies Great Again’?

WE’RE LESS THAN A WEEK AWAY FROM THE WEBINAR!

Peter Zeihan’s Risk List: What Keeps a Geopolitical Strategist Up at Night

Please join Peter Zeihan for a webinar on June 5th at 12:00 PM EST on a topic that is near and dear to the hearts of the Zeihan on Geopolitics team: geopolitical risk. This webinar will feature Peter’s reasonable-fear list, focused on issues that in his opinion have the most potential to impact market outcomes.

Well, we’ve all heard the news at this point. Trump is a FELON, after being convicted on 34 counts of financial fraud related to hiding his affair. So, can Trump spin this “publicity” in a positive light or will it bite him in the ass come November?

The case was fairly straightforward, given the clear evidence and testimonials, but we’ll have to wait until July 11 for Trump’s sentencing. I wouldn’t expect him to see any jail time; however, the potential for probation and a (likely) dragged out appeals process could have significant impacts on his campaign schedule.

The real question is how does this effect Trumps shot at the presidency? It was already going to be a long shot for Trump, so this conviction and the fallout it carries might be the kiss of death. All Biden has to do now is just keep breathing.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hey everyone Peter Zeihan here. I am, on my way to Milan to fly home, and you guys just couldn’t wait for me to get home and get sucked me back into politics. Okay, so when I woke up this morning about the. Donald Trump has been convicted in New York for eight of 34 counts of laundry and financial fraud.

for hiding a, a theater, attempting to hide an affair that he had with the porn star Stormy Daniels. the way it works is …., 34 felonies, felony. Because if you engage in fraud and attempt to hide a crime, it automatically elevated class and felony. so let’s do a quick Q&A. what are the state things here?

And then talk about where this leads. does this mean that Donald Trump no longer run for president? no, it does not. there’s nothing in the Constitution that says but, there are who can run for president. although, funny thing, you can’t vote. but you can still run for president. number two, what’s next?

on July 11th, we get our sentencing hearing, and it is unlikely that Trump will go to jail. This was a nonviolent crime, and he’s a first time felon. Feels weird to say that. so we’re looking at probably some form of probation. Now, probation comes with restrictions. And as we’ve seen in the trial, with all of the charges of contempt of court and, gag order, is the chances of Trump following those restrictions are going to be interesting, especially in terms of campaign setting.

number three, what about appeals? Appeals will happen. Absolutely. But it’s unlikely that we will see the appeals process completed. But before we have the presidential election, the big difference this time we’re worried about his scheduling, because when he hasn’t been convicted of anything yet, the court was believed to create in the degree of deference when it came to scheduling, now that he’s been convicted of 34 felonies.

So there’s going to be very different. So, you know, things like the debates, things like rallies, those could actually be impacted pretty severely by whatever the appeals schedule is. A Trump will, of course, have a vested interest in dragging that to other possible. But even if he didn’t do that, certainly, I could be resolved before we get to the first week of November and have the general election.

And then finally, there’s the question of whether or not this is a fair ruling or not. okay, so I’m in Italy right now, and a lot of these conversations have come up. And, you know, the Italians have some experience with politicians who dabble in corruption, politicians who dabble in ideals, and politicians who combine the two. And the general ditch here, which was really funny, is like, if you’re going to do things like this, you have to have an accountant to hide everything well and a fixer to make sure that the news doesn’t get out.

In the case of Donald Trump, those two things were the same person. So like, oh, that’s not very smart. And then second, they’re like, and you get to keep these two people as close to you as possible because they’re the ones who know where the bodies are. They’re the people who have the receipts. And the reason why this court case was sewed up so quickly, and why did the jury only need a couple of days to debate?

34 different counts, and why they came back with a unanimous verdict so quickly? Is that the fixer in the accountant and all of their documentation flipped and were testifying for the prosecution. So the only other outstanding bit of information to make this an easy case was the court star herself, who also could show for the play. Yeah, the that’s into her bank account matched with the debits from Trump’s account.

So it really was from the accounting point of view, a very open and shut case, of the hospital you can think about for this matter. It’s big impact will have on the election. And, this is just amusing from my point of view, because as soon as the verdict came in in Trump campaign headquarters, cheers erupted. I feel like we can totally fundraise off of this.

And then Biden election headquarters cheers erupted. Totally fund both of us. everyone seems to have forgotten the abuse of the 10% of the electorate, were independents, were just kind of nauseated by the whole thing. And the independents have decided every presidential election since the early 1960s. And they are not going to vote for somebody who now has 34 felonies under his belt.

So as far as I’m concerned, this verdict has decided the election or other reasons to think that Trump was already in trouble. But this is really makes it impossible for him to win.

assuming, of course, that Biden doesn’t die, I’d have never.

The End of the World is Just The Beginning

Disunited NAtions

The Absent Superpower

The accidental superpower

The End of the World is Just The Beginning

Disunited Nations

The Absent Superpower

The Absent Superpower

The End of the World is Just The Beginning

Disunited NAtions

The Absent Superpower

The accidental superpower

The End of the World is Just The Beginning

Disunited Nations

The Absent Superpower

The Absent Superpower

The End of the World is Just The Beginning

Disunited NAtions

The Absent Superpower

The accidental superpower

The End of the World is Just The Beginning

Disunited Nations

The Absent Superpower

The Absent Superpower

The End of the World is Just The Beginning

Disunited NAtions

The Absent Superpower

The accidental superpower

The End of the World is Just The Beginning

Disunited Nations

The Absent Superpower

The Absent Superpower

Transcript

Transcript

Transcript

Transcript

Transcript

Transcript

Transcript

Transcript

Transcript

Transcript

Join 200,000+ other subscribers

Stay Social

GEOPOLITICAL INSIGHT STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX