All That Bitchin’ Won’t Keep China Around

A skyline of Beijing, China

We’ve all been there. It’s Friday evening, the office is packing up for the weekend, and the boss decides it’s the perfect time to announce something big. So, I hope you enjoyed your weekend of mulling over the idea of what a 100% tariff on all Chinese imports would look like.

This is a retaliatory tariff in response to Beijing’s rare earth restrictions, but this is bigger than trade drama. China is falling apart demographically, which will domino into everything else over the next decade (ahem, like exports). Whether China-US trade stops because of tariffs or demographics, it is coming soon.

In short, quitcha’ bitchin’ and get ready for a world without China.

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Hey, everybody. Peter Zeihan here coming to you from Colorado. It is the 10th of October, and it’s just after closing time in Washington, D.C.. And right after everybody closed for the day, Donald Trump said that there’s going to be a 100% tariff on everything coming from China by November 1st, if not before, because the Chinese are putting restrictive, policies on their exports of rare earth materials, most notably to the United States. 

Rare earths are materials that are produced in trace amounts as a byproduct of the refining and mining of other metals, most notably, silver, lithium, copper. You basically have to take the concentrate that’s left over once you’ve gotten the primary stuff and then go through a series of refining steps that are very energy intensive and very polluting. 

And China has cornered that market. So they produce more than 80% of all of these materials. In some cases, it’s a functional 100% monopoly. Anyway, a lot of these materials help other properties emerge in more traditional things that I can be used very heavily in things like defense, materials. And so the Chinese have always found this to be a very useful pressure point. 

They’re also very much used in semiconductors. Anyway, the Chinese have restricted their exports. Trump has said no more and is now basically, saying that he’s going to double or more the tariffs that are in place. And that’s just the beginning. Okay. Now, before anyone makes this about trade or makes sort of Trump, I need to remind you guys of something. 

The Chinese are dying out. They already have more people aged 54 and over than 54 and under, and within ten years they will not have enough people under age 60 to run an economy. So it doesn’t matter who you are, it doesn’t matter what your producer export or import. 

You need to assume that that trade relationship is going to go to zero. Doesn’t matter if you’re exporting soy or beef or semiconductors or ethane or anything. Zero zero is where this is going. It doesn’t matter what you import from China, whether it’s transformers or wire or process chemicals or fertilizer or anything. It doesn’t matter. It’s going to zero. 

The only wiggle room here is the time frame. Either the Chinese die out over the next ten years and it goes to zero, or the Trump administration puts into place and owners tariffs. And by November 1st, or maybe even before it goes to zero, either way it is going to zero. So everyone needs to plan for that happening. 

Does the time frame matter? Of course it matters. Would I like to have more time? Of course I would like to have more time. But to pretend that this is a purely political question that can be negotiated away is a fallacy. And if that is your position, you’re going to lose everything. So quit your bitching and start your planning for a world without China. 

Sooner or later.

Life After Trump: President JD Vance

ance speaking at a rally in Wilmington, North Carolina; October 2024 | Photo by Wikimedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JD_Vance#/media/File:JD_Vance_speaking_at_a_rally_in_Wilmington,_North_Carolina.png

Anytime we have a sitting US president that has exceeded the average lifespan, it’s a warranted endeavor to explore what happens after…they bite the dust. So, how would President Vance hold up?

It’s impossible to know exactly how a Vance presidency would play out, but we can draw on some historical parallels. Obama and JFK were junior senators just like JD Vance, so they would all have comparable levels of experience when entering the White House. However, Obama had a nice network of qualified advisors, Vance does not. JFK rose to the occasion during the Cuban Missile Crisis, so Vance could very well do the same in his situation.

Should this all come to fruition, any success will have to come from Vance himself. He surely won’t be getting any (meaningful) help from the circle Trump leaves behind.

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Hey everyone, Peter Zeihan here. Coming to you from Los Canyon. This is the famous jumble of Los Canyon. And yes, that is the trail behind me. If you can see it, your has got better eyes than I do. Anyway, today we’re taking a question from the Patreon crowd. Specifically, let’s assume that, 

Donald Trump being 80, does what 80 year olds dies and exit stage, right? 

What would a president JD Vance white House look like? The short answer is no idea. JD Vance is a junior senator. And so you never know, when he’s confronted with real world problems and actually, he’s in charge of something, how he’s going to react. 

But let me point out two things to you. We have two presidents who were junior senators who, became president and they kind of give us goalposts, guidelines. I’m not saying that he would turn out like either of them, but it’s really our only points of reference. The first is Barack Obama. Barack Obama, in my opinion, he’s going to go down in history. 

He’s one of the top ten worst presidents we’ve ever had. His problem was that he was so anti-social that he just didn’t want to have meetings with anyone, including his own cabinet secretaries. And so for eight years, we didn’t functionally have a foreign policy. We had very little domestic policy. We just had a bunch of speeches from time to time. 

The difference between JD Vance and Barack Obama is very simple. Barack Obama did build an independent coterie of people around him when he went to the white House, and then he was able to tap the Democratic Party for expertise to fill his cabinet. JD Vance doesn’t have that option. He was almost a no. One when Donald Trump picked him. 

So he has no independent followers, especially followers who have, skills that could be applicable to governance. And Donald Trump is absolutely destroyed. The Republican Party as a source of talent. So if he were if JD Vance were to become president, he would become president alone with no one around him except for the people who used to hang on to Donald Trump. 

And as we’ve seen from the people who hang on to Donald Trump, most of them are not particularly competent in their chosen fields. So it could be ugly. The other option is JFK junior senator, was at best a mediocre president. Maybe if he hadn’t been killed, it would have turned around. Who knows? But something to keep in mind is the Cuban Missile Crisis. 

One of the reasons that the Soviets pushed when they did is because they thought the American president was weak. A lot of us probably did at the time. And lo and behold, JFK had nerves of steel. And the Cuban Missile Crisis was more or less resolved to America’s, long term advantage. So we can’t rule out that J.D. Vance has it in him somewhere. 

But just like JFK, if it’s going to happen, it’s going to happen because of J.D. Vance. It will not happen because of the circle of people he surrounds himself with, which makes it overall a risky bet.

A Break for Ukraine

Ukraine solider on a armored vehicle with a split screen of Donald Trump

President Trump might finally be throwing the Ukrainians a bone, as the US may begin providing the precision targeting intelligence for strikes deep inside Russia. This marks a major shift in US policy on Ukraine.

Let’s zoom out first. For decades, US presidents would avoid actions that could spike global energy prices. Well, that held true through Trump’s first term and until Biden left office, but Trump 2 has shaken things up.

The erratic policy implemented by the Trump administration has been hard to follow, but the Russians have gotten more favorable treatment so far.

Things now seem to be shifting. Trump realized that Putin had been playing him this whole time, so Trump may finally be switching up policy. Couple this pivot with Ukraine’s recent strikes on Russian energy infrastructure and we could see Russian oil exports crippled very soon. This means Russia’s main source of funding for the war would quickly dry up. Places like China and Iran will have to decide if they want to bankroll Moscow without any incentives…

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Good morning, everybody. Peter Zeihan here coming to you from Colorado. Today we’re talking about what’s going on in Ukraine and with the Trump administration. The new news is that the Trump administration. Well, let me rephrase that. Donald Trump personally, says that fairly soon the United States is going to be providing the Ukrainians with precision, targeting information. 

For the Russian energy system deep within the Russian Federation itself. Now, there’s a lot of back story that got us to this point. So let’s handle that before we move forward. The US administration, not just this one, all of them going back at least until the 70s. I’ve always been a little paranoid about energy prices as result of just the nature of economics. 

Energy demand tends to be inelastic. If you need a gallon of gas to get to work, and the price of gas goes up by 100%, you still need a gallon of gas to get to work. So it tends to be something that is very politically sensitive. And as a rule, political leaders, presidents are unwilling to do things that they know. 

We’re going to drive up energy prices. Now that relationship has loosened quite a bit in the last 20 years, largely because of the shale revolution in the United States, which has taken the United States from the world’s largest oil importer to the world’s largest oil exporter, which has some interesting effects on lots of things. But that general feeling remains. 

Now, back during the Biden administration, the Ukrainians started targeting Russian energy assets, most notably refineries, in an attempt to disrupt gasoline and diesel deliveries. The military tends to use diesel. The civilians tend to use gasoline. The idea was if we can stop the fuel flows, the Russians will be able to prosecute the war as much. In addition, the Russians don’t have a lot of storage, so if they can’t process fuel, they have a limited export capacity. 

And that means that they will have to shut in some production. Well, the Biden administration shut that down because they were afraid of the impact that it was going to have on global energy prices, which is not a ridiculous point of view, but I still think it was wrong because the shale revolution has changed of that. But the previous administration really didn’t understand petroleum energy economics, so I can’t say I’m shocked. 

That was the conclusion that they came to enter the Trump administration. The Biden administration was pretty pro Ukraine there just a few things they didn’t want him to do, like targeting energy. The Trump administration has been very erratic. In the early days, they were pathologically hostile to the Ukrainian government, up to and including inviting Zelensky to the white House just so they could yell at him. 

And relations. I don’t want to say they’re in the deep freeze, but they have not been great. Trump, as part of his reelection campaign, tried to convince everybody that he and Putin were best bros, and all it would take was one conversation between Trump and Putin for the war to end. Which, of course, was always really incredibly stupid because the war is happening for geopolitical reasons. 

And the only people think that the Russians invaded because Biden was president are Trump the people around him and some MAGA hardcore folks is the Russians think it’s hilarious that they’re actually Americans believe this. It’s a strategic issue. It’s a demographic issue. The Russians have been pushing towards the Carpathian since the 17th century. It didn’t change because of who was in the white House anyway. 

The Russians have gone out of their way to denigrate the American president, to make fun of them, to call them stupid. In the Kremlin, behind closed doors in European venues with the Chinese. But that information, as a rule, doesn’t make it back to Donald Trump, because Donald Trump has this really weird quirk. He feels that he has to be the smartest person in the room, and he likes to talk a lot. 

So what that means is he has gutted the top of the national security and foreign policy staff to make sure there’s no one ever in the room with him that could tell him something that he doesn’t want to hear, or would make him not appear to be the smartest person in the room, which means he’s basically gutted it completely. 

He’s not using the State Department. He’s not using the National Security Council. He has, however, installed a woman by the name of Tulsi Gabbard as the director of National intelligence, and she has gone through the CIA and the other intelligence bureaus and basically gutted them of the Russian experts, top to bottom. And she’s also the person who has the final say in what goes into the Presidential Daily Brief. 

So she makes sure that anything that makes the Russians look bad doesn’t actually make it into the brief. For example, Putin laughing openly on TV about Donald Trump’s stupidity. Anyway. 

Will this time be different? Because we’ve had lots of periods where Trump has got an inkling that something is wrong, and then Tulsi Gabbard has talked him down, or Putin has talked him down. Maybe, and the reason is because there’s another personality involved and this person is absent or his name is Steve Wyckoff. Now, if you remember back to Trump one, Jared Kushner was all the big deal, smart guy, basically served as a presidential envoy and actually got a few things done. 

For example, the Abraham Accords, which is the sum of the total peace deals between the Israelis and some of the Arab states. Kushner wanted nothing to do with Trump, too. he saw how the sausage was made from the inside. And Trump won. And he and his wife, who is Trump’s daughter, just bugged out. 

And so it’s the dumb sons that are actually in the white House now. Anyway, I’m getting I’m getting off track here. Where was I going with this? Oh, yeah. Wait, wait. Cough. So, what? Cough has no foreign policy experience. And Trump basically entrusted him with the entire portfolio for all negotiations all over the world, all of which have gone really badly. 

So when Wyckoff shows up at the Kremlin, the Russians sit him down. They tilt his head back and they pour gallons of Russian propaganda down his throat. He goes Ben back to the white House and vomits that up in front of, the president of the United States. And that becomes gospel. And that is the primary reason, combined with Tulsi Gabbard, as to why we’ve really seen no movement. 

But things have changed recently because a couple months ago, if you remember there was a summit directly between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, and it was supposed to last for several hours, and it was over very, very quickly. Putin thought he had Trump completely wrapped around his little finger. And if you look at policy from the last six months, that’s not exactly a shock. 

But Trump finally realized that this guy had been laughing at him for the whole time. And we started to get Trump looking at other bits of information like, I don’t know, media or talking to his wife. And he started to realize that he had been played the fool and that he was acting like a fool, and that perhaps the only way to change things was to change policy with a wild idea, I know. 

So we now have this, potential change in policy. The Ukrainians have started targeting Russian energy infrastructure again. Again, mostly going after refineries, but going after some pipeline places. And they’ve probably now reduced Russian refining capacity by 25%, which is the most it’s been offline since the Russian collapse back in the 1990s. The post-Soviet collapse. If if the Trump administration actually does what it’s talking about doing US satellite guidance combined with the weapons the Ukrainians already have, would be capable of targeting individual pumping stations anywhere in western Russia. 

And the Russians export about 5 million barrels a day through their various methods, about two thirds of that going out through the Baltic Sea, in the Black Sea, which are all within range of Ukrainian weapons. If you take out just a couple of the 

pumping stations per pipe, those exports go to zero. Now the Ukrainian thinking is if you do that, you basically destroy what has been Russia’s number one income source for the last 30 years. 

Oil exports. And then countries like Iran and China, which have been taking money from Russia and sending them drones and drone parts, will have to decide whether they want to directly subsidize the Russian government’s war in Ukraine. I find that unlikely. Iran is really in some dire straits right now. They need the currency. 

They don’t want to treat Russia as a charity case. And the Chinese, that’s probably a bridge too far, no matter how bad relations with the United States happened to be. So if that happens and the Russians have to fight on their own, it doesn’t mean that the war is over. But it means you have a catastrophic shift in fortunes on both sides. Will this happen? That’s entirely up to Donald Trump. 

He has changed his mind by my math, 77 times since January 20th. Who knows? But once the Intel is provided, for every day that it is there, the Ukrainians will definitely be striking. Both the Russians and the Ukrainians over the last year have been building up their drone capabilities, and we’re now regularly seeing attacks that use hundreds of drones on each side. 

You combine that with the precision targeting information, much less Western weaponry, and you can have a really dramatic change in the course of the war in literally a matter of days, and we may about be there.

A Rare Sign of Life in Congress

The dome of the United States Capitol Building in Washington, DC.

It looks like there’s finally a sign of life coming from the Senate chambers. After years of ceding power to the executive branch, a handful of Senators seem to have finally taken a stand.

Senators have given the Trump administration a very long rope; I mean, just look at some of the unqualified figures that got Senate confirmation. However, Trump’s nominee to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics has led us to the end of that rope.

Several Republican senators refused to even meet EJ Antoni, much less vote to confirm him. Unsurprisingly, the nomination of EJ Antoni was withdrawn on October 1. While I don’t want to oversell this one instance, it is a promising sign of life in an otherwise sleepy and knee-bent Congress.

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Happy sunset from Colorado, Peter Zeihan here. And today we’re going to talk about Congress because apparently something interesting is finally happening there. For those of you been following me for quite some time, you know that I’ve been broadly disappointed with Congress for over a decade. Basically, the senators and especially the House have outsourced all their responsibilities to the executive branch and just turned into, a general scream shop, not even a talk shop. 

We haven’t really had meaningful legislation that hasn’t originated in the white House in quite some time. And a lot of that has been, let’s just call it subpar. Anyway, these trends really came to a head in this new administration. Trump two, where the Republican Party, for all intents and purposes, no longer exists as the institution that it used to be. 

It used to be a place where young leaders would be trained up, where people could not just be indoctrinated but actually taught to lead. And there was a policy arm within the institution to generate the sort of people who could then serve as advisers and even cabinet secretaries over the long run. When Trump ran for reelection this most recent time, he took over the party and basically got rid of all of that. 

So there’s no new generation waiting in the wings or is no longer a set of policy experts that he can draw upon. It is just now an institution that exists to service his personal needs, whatever those happen to be. And so the Republican Party, for all intents and purposes, is now gone. Now, that doesn’t mean that you get immediate turnover in Congress. 

And one of the things that we saw in the early months of the Trump administration, Trump two, again, is that Donald Trump would personally do a lot of arm twisting to convince senators to vote for his cabinet appointments for people who were really just deplorably unqualified. The big four, of course, are Pete Hegseth in defense, who continues to show over and over and over again that he doesn’t understand how an organization works much less a military. 

We have the DNI, director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who, if she’s not working for the Russians directly, certainly shares their worldview on all things American and continues to accidentally out spies. I think we’re up to nine now. We have let’s see. Kash Patel at the FBI, who is very charitably a, conspiracy theorist with absolutely no law enforcement, experience. 

And then we have, RFK Jr at Health and Human Services who is just a complete nutjob and has recently gotten Donald Trump to declare that he feels that Tylenol causes autism. Along with all kinds of other vaccine nonsense. Anyway, the point is that Trump leaned on the Republican senators in the Senate to confirm these people, even though they were wildly unqualified, and under normal circumstances, they would have never been nominated, much less confirmed. 

And there were a number of centrist senators who are really big on things like rule of law, who told the president, look like, you know, we’re going to give you the benefit of the doubt here. You’re the president. You just won. You have a cabinet that you want. We’re going to help you build it. But you’ve got to promise us that these people aren’t actually nuts, and they’re going to put some time in to learn their portfolios so that it’s not an utter disaster. 

Well, here we are a few months later, and it’s been pretty disastrous. Now, that’s kind of piece one of what’s going on. Piece two is something called the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Now, US statistics are generally considered to be by far the best in the world. And almost all of the major countries out there try to model their statistics collection on what the United States does. 

But the only group that disagrees with that is the really hardcore MAGA, led by Donald Trump, of course, who feels that, BLS and US government statisticians in general have been lying about the statistics for years in order to make him look bad and make Biden look good. No evidence has ever been presented on this topic because there probably isn’t any, everyone else in the world still thinks US statistics are the best on the planet and throughout the business community. 

That is not exactly a controversial point of view. Anyway, Donald Trump fired the director of BLS a few months ago and decided that he wanted to put somebody who was much more pliable in that position. 

The person he selected is a gentleman by the name of E.J. and Tony. Now E.J. and Tony does have a PhD. He does have a background in economics, but nothing that has to do with data, nothing that has to do with labor statistics. And E.J. and Tony has been basically for several years now, hitting the airwaves as a kind of a social media star denigrating the blues and economists in general. 

And he’s made it very clear. I mean, you don’t have to really read between the lines on this one, that if he does get confirmed, he will go through and basically rip up the entire system and just start making up statistics to make Donald Trump look good. So, 

if you’re not a hardcore MAGA and you’re not in the white House and you’re not part of the Heritage Foundation, which is where E.J. and Tony is, has been chief economist. 

This is not a guy that you want. No one else has come out to endorse him. Heritage Foundation. Well, that’s a sad story. It used to be a really solid conservative think tank 15 years ago, but it’s basically denigrated into MAGA world right now. And now it’s all about conspiracy theories. Anyway,  diAntony is disliked. 

Like basically everybody in the community, community mean people who can do math. And he’s basically described as a social commentator who happens to have a PhD, not someone who’s a statistician or an economist. Well, the interesting thing that happened October 1st is the Trump administration withdrew his nomination. Now, the really curious thing is why they did that. 

The reports out of Congress is that there are a number of Republican senators who rolled over for people like RFK Junior and Tulsi Gabbard and Pete Hegseth, who refused to even meet with them. Tony. Apparently, got to the point where enough is enough, and Congress is actually, at least at some level, starting to consider actually doing its job as an independent branch of government. 

Now, I don’t want to oversell this because this is one event, albeit a very, very big one against a constellation of giving in, the, the personalities, in question are kind of up in the air, but probably the big three are Murkowski of Alaska and Collins of Maine and Grassley of Iowa, all three of which are very big on rule of law issues. 

But if it was just those three. He could have still been confirmed because the Republicans have a majority and Vice President JD Vance could always go in and flip the switch to break a tie. So it has to be more and it probably has to be more than 1 or 2 more in order for us to be in a situation suggesting there’s at least a half a dozen Republican senators who have said, no more. 

And that, for me, makes this a very good day.

America’s Generals Gathered for…That?

Official government photo of Pete Hegseth

It appears Trump and Hegseth have been getting the Led out, because the song ‘Ramble On’ pretty much summarizes how their speeches went the other day.

With America’s generals gathered, I was worried that Defense Secretary Hegseth and President Trump would make some dangerous comments or announcements. While they both managed to make everyone seriously uneasy, it was more mush than alarming.

Hegseth focused on culture-war themes. Trump rambled about God-knows-what, with a few coherent sentences that the teleprompter fed him. But both speeches highlighted the lack of strategy and alarming drift of US military leadership.

Don’t believe me? We are including the text of the speeches so you can enjoy the fun yourself.

Link to Hegseth’s speech

Link to Trump’s speech

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Hey, all Peter Zeihan here. Coming to you from Colorado. This is a topic I was hoping to avoid, but so many people have written in on the Patreon page, and I feel like I kind of have to. Today’s the 1st of October. Yesterday was the 30th September. And, yesterday was the day that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and the US president, Donald Trump, addressed the entire coterie of American generals who were flown in for the speeches. 

Honestly, it reminded me of, Gaddafi of Libya or Fidel Castro of Cuba in their later decades when they would stand in front of an audience, says blah, blah, blah about nothing for hours. There didn’t seem to be a point to the speech at all. And the day before, two days before, when Trump was talking about putting himself on the agenda, he said something along those lines. 

Isn’t it nice that so many people are coming from so far away? But Secretary of Defense ordered them to come. This wasn’t a social call. 

I was originally very much dreading the speech. I was expecting perhaps a really dark turn in American form and strategic policy. Luckily, we did not see that, which is not mean that there was anything that happened to the speech that makes me feel good. I just that sense of dread I was feeling is no longer there. So, let’s start with Haig stuff, because that was the more substantive context. 

And then we’ll move on to, Donald Trump, because of, least qualified defense secretary in American history. His words, not mine. I just happened to agree with them. He said them during his, confirmation hearing. He actually said somebody who doesn’t know anything about the sector whatsoever, if they were to go in, could actually do better, than any of the secretaries of defense that we’ve had since World War two. 

He has proven that to be lovely, inaccurate. At this point, most of his speech was spent on the culture war. Basically, it was like he was giving a long monologue back from when he was on Fox News as a correspondent. Very, very short version. He made it very clear that any sort of protections that existed for any sort of group, whether it’s women or blacks or whatever, they were all going away, the physical requirements for anyone who is in a combat role will be based on men, which basically will exclude, 80 to 90% of women who are already serving from continuing if these policies are instituted. 

Keep in mind that the United States is going through demographic decline and the single largest growth unit in terms of recruitment for the military for the last half decade has been women, especially as we move to a more technical military. So by establishing these criteria, we’re basically guaranteeing that we’re not going to be able to hit our, recruitment numbers, and it’s going make hitting the technical numbers very, very difficult. 

Probably what this will mean is the United States will have to take a page from what it did during the war on terror, specifically in Iraq, and start playing, six figure salaries to contractors because we can’t generate the staff that is necessary. So from a strategic technical, recruiting, equity and especially warfighting capability, these pieces are just a series of horrible ideas. 

He also made it very clear that all of these generals who have decades of experience, if they don’t like it, they can quit, which is, you know, how it’s supposed to go with policy. But he was kind of rude about it. Anyway, I spoke to a number of people who were in the room, and, let’s just say that Secretary Hegseth is not exactly well respected because there’s a lack of credentials. 

And, well, some secretaries, like, say, Secretary Rollins in agriculture came in not knowing much, but really put her nose to the grindstone in order to school herself up on the issues in play. Hegseth has done nothing like that. He hasn’t even built a senior staff yet. So he does a lot of proclamations like this speech today or yesterday. 

And then he goes and does some social media or maybe pumps iron with the troops, because that’s what a secretary of defense is apparently supposed to be. My favorite line from someone in the room was that, if Secretary Hegseth just wanted to remind us all that he was incompetent and not worthy of the position. He could have just done that in an email. So harsh. Then Donald Trump. Oh, okay. So we’re going to append the full text of both speeches, Hegseth and Trump’s to you. So you can read this for yourselves. But oh my God. 

If I were to sum it up in one word, it would be bumbling. There were really only about three full sentences and an hour of him yammering on about loves lost and fights one, and how wife is one of his favorite words. And it was obvious when those three sentences came up because he was reading directly from the teleprompter. 

In his opening paragraph, he said, you guys can do whatever you want. You can laugh, you can cry, whatever. Of course, if you leave the room, then there goes your career. Super inspiring. Dude. There were no policy announcements. There was no strategic guidance. There was really no reason to be there. aside from the fact that he had a captive audience, and from what I heard from the people who were in the room, everyone was just sitting there. 

Stone faced the whole time because it wasn’t even a political speech. It was just rambling and the line of somebody who shared it with me that really got me was like, if the president wanted to highlight to us that he was no longer capable. Mission accomplished. I’ll let you read the speech yourself. I’ll let you decide for yourself. 

The one item that did perk people’s ears up is when the president said that he was considering using American cities as proving grounds for the US military. There is not a successful country in human history that has done that. Because once you turn the defenders of the nation on the citizens and the social contract is broken, and you need something new that is based on fear, that is the downfall of the Roman Empire and the Hittites and the Byzantines and any number of things since you keep your internal security forces and your external security forces separate at all costs and yes, yes, yes, Portland annoys me too. 

But the idea that you’re going to use Chicago or Nashville or anything else as a training ground, no, it was almost as if the president was daring the assembled generals to carry out their oath to defend the constitution of the country from all foes, foreign and domestic. And I am not comfortable with where this might lead. About the only thing I can say about it is that this was one of those bumbling passages that was made in passing, that was not the centerpiece of the speech. 

It was one line amongst a lot of mush. 

I don’t think anyone walked out of that room encouraged by their leadership or the current state of military policy. But considering some of the things that we have seen in military and strategic policy in the last few months, I still count this as a win.

Why Trump’s Stance on Canada Makes Sense

Canadian flag flying over Parliament

The Trump administration’s tough stance on Canada isn’t as novel (or as arbitrary) as it may seem.

The US has always been cautious with neighbors on the northern border, from Britain in the past to modern Canada. This view follows the long-standing US strategic view that an independent power on the northern border could pose a security risk.

That caution is wise and should be applied to any potential economic integration as well. Merging the US and Canada might sound nice, but when you lift the hood…not so much. The US would be stuck with the financial burden of caring for Canada’s rapidly aging population.

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Hey everybody. Hello. From Rock Island Pass at the border between the Hoover Wilderness and Yosemite National Park. Today we’re taking a question from the Patreon crowd as we’re doing this whole trip. What what what what why? Why is the Trump administration hit Canada so much? Is there anything to it or or should we just whinge? That’s actually the specific text of the question. 

Let’s start by saying that there is is something to it and it goes beyond her. The Canadians burning our Capitol, back in the War of 1812. And you Canadians, you cannot pledge innocence from this. You know you did it. Yes. The Brits drove the car pool, but it was Ontarian Abrines that brought the torches to the party and actually burned the white House down. 

Now bigger picture. The United States is a large country that basically has the best parts of the continent. But that doesn’t mean that the United States is alone on the continent. Obviously, Canada is the entire northern frontier and throughout American history. If you go back to before reconstruction, the United States was always concerned that an extra hemispheric power would establish a beachhead somewhere in the vicinity of the North American continent and potentially use it to interrupt American power or maybe even launch an invasion. 

And of course, most recently and from the beginning, actually, Great Britain was the power of concern. Now, I don’t mean to suggest that there was a British invasion imminent or anything like that. Don’t put words in my mouth. I’m going to piss off enough people with this video as it is. But the idea that you can have an independent power right on America’s borders that doesn’t bear some degree of security risk is just silly. 

That doesn’t mean that I think that there’s a war around the corner, that it’s even inevitable. Certainly not imminent, but it’s not a blind policy decision to decide that you actually want all of the continent under a single flag. And both it for those of you to the south of us in Mexico, this applies to you as well. 

Now, that said, I think that the borders between the United States and its neighbors are fine. I’m not worried about an invasion. There’s good buffers, whether it’s, lakes and force in the north or deserts and mountains in the south. The population density of Canada certainly couldn’t do it by itself. Mexico maybe a little bit better. But northern Mexico is such a logistical snarl because of a lack of infrastructure. 

That too, I’m not concerned about. But the bottom line is, is that this didn’t come out of nowhere. This has been part of the American strategic view for 200 years, and to pretend otherwise is being a little bit windy. Now. That said, do I think we should do it? I think candidate even if they ask. No, because it’s bad math. 

When industrialization really got going roughly a century ago, people started moving from the farms and into the cities and they started having fewer kids. And that process was much more intense in Canada than it was in the United States, because I don’t know if you knew this, but can it gets cold in the winter. And so the Canadians basically huddled together in their cities for warmth, and there’s a much higher dense urbanization rate. 

Oh, got a message dense urbanization rate for Canadians than there is for Americans, which means that the Canadians of age are much slower. They’ve also probably played the immigration card as hard as they can. It’s starting to generate social disruption. And so the old Trudeau government and the new government have cracked down on immigration. Quite a bit, basically slowed it to a trickle. 

Oh, Mr. Popular, all of a sudden, which means that Canada is aging much, much, much quicker than the United States. And remember, in the United States, the baby boomers are already two thirds retired. So we know we face an explosion in social welfare payments over the next decade. Canada is ahead of us, and Canada lacks a millennial generation of size comparable to what we have south of the border. 

Which means if we were to do a merger of the Canadian provinces and the American states, it would be up to the United States to pay for the retirement of most Canadian citizens, most notably in Ontario, Quebec, and in the maritime provinces where the demographic decline is most advanced. So from a purely financial point of view, merging the two countries would be economic suicide for the United States. 

Let Canada pay for this. And if that means Canada pays for other things too, great.

While I Was Gone, Part 4: US Security

Shield of the Federal Bureau of Investigation

To wrap up this short series on things that went down while I was away, we’ll be looking at some alarming developments in US security.

The FBI raided former National Security Adviser John Bolton’s home and office, under accusations of mishandling classified documents; that’s a bit rich coming from the current administration, but I digress. The bigger issue is that using federal law enforcement as a political weapon mirrors authoritarian states like Russia and China. This relates to the other big news, where Trump has ordered the US military to form specialized units for patrolling American cities; this is just all-around bad policy.

If there was a time for Congress to assert itself as the adults in the room, it would be now.

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Hey all. Peter Zeihan here coming to you from the Lake of the Ozarks. This is the last in our series of. What the hell were you thinking while I was gone? Was I backpacking for two weeks? And the world kind of fell apart. This time we’re going to talk about security in the United States borders. There are two big things that went down when I was gone, both of which concern me greatly. 

The first involves a gentleman by the name of John Bolton. John Bolton was a national security adviser, which is kind of America’s top foreign policy coordinator during the first Trump administration. But after seeing how the sausage was made inside, he left the administration and basically became a critic and has now been one of the more reliable voices for saying when Donald Trump is doing something that perhaps isn’t the brightest. 

Well, while I was gone, the FBI was ordered to raid his business and raid his personal residence. And he has now been accused of improperly handling classified materials. The hypocrisy of this is pretty rich. Anyone who is, like, independently minded will be able to tell in a second that the Trump administration is the least information secure administration we’ve ever had. 

We’ve already had a number of cabinet ministers, up to including the vice president, included in signal checks, which is a Russian penetrated not particularly secure platform in which they shared operational data. We’ve had situations most recently in the, the Alaska summit where informations and the personal information of security and diplomatic personnel, including their contact information, was just left on a printer. 

And we’re seeing a general disregard for all the counselor generals, assuming they haven’t been fired already, which are the people who are supposed to maintain information security within the administration. So this administration is leaking classified information massively. We even have our DNI who’s in charge of the intelligence system. Outing covert covert agents around the world on Twitter. 

And so to accuse Bolton of doing something inappropriate with documents is is really rich, especially since he has been in government service in this sort of role for over 20 years and has never even had a hint of that concern brought up, ever. I mean, there’s a lot of reasons to not like John Bolton. Mostly political or personal. 

He’s not a particularly nice gentleman, but no one has ever accused him of not being competent. So that’s number one. Using the FBI as a hit squad for political opponents, is something the United States has never done. This is right out of modern China or 2000s. Russia, or maybe a Latin American democracy. This is not a great thing. 

The second thing which actually concerns me even more is what’s being done with the military. The US military is designed to do military operations overseas. They’re designed to kill people and detect threats. But Trump has given the order for the military to form specialized units designed to specifically patrol and pacify American urban centers. Now, the US military is not good at law enforcement, and it has never been trained to be good at law enforcement. 

Third thing is to get in a tank or getting a jet and go overseas and do things there. When you put them into a law enforcement role, like we saw, say, in the Iraq occupation, things go to hell really quickly. Their equipment’s not right for the training is not right for it. It’s a mismatch. And so a lot of people died that probably didn’t need to. 

You take those same people and you put them on American soil and tell them to do law enforcement. And we’re in a very different situation. The only governments in modern history that use their military for urban pacification are those countries where occupying their own people is a national security issue. This is Iran. This is, to a degree, Russia. 

This is to a degree, North Korea. This is not something we want to see. Not only would it be violent, not only will there be a lot of political degradation because of it, not only will this erode the US military’s capacity to function. It is by far the most expensive way that you could possibly do it, because you’re taking people that you’d like to say trained to work on an Abrams tank. 

It’s people that you probably cost at least a quarter of $1 million just to do their training and then beaten them. Beat cops? No. So we have this cascading list of economic and social and political and health and national security military issues that just in the last two weeks have taken an absolute nosedive. 

I’m not a call to action guy, but we’re nearing the point pretty quickly where if Congress cannot find a backbone to re inject some sanity into American policy, we’re going to be having some severe degradations in our economic, social, and military models that are literally going to take us decades to unfuck. This is getting very real.

Trump Trade Talks: Japan Gets a Deal

Photo of Japanese Yen

Japan is one of the few countries who has been willing to step into the batter’s box and take whatever Trump throws at them. This time at the plate, they were tossed a 15% tariff on Japanese goods (with some big caveats).

Tariffs on some of the most important exports, like cars and semiconductors, have been deferred for future negotiations. Which means Japan will be back at the plate in no time. The Japanese also pledged investment into US infrastructure via state-linked commodity institutions. Trump claims most of the profits will go to American pockets, but the Japanese disagree with that interpretation.

As is the running theme with most of Trump’s “trade deals”, this is predominantly fluff and the real talks are yet to begin.

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Peter Zeihan here, continuing our series on the new deals that the Trump administration has announced for trade with our major trading partners. Today, we’re going to tackle Japan. The Japanese situation is very similar to the European situation. And then it looks like the Trump administration, Donald Trump personally came up with a few numbers, walked into the room, said, I want this, this and this and this. 

And the Japanese nodded their head and smiled and say, sure. The headline figure for tariffs going, for, for goods coming from Japan. The United States is now 15%. And unlike in Europe, where there’s not a lot of back and forth in manufactured goods, to the degree that industrial substitution might happen with Japan, there’s a fair amount. 

Japan is an industrialized economy that doesn’t have a lot of consumption because of their demographic bomb. And so they export basic goods. Intermediate goods, processed goods and finished goods to the United States. So there’s a lot of room for things to move around if that ends up being the final number for the long term. 

But that’s probably not going to be the final number for the long term. The most interesting piece of the trade deal, as it’s currently been announced, is that on things like cars and semiconductors, those are going to be pushed off to another day. So even the Trump administration is saying that this is the beginning of the negotiations, not the end. 

Here’s the problem. Japan doesn’t make a whole lot of semiconductor, and the United States doesn’t make a huge number of semiconductors. But both of us absolutely dominate certain pieces of the supply chain. So the United States makes the silicon dioxide that basically goes into all of the world’s semiconductors. And we also do almost all of the design. The Japanese do some design, but they absolutely dominate the photo mask, which is, for lack of a better phrase, really fancy sunscreen. 

So when you were throwing the lasers at the chips, you can trim to different depths to achieve different things. These steps are not replicated in either country to the same degree that they would need to be. If you wanted to have a purely national semiconductor supply chain system. So the Trump administration, by pushing this off, is leaving unresolved the question of what the United States is. 

Semiconductor policy is going to be are we only interested in the last step, fabrication, which is what the Taiwanese do? Is that what we want? And we still want to bring in all the inputs that we need from the rest of the world, or do we want to completely indigenous semiconductor system. The first one is $100 billion question that would take 10 to 15 years. 

The second one is a $5 trillion question. That would take 20 to 40 years. And the Trump administration, to this point, hasn’t figured out how it wants to approach that, because that’s a huge tax, no matter which version of the question it’s going to be. And so things with Japan in that regard are being put off. Something similar is happening with drug manufacturing because the Japanese aren’t the ones that make the really cheap drugs. 

They make the more advanced drugs. And if you want to do that at home, you need a whole support chain going up to it. Okay, that’s kind of piece one. Piece two is a promise of investment, unlike the Europeans, where everything is done at the nation state level. And so negotiating with the European Union is a little loosey goosey. 

Japan is a sovereign nation. when you negotiate with Tokyo, you’re negotiating with Tokyo. And Japan is a country that over the course of the last 50 years, has realized that they have a poor system for raw material production and processing. So they’ve built a number of state entities to basically compensate for that. You basically throw state money at entities who are kind of relieve from the normal laws of supply and demand, and go out into the world and make investments that under normal circumstances, Americans wouldn’t make in order to source lithium or oil or whatever it happens to be, according to the terms of the current deal, those institutions will now start investing 

in American infrastructure in order to produce products in the United States. And 90% of the profits from those institutions will go to American entities. So two problems with that. Number one, these Japanese financial institutions that are government linked, they usually go into raw commodity production and processing. That’s not what Donald Trump said they’re going to do. 

He says they’re going to go into high end manufacturing. So already you’re talking about a significant shift in their mission and outside of their normal realm of expertise. The second problem is the idea that the Japanese will provide all of the money, but take hardly any of the profit. That’s a stretch. And as soon as Trump made these announcements, the Japanese like, that’s not what we agreed to at all. 

So unfortunately, in a similar manner to what we have going on with the European situation, this is the start of talks. This is the Trump declaration of what they want. Here we are. When this all started back on April 2nd. We’re now see May, June, July. We’re now three and a half months later. And we’re only now getting the initial declaration of what Donald Trump actually wants to see. 

Now, this is progress. But if you’re talking about the re fabrication of financial entities at the government level in Japan as the starting point for whatever this later deal is going to be, you’re still talking about projects that are going to be realized over the course of a decade or more. Not the sort of thing that can have any impact on things like the trade deficit on any meaningful time frame. 

We are once again, at the beginning of this process. We are nowhere near the end.

Trump Trade Talks: US-EU Strike a Deal

European Union Flags in front of a stormy sky

The Trump administration and the EU have announced a new trade deal. It’s more of a political headline than a meaningful agreement, but let’s break it down.

The agreement includes a 15% tariff on European goods, $750 billion in US energy exports to Europe over three years, and $500 billion in investments from EU institutions in US infrastructure. There is a lot to going on here, but the bottom line is that the “deal” was made with the EU, NOT the member countries. So, until the individual countries agree or decide to move forward with this…it’s just another wish list from Trump that’s not likely to go anywhere.

Up until now, these talks have just been political fluff. The structural issues in the US-EU trade relationship remain untouched and will stay like that until the real negotiations begin.

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Hey, I’m Peter Zeihan here, coming to you from a suddenly stormy Colorado. Today we’re launching off a new series on the status of the trade deals that the Trump administration has announced. We’re going to start with the European Union, which is by far the biggest. Now, Donald Trump has said this is the biggest trade deal ever. It doesn’t even make the top 25 list, actually, for the United States. 

And the problem is that a lot of the things that have supposedly been agreed to can’t happen. So, let’s start with the headline where we are at the moment. Then we’ll go into the detail. So the headline is that Trump was threatening the European Union with originally a 20% tariff, and that went up to 30%, then eventually 50%. 

And now it’s going to be 15%. And the Europeans agree to not retaliate, with their own tariffs. So there are a lot of folks across Europe who think that this is a particularly unfair deal. But, you know, whatever. 15% on European trade, Europe collectively is probably our fourth largest trading partner. That would have an impact on a lot of things. 

The United States and Europe have a relatively robust trading relationship that’s built on intermediate manufactured goods and then finished things like cars and aerospace that go both ways, as well as the United States sending a fair amount of energy products and processed materials, whether it’s lumber, cement or whatever. To the Europeans, the Europeans, of course, send a lot of luxury goods to the United States. 

French wine, of course, is on that list. Kentucky bourbon goes the other direction. You know, these are these are culturally intertwining trade types. And so throwing a 15% tariff on what’s coming from Europe to the United States is obviously going to require a squeeze in people’s budgets and redirect how things are going elsewhere. The thing to keep in mind, primarily when you’re talking about European trade, however, is that most of the stuff that we buy from Europe is not stuff that can really be sourced from other locations. 

So you’re either going to be looking at a reduction in demand as prices go up, or a withering of that trade relationship. So this is not one of those trade relationships where you’re going to see new industrial plant coming online in the United States to compensate. It’s not that kind of trade. That’s kind of the first piece. 

That’s the headline piece. That’s where we are. That all takes effect August 1st. The other two pieces are kind of loosey goosey and are very Trumpian. Trump has announced and the Europeans have said that, yes, this is broadly what we agreed to, that over the next three years, the Europeans will buy three quarters of $1 trillion in American energy products. 

Now, the energy product is defined very, very loosely to include things that don’t exist, like small modular nuclear reactors, or things that the Europeans just don’t buy from us like, for the most part, crude oil. Mostly we’re talking here about natural gas and liquefied form, but the number makes no sense. 

$750 billion in U.S. energy products over three years, the United States only exports a little over $300 billion of energy products total globally. So the idea that all of a sudden it’s all going to be and go to the United States, that would actually be a massive reduction in the take home pay for U.S. energy exporters. Right now, U.S. LNG exporters in particular, are in kind of the catbird seat because they look to see whoever is having a crunch, and then they send LNG there. 

So they get spot prices that are very, very, very high. If we were to send everything to the continent of Europe, we would be talking about more term contracts where the renumeration cost would be significantly lower because of the reliability. You would probably see U.S. LNG exporters see their profits drop by well over two thirds. And you’d probably drive a quarter of them out of the business if this agreement were to happen, which it won’t, because the European Union is not an economic entity. 

It is an international political organization among the member states. And the member states are the ones who decide what they buy from where. So the EU, the European Union institution, the executive arm, has committed to buy in the stuff, but their annual budget for the entire European Union is under $200 billion a year. So no, this is not going to happen at all. 

And if it did happen, it would be really bad for American energy exporters. That’s problem. One problem too, is that supposedly there’s going to be a half $1 trillion of investment by European entities in the United States. And again, the EU is a political institution that doesn’t have that kind of budget. It has agreed on behalf of the member states, but the member states are under no legal liability whatsoever to actually carry out the agreement. 

So what’s probably going to happen is a few months from now, these talks will continue again, because this is not a final deal. This is a memorandum of understanding for what the Trump administration would like to see happen. And even if this was a final deal, it would then have to be ratified by all the member states. But the EU institutions don’t have the political or legal authority to negotiate for their member states on behalf of things like energy and investment treaties. 

That is a bilateral deal. Those talks have not even begun. And from what we’re hearing from both the Trump administration and from Brussels, is that Trump basically came into the room with a few numbers, said, I want this, this, this, and this. And the Europeans kind of nod and smiled, assuming that this would end the conversation for the moment, which appears to be what has happened. 

But in terms of the real talks, the things that might address the irritants in the relationship, of which there are many, those haven’t even started.

Why Trump’s Stance on Ukraine Has Changed – Part 2

Ukraine solider on a armored vehicle with a split screen of Donald Trump

Let’s unpack Trump’s evolving stance on Ukraine a bit more today.

Trump came into his second term strapped with his loyalty vacuum, purging anyone who wouldn’t kiss the ring. This left Trump with a lackluster roster, many of whom had acquired a taste for Russian propaganda. All of that led to Trump giving Putin an extraordinarily long leash.

After six broken promises of peace, Melania talked some reality into Trump, and he is now pulling back on the lead. The question now is not whether to oppose Russia, but where to draw the line. US support for Ukraine has come cheaply so far, but nuclear retaliation from Russia is still looming on the horizon.

We still don’t know where Trump will take this, but his stance on both Russia and Ukraine is quickly changing.

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Now, when Trump was out of power, he had a beef with the Republican Party because there were people who had studied policy in the world and the Republican Party who tried to steer his decision making in a way that reflected history and economics. And one of the weaknesses of Donald Trump, charisma. It’s his ego. And he feels he has to be the smartest person in the room at any given topic. 

So we all he was out of power. He restructured the Republican Party so that all of those folks were gone and basically turned it into an institution that was designed to glorify and reelect him. And it worked. He comes into power. He no longer has a cadre of several hundred people behind him to help him make policy. He just has a handful of people who, for their own personal reasons, have chosen to to hook up. 

And he has a cluster of Russian agents up to and including Tulsi Gabbard, who is currently the director of National Intelligence, who has been whispering in his ear and amending the national intelligence brief since day one with Russian propaganda. Well, as he comes in, he does the same thing to the federal bureaucracy that he did for the Republican Party and basically stripped it of expertise so that no one could ever tell him, you know, he was wrong. 

And what that meant is for the first six months, he was wrong a lot, especially as regards Vladimir Putin and the Ukraine war. We actually had some weird situations where Trump was blaming the Ukrainians for the Russian rape camps that had been set up, or the kidnaping of Ukrainian children, that the Russian government set up a cabinet level position to take care of, and the death camps and the mass murders and, you know, on and on and on. 

Using phosphorus to clear out village was, phosphorus is kind of like napalm. Anyway, turning point for Trump was in May and June. He engaged in personal diplomacy, with Vladimir Putin. He decided that, Steve Wyckoff, who had been his frontman, really didn’t know what he’s doing. And that was because Steve Wyckoff really didn’t know what he’s doing. 

And so Trump took it over directly. He couldn’t hand it off to the State Department because that is handled by, Rubio, who’s a guy he doesn’t particularly like. And actually, I’m a little surprised he hasn’t fired Rubio yet. He’s basically just sidelined the entire national, security and foreign service institutions. Put him under Rubio, then sent them off to the side and told them to do nothing. 

Anyway, he takes over the negotiations himself. So that puts Putin in a position where he’s lying to Trump’s face repeatedly and according to Trump’s own words, on six different occasions. We had a deal to end the war. And then less than 24 hours later, the Russians would bomb a civilian target. When I say bomb, I mean sending several dozen, several hundred drones and missiles and bombs into major cities. 

The first five times this happened. Trump seemed annoyed but willing to give Putin the benefit of the doubt. But the sixth time, the sixth time Melania Trump called Donald Trump out on it, and that apparently changed the minds. Keep in mind that Melania Trump was not born in the United States. She was born on the other side of the Iron Curtain in the former Yugoslavian republic of Slovenia. 

So she, among Trump’s inner circle now is the most aware of international relations of all, because she’s the only one who can’t be fired. How useful that will come to be in the days and weeks and months to come. I have no idea. But what she has done very successfully is convince Donald Trump that he was being played, that he was being lied to, and that he was being made to look quite unintelligent. 

And so a few weeks ago, the two weeks ago, Trump gave Vladimir Putin a 50 day deadline to change policy. And in the last 48 hours, Trump has said, I’m not going to give him 50 days because nothing’s changing and nothing will change. And that’s part of the problem with this conflict. Putin accurately sees the Ukraine war as the beginning of Russia’s last best chance to survive this century. 

From the Russian point of view, and I think the correct, if they cannot conquer all of these countries, not just Ukraine, the other 15 as well, Russia will vanish from the Earth before 2100 based on how the war goes, potentially a lot faster. So there can be no peace treaty that the Russians can agree to that they will enforce. 

That leaves any of these countries independent. This is a country that is fighting for its existence. Unfortunately for the Russians, in order to continue to exist, they have to conquer a number of people who collectively are of a greater number than there are Russian ethnics on this planet. So from the American and the European point of view, the question wasn’t will we or won’t we stand against the Russians? 

It’s where would we draw the line? Where is the point where we say no further? And for those of you who think that we can just wash our hands of this completely. A couple things to keep in mind. Number one, the Russians have more nukes than we do. And since they’re on their way out, the incentive to use them is a lot higher because from their point of view, in the long term, they have nothing to lose. 

Number two, if the line that we decide to defend is in Ukraine, well, then all of the Europeans and all of the Ukrainians are between the Russians and us. And the war to this point, the United States really hasn’t bled. We haven’t really provided much cash, and we haven’t provided much in terms of military equipment that we actually use. 

What the Ukrainians are using against the Russians, or at least until recently, has been American equipment that has been decommissioned since 1995. They are basically going through our hand-me-downs and holding the Russians off. And the cost to us is minimal. The alternative is, of course, to leave the Russians and the Ukrainians to it, break the alliance, go home, and just hope that in everything that happens with the conflict in the time to come, the Russians just forget that we have been the target of all of their nukes and all of their propaganda since 1935, and hope that should they ever be stopped by someone else, that on their way out the door of history, they 

choose not to send a few hundred nukes our way because they really do hate us massively. Anyway, for those of you who have bought the Russian propaganda, you’re going to have some uncomfortable times in the days ahead. Donald Trump’s ego has been bruised and he is now starting to direct policy against the Putin government. There are a thousand ways that this can go. 

I can’t predict the specifics. People like Tulsi Gabbard are still in place, who are still beating the drum on behalf of the Russians inside the white House. This can go a lot of strange directions, but hopefully this little brief gives you an idea of why things are happening the way that they are. And maybe, just maybe, it’ll make you reconsider a few things.