Why Trump’s Stance on Canada Makes Sense

Canadian flag flying over Parliament

The Trump administration’s tough stance on Canada isn’t as novel (or as arbitrary) as it may seem.

The US has always been cautious with neighbors on the northern border, from Britain in the past to modern Canada. This view follows the long-standing US strategic view that an independent power on the northern border could pose a security risk.

That caution is wise and should be applied to any potential economic integration as well. Merging the US and Canada might sound nice, but when you lift the hood…not so much. The US would be stuck with the financial burden of caring for Canada’s rapidly aging population.

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Hey everybody. Hello. From Rock Island Pass at the border between the Hoover Wilderness and Yosemite National Park. Today we’re taking a question from the Patreon crowd as we’re doing this whole trip. What what what what why? Why is the Trump administration hit Canada so much? Is there anything to it or or should we just whinge? That’s actually the specific text of the question. 

Let’s start by saying that there is is something to it and it goes beyond her. The Canadians burning our Capitol, back in the War of 1812. And you Canadians, you cannot pledge innocence from this. You know you did it. Yes. The Brits drove the car pool, but it was Ontarian Abrines that brought the torches to the party and actually burned the white House down. 

Now bigger picture. The United States is a large country that basically has the best parts of the continent. But that doesn’t mean that the United States is alone on the continent. Obviously, Canada is the entire northern frontier and throughout American history. If you go back to before reconstruction, the United States was always concerned that an extra hemispheric power would establish a beachhead somewhere in the vicinity of the North American continent and potentially use it to interrupt American power or maybe even launch an invasion. 

And of course, most recently and from the beginning, actually, Great Britain was the power of concern. Now, I don’t mean to suggest that there was a British invasion imminent or anything like that. Don’t put words in my mouth. I’m going to piss off enough people with this video as it is. But the idea that you can have an independent power right on America’s borders that doesn’t bear some degree of security risk is just silly. 

That doesn’t mean that I think that there’s a war around the corner, that it’s even inevitable. Certainly not imminent, but it’s not a blind policy decision to decide that you actually want all of the continent under a single flag. And both it for those of you to the south of us in Mexico, this applies to you as well. 

Now, that said, I think that the borders between the United States and its neighbors are fine. I’m not worried about an invasion. There’s good buffers, whether it’s, lakes and force in the north or deserts and mountains in the south. The population density of Canada certainly couldn’t do it by itself. Mexico maybe a little bit better. But northern Mexico is such a logistical snarl because of a lack of infrastructure. 

That too, I’m not concerned about. But the bottom line is, is that this didn’t come out of nowhere. This has been part of the American strategic view for 200 years, and to pretend otherwise is being a little bit windy. Now. That said, do I think we should do it? I think candidate even if they ask. No, because it’s bad math. 

When industrialization really got going roughly a century ago, people started moving from the farms and into the cities and they started having fewer kids. And that process was much more intense in Canada than it was in the United States, because I don’t know if you knew this, but can it gets cold in the winter. And so the Canadians basically huddled together in their cities for warmth, and there’s a much higher dense urbanization rate. 

Oh, got a message dense urbanization rate for Canadians than there is for Americans, which means that the Canadians of age are much slower. They’ve also probably played the immigration card as hard as they can. It’s starting to generate social disruption. And so the old Trudeau government and the new government have cracked down on immigration. Quite a bit, basically slowed it to a trickle. 

Oh, Mr. Popular, all of a sudden, which means that Canada is aging much, much, much quicker than the United States. And remember, in the United States, the baby boomers are already two thirds retired. So we know we face an explosion in social welfare payments over the next decade. Canada is ahead of us, and Canada lacks a millennial generation of size comparable to what we have south of the border. 

Which means if we were to do a merger of the Canadian provinces and the American states, it would be up to the United States to pay for the retirement of most Canadian citizens, most notably in Ontario, Quebec, and in the maritime provinces where the demographic decline is most advanced. So from a purely financial point of view, merging the two countries would be economic suicide for the United States. 

Let Canada pay for this. And if that means Canada pays for other things too, great.

While I Was Gone, Part 4: US Security

Shield of the Federal Bureau of Investigation

To wrap up this short series on things that went down while I was away, we’ll be looking at some alarming developments in US security.

The FBI raided former National Security Adviser John Bolton’s home and office, under accusations of mishandling classified documents; that’s a bit rich coming from the current administration, but I digress. The bigger issue is that using federal law enforcement as a political weapon mirrors authoritarian states like Russia and China. This relates to the other big news, where Trump has ordered the US military to form specialized units for patrolling American cities; this is just all-around bad policy.

If there was a time for Congress to assert itself as the adults in the room, it would be now.

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Hey all. Peter Zeihan here coming to you from the Lake of the Ozarks. This is the last in our series of. What the hell were you thinking while I was gone? Was I backpacking for two weeks? And the world kind of fell apart. This time we’re going to talk about security in the United States borders. There are two big things that went down when I was gone, both of which concern me greatly. 

The first involves a gentleman by the name of John Bolton. John Bolton was a national security adviser, which is kind of America’s top foreign policy coordinator during the first Trump administration. But after seeing how the sausage was made inside, he left the administration and basically became a critic and has now been one of the more reliable voices for saying when Donald Trump is doing something that perhaps isn’t the brightest. 

Well, while I was gone, the FBI was ordered to raid his business and raid his personal residence. And he has now been accused of improperly handling classified materials. The hypocrisy of this is pretty rich. Anyone who is, like, independently minded will be able to tell in a second that the Trump administration is the least information secure administration we’ve ever had. 

We’ve already had a number of cabinet ministers, up to including the vice president, included in signal checks, which is a Russian penetrated not particularly secure platform in which they shared operational data. We’ve had situations most recently in the, the Alaska summit where informations and the personal information of security and diplomatic personnel, including their contact information, was just left on a printer. 

And we’re seeing a general disregard for all the counselor generals, assuming they haven’t been fired already, which are the people who are supposed to maintain information security within the administration. So this administration is leaking classified information massively. We even have our DNI who’s in charge of the intelligence system. Outing covert covert agents around the world on Twitter. 

And so to accuse Bolton of doing something inappropriate with documents is is really rich, especially since he has been in government service in this sort of role for over 20 years and has never even had a hint of that concern brought up, ever. I mean, there’s a lot of reasons to not like John Bolton. Mostly political or personal. 

He’s not a particularly nice gentleman, but no one has ever accused him of not being competent. So that’s number one. Using the FBI as a hit squad for political opponents, is something the United States has never done. This is right out of modern China or 2000s. Russia, or maybe a Latin American democracy. This is not a great thing. 

The second thing which actually concerns me even more is what’s being done with the military. The US military is designed to do military operations overseas. They’re designed to kill people and detect threats. But Trump has given the order for the military to form specialized units designed to specifically patrol and pacify American urban centers. Now, the US military is not good at law enforcement, and it has never been trained to be good at law enforcement. 

Third thing is to get in a tank or getting a jet and go overseas and do things there. When you put them into a law enforcement role, like we saw, say, in the Iraq occupation, things go to hell really quickly. Their equipment’s not right for the training is not right for it. It’s a mismatch. And so a lot of people died that probably didn’t need to. 

You take those same people and you put them on American soil and tell them to do law enforcement. And we’re in a very different situation. The only governments in modern history that use their military for urban pacification are those countries where occupying their own people is a national security issue. This is Iran. This is, to a degree, Russia. 

This is to a degree, North Korea. This is not something we want to see. Not only would it be violent, not only will there be a lot of political degradation because of it, not only will this erode the US military’s capacity to function. It is by far the most expensive way that you could possibly do it, because you’re taking people that you’d like to say trained to work on an Abrams tank. 

It’s people that you probably cost at least a quarter of $1 million just to do their training and then beaten them. Beat cops? No. So we have this cascading list of economic and social and political and health and national security military issues that just in the last two weeks have taken an absolute nosedive. 

I’m not a call to action guy, but we’re nearing the point pretty quickly where if Congress cannot find a backbone to re inject some sanity into American policy, we’re going to be having some severe degradations in our economic, social, and military models that are literally going to take us decades to unfuck. This is getting very real.

Trump Trade Talks: Japan Gets a Deal

Photo of Japanese Yen

Japan is one of the few countries who has been willing to step into the batter’s box and take whatever Trump throws at them. This time at the plate, they were tossed a 15% tariff on Japanese goods (with some big caveats).

Tariffs on some of the most important exports, like cars and semiconductors, have been deferred for future negotiations. Which means Japan will be back at the plate in no time. The Japanese also pledged investment into US infrastructure via state-linked commodity institutions. Trump claims most of the profits will go to American pockets, but the Japanese disagree with that interpretation.

As is the running theme with most of Trump’s “trade deals”, this is predominantly fluff and the real talks are yet to begin.

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Peter Zeihan here, continuing our series on the new deals that the Trump administration has announced for trade with our major trading partners. Today, we’re going to tackle Japan. The Japanese situation is very similar to the European situation. And then it looks like the Trump administration, Donald Trump personally came up with a few numbers, walked into the room, said, I want this, this and this and this. 

And the Japanese nodded their head and smiled and say, sure. The headline figure for tariffs going, for, for goods coming from Japan. The United States is now 15%. And unlike in Europe, where there’s not a lot of back and forth in manufactured goods, to the degree that industrial substitution might happen with Japan, there’s a fair amount. 

Japan is an industrialized economy that doesn’t have a lot of consumption because of their demographic bomb. And so they export basic goods. Intermediate goods, processed goods and finished goods to the United States. So there’s a lot of room for things to move around if that ends up being the final number for the long term. 

But that’s probably not going to be the final number for the long term. The most interesting piece of the trade deal, as it’s currently been announced, is that on things like cars and semiconductors, those are going to be pushed off to another day. So even the Trump administration is saying that this is the beginning of the negotiations, not the end. 

Here’s the problem. Japan doesn’t make a whole lot of semiconductor, and the United States doesn’t make a huge number of semiconductors. But both of us absolutely dominate certain pieces of the supply chain. So the United States makes the silicon dioxide that basically goes into all of the world’s semiconductors. And we also do almost all of the design. The Japanese do some design, but they absolutely dominate the photo mask, which is, for lack of a better phrase, really fancy sunscreen. 

So when you were throwing the lasers at the chips, you can trim to different depths to achieve different things. These steps are not replicated in either country to the same degree that they would need to be. If you wanted to have a purely national semiconductor supply chain system. So the Trump administration, by pushing this off, is leaving unresolved the question of what the United States is. 

Semiconductor policy is going to be are we only interested in the last step, fabrication, which is what the Taiwanese do? Is that what we want? And we still want to bring in all the inputs that we need from the rest of the world, or do we want to completely indigenous semiconductor system. The first one is $100 billion question that would take 10 to 15 years. 

The second one is a $5 trillion question. That would take 20 to 40 years. And the Trump administration, to this point, hasn’t figured out how it wants to approach that, because that’s a huge tax, no matter which version of the question it’s going to be. And so things with Japan in that regard are being put off. Something similar is happening with drug manufacturing because the Japanese aren’t the ones that make the really cheap drugs. 

They make the more advanced drugs. And if you want to do that at home, you need a whole support chain going up to it. Okay, that’s kind of piece one. Piece two is a promise of investment, unlike the Europeans, where everything is done at the nation state level. And so negotiating with the European Union is a little loosey goosey. 

Japan is a sovereign nation. when you negotiate with Tokyo, you’re negotiating with Tokyo. And Japan is a country that over the course of the last 50 years, has realized that they have a poor system for raw material production and processing. So they’ve built a number of state entities to basically compensate for that. You basically throw state money at entities who are kind of relieve from the normal laws of supply and demand, and go out into the world and make investments that under normal circumstances, Americans wouldn’t make in order to source lithium or oil or whatever it happens to be, according to the terms of the current deal, those institutions will now start investing 

in American infrastructure in order to produce products in the United States. And 90% of the profits from those institutions will go to American entities. So two problems with that. Number one, these Japanese financial institutions that are government linked, they usually go into raw commodity production and processing. That’s not what Donald Trump said they’re going to do. 

He says they’re going to go into high end manufacturing. So already you’re talking about a significant shift in their mission and outside of their normal realm of expertise. The second problem is the idea that the Japanese will provide all of the money, but take hardly any of the profit. That’s a stretch. And as soon as Trump made these announcements, the Japanese like, that’s not what we agreed to at all. 

So unfortunately, in a similar manner to what we have going on with the European situation, this is the start of talks. This is the Trump declaration of what they want. Here we are. When this all started back on April 2nd. We’re now see May, June, July. We’re now three and a half months later. And we’re only now getting the initial declaration of what Donald Trump actually wants to see. 

Now, this is progress. But if you’re talking about the re fabrication of financial entities at the government level in Japan as the starting point for whatever this later deal is going to be, you’re still talking about projects that are going to be realized over the course of a decade or more. Not the sort of thing that can have any impact on things like the trade deficit on any meaningful time frame. 

We are once again, at the beginning of this process. We are nowhere near the end.

Trump Trade Talks: US-EU Strike a Deal

European Union Flags in front of a stormy sky

The Trump administration and the EU have announced a new trade deal. It’s more of a political headline than a meaningful agreement, but let’s break it down.

The agreement includes a 15% tariff on European goods, $750 billion in US energy exports to Europe over three years, and $500 billion in investments from EU institutions in US infrastructure. There is a lot to going on here, but the bottom line is that the “deal” was made with the EU, NOT the member countries. So, until the individual countries agree or decide to move forward with this…it’s just another wish list from Trump that’s not likely to go anywhere.

Up until now, these talks have just been political fluff. The structural issues in the US-EU trade relationship remain untouched and will stay like that until the real negotiations begin.

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Hey, I’m Peter Zeihan here, coming to you from a suddenly stormy Colorado. Today we’re launching off a new series on the status of the trade deals that the Trump administration has announced. We’re going to start with the European Union, which is by far the biggest. Now, Donald Trump has said this is the biggest trade deal ever. It doesn’t even make the top 25 list, actually, for the United States. 

And the problem is that a lot of the things that have supposedly been agreed to can’t happen. So, let’s start with the headline where we are at the moment. Then we’ll go into the detail. So the headline is that Trump was threatening the European Union with originally a 20% tariff, and that went up to 30%, then eventually 50%. 

And now it’s going to be 15%. And the Europeans agree to not retaliate, with their own tariffs. So there are a lot of folks across Europe who think that this is a particularly unfair deal. But, you know, whatever. 15% on European trade, Europe collectively is probably our fourth largest trading partner. That would have an impact on a lot of things. 

The United States and Europe have a relatively robust trading relationship that’s built on intermediate manufactured goods and then finished things like cars and aerospace that go both ways, as well as the United States sending a fair amount of energy products and processed materials, whether it’s lumber, cement or whatever. To the Europeans, the Europeans, of course, send a lot of luxury goods to the United States. 

French wine, of course, is on that list. Kentucky bourbon goes the other direction. You know, these are these are culturally intertwining trade types. And so throwing a 15% tariff on what’s coming from Europe to the United States is obviously going to require a squeeze in people’s budgets and redirect how things are going elsewhere. The thing to keep in mind, primarily when you’re talking about European trade, however, is that most of the stuff that we buy from Europe is not stuff that can really be sourced from other locations. 

So you’re either going to be looking at a reduction in demand as prices go up, or a withering of that trade relationship. So this is not one of those trade relationships where you’re going to see new industrial plant coming online in the United States to compensate. It’s not that kind of trade. That’s kind of the first piece. 

That’s the headline piece. That’s where we are. That all takes effect August 1st. The other two pieces are kind of loosey goosey and are very Trumpian. Trump has announced and the Europeans have said that, yes, this is broadly what we agreed to, that over the next three years, the Europeans will buy three quarters of $1 trillion in American energy products. 

Now, the energy product is defined very, very loosely to include things that don’t exist, like small modular nuclear reactors, or things that the Europeans just don’t buy from us like, for the most part, crude oil. Mostly we’re talking here about natural gas and liquefied form, but the number makes no sense. 

$750 billion in U.S. energy products over three years, the United States only exports a little over $300 billion of energy products total globally. So the idea that all of a sudden it’s all going to be and go to the United States, that would actually be a massive reduction in the take home pay for U.S. energy exporters. Right now, U.S. LNG exporters in particular, are in kind of the catbird seat because they look to see whoever is having a crunch, and then they send LNG there. 

So they get spot prices that are very, very, very high. If we were to send everything to the continent of Europe, we would be talking about more term contracts where the renumeration cost would be significantly lower because of the reliability. You would probably see U.S. LNG exporters see their profits drop by well over two thirds. And you’d probably drive a quarter of them out of the business if this agreement were to happen, which it won’t, because the European Union is not an economic entity. 

It is an international political organization among the member states. And the member states are the ones who decide what they buy from where. So the EU, the European Union institution, the executive arm, has committed to buy in the stuff, but their annual budget for the entire European Union is under $200 billion a year. So no, this is not going to happen at all. 

And if it did happen, it would be really bad for American energy exporters. That’s problem. One problem too, is that supposedly there’s going to be a half $1 trillion of investment by European entities in the United States. And again, the EU is a political institution that doesn’t have that kind of budget. It has agreed on behalf of the member states, but the member states are under no legal liability whatsoever to actually carry out the agreement. 

So what’s probably going to happen is a few months from now, these talks will continue again, because this is not a final deal. This is a memorandum of understanding for what the Trump administration would like to see happen. And even if this was a final deal, it would then have to be ratified by all the member states. But the EU institutions don’t have the political or legal authority to negotiate for their member states on behalf of things like energy and investment treaties. 

That is a bilateral deal. Those talks have not even begun. And from what we’re hearing from both the Trump administration and from Brussels, is that Trump basically came into the room with a few numbers, said, I want this, this, this, and this. And the Europeans kind of nod and smiled, assuming that this would end the conversation for the moment, which appears to be what has happened. 

But in terms of the real talks, the things that might address the irritants in the relationship, of which there are many, those haven’t even started.

Why Trump’s Stance on Ukraine Has Changed – Part 2

Ukraine solider on a armored vehicle with a split screen of Donald Trump

Let’s unpack Trump’s evolving stance on Ukraine a bit more today.

Trump came into his second term strapped with his loyalty vacuum, purging anyone who wouldn’t kiss the ring. This left Trump with a lackluster roster, many of whom had acquired a taste for Russian propaganda. All of that led to Trump giving Putin an extraordinarily long leash.

After six broken promises of peace, Melania talked some reality into Trump, and he is now pulling back on the lead. The question now is not whether to oppose Russia, but where to draw the line. US support for Ukraine has come cheaply so far, but nuclear retaliation from Russia is still looming on the horizon.

We still don’t know where Trump will take this, but his stance on both Russia and Ukraine is quickly changing.

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Now, when Trump was out of power, he had a beef with the Republican Party because there were people who had studied policy in the world and the Republican Party who tried to steer his decision making in a way that reflected history and economics. And one of the weaknesses of Donald Trump, charisma. It’s his ego. And he feels he has to be the smartest person in the room at any given topic. 

So we all he was out of power. He restructured the Republican Party so that all of those folks were gone and basically turned it into an institution that was designed to glorify and reelect him. And it worked. He comes into power. He no longer has a cadre of several hundred people behind him to help him make policy. He just has a handful of people who, for their own personal reasons, have chosen to to hook up. 

And he has a cluster of Russian agents up to and including Tulsi Gabbard, who is currently the director of National Intelligence, who has been whispering in his ear and amending the national intelligence brief since day one with Russian propaganda. Well, as he comes in, he does the same thing to the federal bureaucracy that he did for the Republican Party and basically stripped it of expertise so that no one could ever tell him, you know, he was wrong. 

And what that meant is for the first six months, he was wrong a lot, especially as regards Vladimir Putin and the Ukraine war. We actually had some weird situations where Trump was blaming the Ukrainians for the Russian rape camps that had been set up, or the kidnaping of Ukrainian children, that the Russian government set up a cabinet level position to take care of, and the death camps and the mass murders and, you know, on and on and on. 

Using phosphorus to clear out village was, phosphorus is kind of like napalm. Anyway, turning point for Trump was in May and June. He engaged in personal diplomacy, with Vladimir Putin. He decided that, Steve Wyckoff, who had been his frontman, really didn’t know what he’s doing. And that was because Steve Wyckoff really didn’t know what he’s doing. 

And so Trump took it over directly. He couldn’t hand it off to the State Department because that is handled by, Rubio, who’s a guy he doesn’t particularly like. And actually, I’m a little surprised he hasn’t fired Rubio yet. He’s basically just sidelined the entire national, security and foreign service institutions. Put him under Rubio, then sent them off to the side and told them to do nothing. 

Anyway, he takes over the negotiations himself. So that puts Putin in a position where he’s lying to Trump’s face repeatedly and according to Trump’s own words, on six different occasions. We had a deal to end the war. And then less than 24 hours later, the Russians would bomb a civilian target. When I say bomb, I mean sending several dozen, several hundred drones and missiles and bombs into major cities. 

The first five times this happened. Trump seemed annoyed but willing to give Putin the benefit of the doubt. But the sixth time, the sixth time Melania Trump called Donald Trump out on it, and that apparently changed the minds. Keep in mind that Melania Trump was not born in the United States. She was born on the other side of the Iron Curtain in the former Yugoslavian republic of Slovenia. 

So she, among Trump’s inner circle now is the most aware of international relations of all, because she’s the only one who can’t be fired. How useful that will come to be in the days and weeks and months to come. I have no idea. But what she has done very successfully is convince Donald Trump that he was being played, that he was being lied to, and that he was being made to look quite unintelligent. 

And so a few weeks ago, the two weeks ago, Trump gave Vladimir Putin a 50 day deadline to change policy. And in the last 48 hours, Trump has said, I’m not going to give him 50 days because nothing’s changing and nothing will change. And that’s part of the problem with this conflict. Putin accurately sees the Ukraine war as the beginning of Russia’s last best chance to survive this century. 

From the Russian point of view, and I think the correct, if they cannot conquer all of these countries, not just Ukraine, the other 15 as well, Russia will vanish from the Earth before 2100 based on how the war goes, potentially a lot faster. So there can be no peace treaty that the Russians can agree to that they will enforce. 

That leaves any of these countries independent. This is a country that is fighting for its existence. Unfortunately for the Russians, in order to continue to exist, they have to conquer a number of people who collectively are of a greater number than there are Russian ethnics on this planet. So from the American and the European point of view, the question wasn’t will we or won’t we stand against the Russians? 

It’s where would we draw the line? Where is the point where we say no further? And for those of you who think that we can just wash our hands of this completely. A couple things to keep in mind. Number one, the Russians have more nukes than we do. And since they’re on their way out, the incentive to use them is a lot higher because from their point of view, in the long term, they have nothing to lose. 

Number two, if the line that we decide to defend is in Ukraine, well, then all of the Europeans and all of the Ukrainians are between the Russians and us. And the war to this point, the United States really hasn’t bled. We haven’t really provided much cash, and we haven’t provided much in terms of military equipment that we actually use. 

What the Ukrainians are using against the Russians, or at least until recently, has been American equipment that has been decommissioned since 1995. They are basically going through our hand-me-downs and holding the Russians off. And the cost to us is minimal. The alternative is, of course, to leave the Russians and the Ukrainians to it, break the alliance, go home, and just hope that in everything that happens with the conflict in the time to come, the Russians just forget that we have been the target of all of their nukes and all of their propaganda since 1935, and hope that should they ever be stopped by someone else, that on their way out the door of history, they 

choose not to send a few hundred nukes our way because they really do hate us massively. Anyway, for those of you who have bought the Russian propaganda, you’re going to have some uncomfortable times in the days ahead. Donald Trump’s ego has been bruised and he is now starting to direct policy against the Putin government. There are a thousand ways that this can go. 

I can’t predict the specifics. People like Tulsi Gabbard are still in place, who are still beating the drum on behalf of the Russians inside the white House. This can go a lot of strange directions, but hopefully this little brief gives you an idea of why things are happening the way that they are. And maybe, just maybe, it’ll make you reconsider a few things.

Why Trump’s Stance on Ukraine Has Changed – Part 1

Ukraine solider on a armored vehicle with a split screen of Donald Trump

It seems that the Trump administration might be listening to some classic rock lately, because his recent stance on Russia and Putin is awfully reminiscent of The Who’s 1971 classic “Won’t Get Fooled Again.” Or maybe Melania just yelled at him.

The issue with the Trump and Putin dynamic is that they’ve been operating on two different playing fields. Trump thought he was just caught up in your standard playground pissing contest (the kind of conflict that he loves). Putin was playing along, but Trump is finally realizing that Putin’s war on Ukraine is existential. The Russians MUST take Ukraine. They MUST expand their borders. Otherwise, it’s the end of Russia as we know it.

This is the geographic playbook that Russia has always followed. Now that their demographic crisis has reached critical mass, there is only one path forward. So, Trump’s stance on Ukraine is starting to shift, but this is only the beginning.

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Hey, all Peter Zeihan here coming to you from Colorado. Today we’re doing an educational video for folks who are of the MAGA crowd who, are discovering that the Trump administration is changing policy pretty dramatically on them in the case of Ukraine. 

When Trump was running for president, the third time to get a second term, he started repeating a lot of Russian propaganda about how the war was Ukraine’s fault. And Zelensky needs to go. Then he came in and discovered, that things perhaps were not, as he realized. So the point of this video is to explain to you what Trump has discovered over the last six months and why it’s leading to his policy change. This war was always going to happen. It didn’t happen because of who the American president was, or the German chancellor or the Ukrainian president. 

It happened because of how the Russians view their world. The Russian territories are pretty flat and open, and there’s no real good spot to hunker behind to shield yourself the armies of your foes. And so, Russian strategy going back to the time of the early czars, you know, centuries ago, has been to expand. 

Conquer the people next to you, subjugate them, turn them into cannon fodder, and then use them as a vanguard to attack the next group of people. And repeat and repeat and repeat until eventually you reach a geographic border that tanks can’t go through. And so Muscovite expanded into Tatarstan, expanded into Ukraine, expanded into the Baltics. And they keep going until they hit those geographic barriers. 

And the key ones are the Baltic Sea, the Carpathian Mountains, the deserts of Central Asia, and the tension mountains of Central Asia and the Caucasus. If the Russians, from their point of view, can do this, then they will have achieved a degree of physical security that they could not get from remaining at home. And the Russian leader, who ultimately proved most successful at doing this in the modern age is Joseph Stalin. 

And the borders that the Soviet Union held during the Cold War were the most secure that the Russians have ever been. You just have to keep in mind a few things here. Russia is not a nation state like Germany or the United States or Australia. It’s a multi-ethnic empire where the non Russian ethnics exist solely to serve as a ballast. 

And it’s cannon fodder in wars, which means that in times of prolonged economic or political decay, like, say, the 1980s, the empire breaks apart and all of the various nationalities that used to be used as cannon fodder all of a sudden are the on the other side of an international border. So Russia has only about, 60%, 65% of the territory of the Soviet Union. 

But all of those other zones are largely populated, and they’re populated with ethnicities that are not simply hostile to Moscow, but have been subjugated to Moscow in the past. Now, modern day, the Russian population is dying out. There are two big things that shape demographics, and the first is the degree of urbanization. And the second is economic, where for all and health. 

So first, urbanization starting under Stalin, but really getting serious under Brezhnev, the Soviets started a massive urbanization campaign, basically taking people off the farm and cramming them into small housing units. And in doing so, birthrates dropped by 80% in two generations. At the same time, this agrarian population was not really schooled up to deal with the realities of the industrial age. 

And you had a lot of people who became functionally dispossessed. One of the results among many, was insane levels of alcoholism. Then when the Soviet system collapsed in 1989, heroin became a big problem along with multidrug resistant tuberculosis and HIV. And so, arguably, the Russian population of the 2020 tens and today is the least healthy in the world. 

And one of the ones that has faced so low of birth rates for so long that the actual ethnicity of Russians is vanishing. These two trends come together in the Ukraine war. 

First, the Putin government has tried to expand on the cheap through the 2000, sponsoring coups and assassinating people throughout the what they call their near abroad. Throughout the 2020 tens, trying to shape the political space of these countries that they used to control in order to force them to do what Moscow wants. 

And they were always able to find collaborators among these countries who could be bought off, or maybe even wished for the return of Russian troops. But they could never convince the majority of the population that existing to serve Russian goals was in their best interests. And so the result among many, were things like color revolutions, where the peoples of these countries, it would basically rose up and throw off the pro Russian puppets. 

And then the second problem demographics is that the Russian birthrate has been so low for so long, the Russians are losing the capacity to field an army of their own, and they don’t control enough subject peoples anymore to generate a large conscript army full of cannon fodder. So the late 2020s, where we are now, was always going to be the last period where there were enough ethnic Russian men in their 20s where making a go of a military solution could happen. 

These two things come together. And the Ukraine war with the Putin government basically going all in. It was always going to happen. It was always going to happen about now. The only question is, how does the rest of the world in general and the United States specifically react to it? Because remember, the Russians will keep going until they reach a geographic barrier that can stop tanks. 

Ukraine’s only part of that. Ukraine is the ninth post-Soviet war that the Russians have participated in. And it will not be the last. We will also, if Ukraine falls, have conflicts in Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Romania, Kazakhstan, Georgia, Azerbaijan and probably Uzbekistan as well. This is just the next phase of Putin’s plan of the Russian plan, that if anything was written 500 years ago.

Inflation Ticks Up Under Trump-2

a vacuum sucking up dollar bills

We spoke about monetary policy last week, but let’s lift the hood. Today, we’ll be discussing the inflation outlook under Trump’s second term, focusing on tariffs, immigration, and supply chain disruptions.

We’re seeing inflation climb. The consumption-led recession has begun, and as Trump’s tariffs continue to roll out, things will only worsen. Labor shortages, driven by immigration enforcement, are pushing labor costs up. And the impacts to global supply chains are hitting housing, food, and transport.

With a dysfunctional Congress, an understaffed administration, and a Republican party with no real plan…prices will continue to tick up and instability will deepen.

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Peter Zeihan here. Coming to you from a humid Colorado morning. We’re not used to getting this kind of rain this time of year. Anyway, today we’re going to talk about inflation and what you can expect in the weeks and months ahead. Now, if you remember back, I have been saying since roughly April that, the United States was looking at a consumption led recession in July, and we are in July now. 

And the reason is good shortages. The tariffs that Trump put in on April 2nd basically triggered an end to all exports from China, the United States. And China is our number one source of consumer goods. And that ban functionally ban was in place for several weeks. And so nothing left. Everyone’s been living on inventories in July is when I expected starting on the West coast and then moving its way east us to basically start running out of stuff. 

And that’ll manifest in inflation numbers. Consumption numbers. The data is very loosey goosey because Trump, like he always does, set a very harsh penalty in early April. And then by the time we got to late May had basically rescinded all of it pending further negotiations, which, by the way, are not happening and not going anywhere. We’re now in a second phase of that where Trump is saying that after his grace period expires, tariffs are going to come back in. 

And for most countries, the numbers that he has floated are significant, higher than what he threatened to back in April, suggesting that on the worst case scenario. These tariffs happen as he’s talking about. And we just have a crushing of economic activity and consumer basis around the country. Best case scenario is that he keeps doing this on and off, on and off tariffs where we only have a problem with business uncertainty, which eventually hits industrial development and employment. 

But that’s a longer term problem for right now. Let’s talk about inflation. 

The US CPI, which for many reasons isn’t the best measure, but it’s really the best that we have that we can assess regularly. Is the consumer price index. And it generally puts out a statement once a month about where inflation is going. The newest numbers that came out of June are 2.7%, which is significantly higher than what we’ve had in the next few months before because the tariffs are starting to kick in. 

But you shouldn’t expect the CPI to skyrocket just because of tariffs. Your spending falls into a lot of different buckets, and most of them aren’t goods. In fact, about 60% of total spending is on services. And for services to have significant increases in prices, you have to have a feed through effect that affects goods first and also hits the labor market. 

Now, if we’re getting that on the labor market, it’s an immigration issue with the Trump administration now saying they’re not just going to go after people who with criminal records are not just going to be going after people who are actually working, but keeping the nose clean, but happen to be here illegally. They’re also going to go after people with legal protected status and canceling it on shipping them all out. And now that the big beautiful bill is passed, there is funding available to expand the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement. So we should see significant expansions, in labor costs moving forward in an environment where we already have record low unemployment. So this will just feed straight through into inflation. So that’s going to be a problem throughout the services sector for goods. 

More specifically there’s three categories to watch. The first and by far the most important. And how is housing. It’s roughly one third of the entire index. You want to build a house, you need four things aluminum, steel, copper and labor. And between the tariffs and the immigration crackdown, the Trump administration has severely constricted the availability of all four of those things, which is grossly retarded New builds. 

We’ve seen about a 10% drop in new housing starts since Trump became president. And this is before most of these tariffs even kick in and before the anti-immigration pulse gets really, really strong. So we’re going to be seeing some significant increases in housing prices over the remainder of the year and into the next. 

Keep in mind that once you fix these input problems, it generally takes a couple of years before you see meaningful increases in housing builds, because you have to wait for companies to reform. It took us a good six years to recover from the financial crisis and the subprime boom. It won’t take us this long based on how bad the policies get, but this is not something where you just turn a key and all of a sudden you’re back in business. 

Next up is food. We still don’t have food tariffs. Trump keeps promising and he says they’re right around the corner. They’re going to be 40%. But they haven’t happened yet. And until they do. The biggest problem with food prices is immigration. Again, because most of the harvesting of things like fruits and vegetables and most of the processing of meats is done by immigrant labor and the Trump administration has started directing Immigration and Customs Enforcement to raid the sites where people would show up for work and sometimes even raid meatpacking plants themselves. 

And we’ve already had a number of facilities shut down because of that, because they can’t find Americans to do the job. Number one, Americans don’t want to do the job. Number two, there aren’t any Americans to do the job. Remember, record low unemployment. We have a labor crunch. Third, let’s see. We did the housing. We did food, transport. 

Food and transport are both about 13% of the index. And transport really comes down to cars and trucks. And here’s something where we’re all going to be feeling it really soon. The new tariffs that Trump has threatened against Canada and Mexico were over 30%. And most vehicles that are made in North America are made as a team effort with, say, carburetors coming from the United States, engine blocks from Mexico, spark plugs from Canada. 

Things go back and forth and back and forth and back and forth and back and forth. And in a tariff environment, that model dies almost overnight. There have been numerous extensions to everything. So I’m not saying convincingly that this is what’s going to happen. Because Trump keeps changing his mind. But if these tariffs go in, there will be no more American made cars functionally, because it’ll be cheaper to make cars abroad and then ship them in and just pay the tariff once instead of having to pay it on every part, more or less. 

You’re basically looking at American cars becoming the most expensive vehicles in the American market and out of the reach of most lower and middle income people. One more, drugs. About 5% of the CPI is medications of some form. Trump has announced, without a implication date, a 200% tariff on all imported medications. 

Now, this is both indirectly smart and directly dumb. First of directly dumb. There are a lot of high end medications that come from Europe that simply will be unaffordable. And under things like Medicaid and any sort of insurance that you can get, they simply will be ignored completely because no one will be able to fund them. On the lower end, though, your maintenance medications, your lisinopril and things like that. 

There’s an argument to be made there that terrorists might be part of a tool kit that would improve drug availability. Right now, all of these easy to make pills that are less than a nickel a pop, are typically made in China and in India. And this has been the case for roughly a decade. And so reshoring that to the United States makes a lot of sense from a medical security and a national security point of view. 

And while the cost will undoubtedly go up probably more than double, it’s from such a low base that I don’t think a lot of people are going to really feel it too much. The reason I’m a little bit hesitant this is even in Donald Trump’s mind, is the last time that this was a top of mind issue. 

It was during Covid when the situation was the same, and there was a moment early in Covid when the Democrats, the Republicans and the Trump administration were all on the same page on what needed to be done, and Trump couldn’t be bothered to provide the leadership to make it happen. Now we have a broken Congress. We have a broken Republican Party. 

We have a scattered Democratic Party and a Trump administration that hasn’t staffed up yet. So the idea that there’s a phase two to the plan beyond big tariffs, I find really dubious because it’s now been five months since Trump became president and we haven’t seen that anywhere.

A Ukraine-US Deal?

Volodymyr Zelensky and Donald Trump shaking hands from wikimedia: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Volodymyr_Zelensky_and_Donald_Trump_2019-09-25_01.jpg

Trump and Zelensky recently had a call where they discussed a mega-deal, centered around mutual weapons purchases and military tech sharing.

There is a lot for both countries to gain from a potential deal. The US gets access to all the military tech Ukraine has developed and gets to see it tested on a live battlefield. Ukraine gets the industrial power of the US and, of course, some much needed funding.

These are early days, but when the guy in charge is just after a deal, rather than all the important details…there’s no telling how this will shake out.

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Hey everybody, Peter Zeihan here. Coming to you from Colorado. A quick one today. 

Today is the 17th of July and supposedly Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, and Trump, the United States just had a phone call and Zelensky said it was all about a drone. Mega-deal the idea that Kiev will buy some weapons from Washington, and Washington will buy some weapons from Kiev. 

Now, if you go back to the Soviet period, the heart of the aerospace and missile systems in the former Soviet Union was in what is today Ukraine. And in the post-Soviet settlement, the Russians got all of the weapons, but the Ukrainians kept all of the scientists. And so once the Ukraine war began about four years ago, the Russians obviously came in big and strong with all the weapons and the Ukraine’s never much. 

But then the Ukrainians started to turn on their old Braintrust trained up their younger population and get into new weapons systems. And they’re standing to offer to any country is if you put troops in Ukraine, we will share all of the technologies that we have developed with you. And those technologies are pretty robust. So just to pick a few. 

You’ve got the Neptune missiles that sank the Russian flagship out in the Black Sea. You’ve got the rocket drones with a range of just under a thousand miles. You’ve got new loitering drones can go further than that. And of course, this wave of first person drones that we’ve seen more and more and more of. But increasingly, we’re seeing jet skis with missiles on them that are automated. 

Basically, they’re taking the automation revolution and marrying it to a new type of warfare and serving as a testbed. Because from the point that they actually finished constructing a prototype, it’s usually used within a week, and then they immediately start to iterate. So the speed at which the Ukrainians have been pushing the envelope is really impressive. Their problem is resources. 

So at the beginning of the Ukraine war, something like 5 to 10% of their weapons systems were actually manufactured in Ukraine. That number is now over 60% and continues to rise. So if the United States were to get access to that technological suite and the development pipeline, and you marry that to the U.S. industrial plant in the US taxpayer base, well, a lot of really interesting stuff could happen very, very quickly. 

We’re still in early days, but we all know that Trump doesn’t like to talk about details. He just wants a deal. So if the Americans are willing to put some money into this, you’re looking at a fairly short turnaround time for a significant overhaul. First of the Ukrainian military is the resources come in and then eventually the American military, as well as these technologies reach the precision, the range and the rugged ization that the US military demands. 

How much? How fast? I mean, that is entirely up to the two presidents. But one of the things that Ukrainians were very successful at doing was building out their industrial plant in order to make these new weapons and design these new weapons and test these new weapons. But probably about half of that industrial plant is sitting empty because of a lack of resources, which is where the United States could plug right in.

What Happens After Trump and Putin Split?

Split Screen of Putin and Trump with a question mark

On Monday, I talked about the impending breakup between Putin and Trump, and the “plan” that Trump has laid out following the split. But the fallout from this relationship isn’t so straightforward.

There’s a 50-day horizon for Russia and Ukraine to sign a peace deal before the tariffs on everything Russian kick in, but that’s just the beginning of the logistical nightmare for Trump.

With a hollowed-out government and a lineup of Witkoff, Gabbard, and Vance to deal with, real policy change is just a distant glimmer that Trump might not ever see. Unless, of course, Trump welcomes experts with open arms, rebuilds his foreign policy team, and let’s someone into the room who is smarter than him…

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Hey, everybody. Peter Zeihan here. Coming to you from Colorado. And today we’re gonna talk about Donald Trump and Russia and Ukraine, war and tariffs and sanctions and blah, blah, blah. So in the last couple of days, Donald Trump has gone out publicly and said repeatedly that he’s really pissed off at Vladimir Putin because Vladimir Putin has been saying all the nice things, and then it’s all bullshit. 

And he just continues the war. Now, anyone who has been following the Ukraine war at all, or really Russian relations for the last 35 years, knows that this is not a new thing. The Russians lie a lot. And on the Ukraine war specifically, they feel that this is a strategic issue for them and they will say anything to continue the conflict. 

They will continue not just until they have conquered all of Ukraine, but until they’ve gotten a number of countries further to the west. Donald Trump came in saying that he knows Putin very well and he can negotiate a truce in a day, and obviously things have not worked out that way. And so with every stage, Putin is basically lied to Trump more and more and more, and it has made Trump look like a fool in the eyes of the international community, and not just a few Republicans back at home in the United States. 

And it seems that in the last couple of weeks that has finally reached a critical mass. So the current threat from Donald Trump is if in 50 days, Vladimir Putin has not agreed to some sort of ceasefire and peace deal, details TBD, then there will be a 50 to 100% tariff on everything from Russia and an another 50 to 100% tariff on anyone who buys stuff from Russia. 

Now, the logistics of implementing this would be colorful, because we don’t have an institution in the United States to handle things. Secondary sanctions, especially not at that kind of volume, because it would apply, among other things, to China. But let’s just assume for the moment that Trump is serious about this, for this to happen. Three things have to go down in the Trump cabinet because remember, remember, remember, Donald Trump has the least staffed government in American history, still hasn’t filled out over 90% of the appointed positions. 

He is the least capable and least competent national security team, and the one person on his national security team actually knows what’s what is the Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, who’s been pushed to the side and really has no impact on meaningful policy. So there’s three personalities you need to watch how Trump interacts with them. The first one is a guy named Steve Witkoff who does not belong in government at all. 

He is a real estate developer in New York. He’s an old buddy of Trump, and Trump has been throwing about every international issue the Ukraine, Russian negotiations, the Iranian negotiations, the Israeli guys and corrections of this guy knows nothing about any of it. And it’s obvious because as soon as he gets into the room, whichever group happens to have the best PR basically twists them around their little finger and gets him to spout their propaganda up to and including in Donald Trump’s ear. 

That is absolutely how the Russian situation has evolved, which is the primary reason why Trump looks so dumb when he’s talking about Ukraine and Russia specifically, and in foreign affairs in general. So Witkoff probably has now been edged out because it’s difficult to imagine how Donald Trump would have had a change of heart to this degree if Witkoff were still being allowed in the room. 

Time will tell, but it looks like he’s already gone. That’s number one. Number two, the director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard. Tulsi Gabbard, has been a Russian plant and a Russian agent long, long before she joined the government. Long, long before she became a Republican. She used to be a Democrat. And part of the presidential debate briefings were about how she was somebody who was probably already on the Russian payroll. 

And even if you don’t believe any of that, look at her foreign policy stances. If it involves the United States. Tulsi Gabbard has been on the opposite side of the United States on all issues regarding China and North Korea and Iran and Syria and Libya and, of course, Russia going back 20 years. And one of the first things that she did when she took over as DNI was to basically fire everyone on the Russian desk who would tell the truth to the president. 

And then she spent most of her time going through whatever had been published and redacting it, to put it in Russian propaganda and Russian propaganda. To this day remains her primary source of information. So if she’s not specifically and directly working for Vladimir Putin, then the Venn diagram that represents their worldviews is almost a perfect circle. It’s probably 99% overlap, with the remaining 1% being hairstyles because Putin is bald. 

And Tulsi Gabbard, I will give this to her. Her hair is fabulous. Number three Vance J.D. Vance is part of a group of people that are directly in the U.S. government, or one foot in, one foot out, like, say, Elon Musk, who are a certain flavor of white, ultra nationalist, Christian, ultra nationalist, based on how you want to phrase that. 

Anyway, they see Russia as the great white hope, as the country that has been suffering and pushing to protect the white race. Now, of course, that is unmitigated bullshit because the Russians are equal opportunity genocides and the Ukrainians are whiter than the Russians. But he’s the vice president, and he can’t just be pushed to the side and set out to pasture like, say, Witkoff. 

And even somebody like, say, Tulsi Gabbard can just be fired on a whim. Vice president is a little different. Even if formerly officially, the president can just fire the VP, which there would be a court case. Congress is going to get involved one way or the other. It’s a big step for Trump to turn on Vance. Now, I’m not saying that any of these are going to happen. I’m saying that this is what has to go down. If we’re going to see a meaningful change in foreign policy out of this administration on the question of Ukraine and Russia, now, does that change need to happen? 

Oh dear God, yes. We’ve had some really disastrous decisions made on national security as regard this topic. But even if all three of those people were suddenly gone, it doesn’t really solve the overall problem. Trump has a real issue with letting people in the room who know more about a topic than he does. That’s one of the reasons why the government is so lightly staffed. 

That’s one of the reasons why Rubio has been banished to the sideline. And so he would have to do one of two things. Number one, he’d have to dedicate his entire presidency to this one question, because this is this is a lot. And just keeping up to date on it would be robust, especially if you don’t have any deputies. 

Or number two, we’d have to see him turn the page back quite a ways to something that more resembled what he did in the first Trump presidency, when he brought in lots of people from the national security establishment and from the Republican Party, and actually stepped up a proper government. Now, that didn’t work very well, because as soon as I said anything that made him feel little or unintelligent, he fired them. 

But the whole point of being a good leader is to know what you don’t know when. Surround yourself with people who do. No, he hasn’t done that. If he starts to do that, then we’re looking at a very different presidency. But there’s a saying about carts and horses, and we are not there yet.

Copper Imports Slapped with 50% Tariff

Copper tubing

I know it feels like we’re all trapped in a Sisyphean nightmare with all the discussions of tariffs, but don’t shoot the messenger. Trump’s latest move is a 50% tariff on copper imports is going to do a lot of harm.

You all know that the US needs to build out its industrial capacity in the face of deglobalization, and copper happens to be an important part of that. Building domestic copper production would take over a decade and all these pesky tariffs are only extending that timeline.

Prefer to read the transcript? Click here

Transcript

Hey, all Peter Zeihan here come from Colorado… hiking season. Unfortunately, I can still get the news, so I know that we now have a 50% tariff courtesy of Donald Trump. That is going to be coming to copper imports beginning on August 1st. Let’s say that you are someone who is really concerned about the US copper industry. 

I am not. I’m really not. But if you are, there are a few things that you do before you get larger volumes of copper from domestic production. Number one, you go out and explore to find the deposit you’re after. Number two, you build physical infrastructure, road and rail to get to that system that can handle heavy freight. 

Third, you build a processing facility to separate the copper ore from the rest of the rock and then an intermediate processing facility to turn it to something called blister copper, which is roughly 98% pure. It gets rid of a lot of the sulfur. You then take that blister copper, and you take it to another facility that you need to build. 

That’s a proper smelter that will turn it into that, you know, the reddish orange shiny stuff that you use in everything. And then copper then goes on to be in almost everything that involves electricity. So it is an important material. But putting a 50% tariff on it on the front end retards that entire process. And from start to finish, the entire process takes somewhere between 10 and 15 years. 

So if your goal was to facilitate copper production, step one, would it be offer, say, tax credits for exploration? Go ahead and build the physical infrastructure and get started on the smelters. All of that is very power intensive. So you all sort of need some more electricity. By putting the tariff on the front end, you’re basically retarding the whole process rather than speeding it. 

That’s a problem. One. Problem two is that the Chinese are literally dying out. And while they are big players in the copper sector, and that will have to be shut out at some point, that’s not my primary concern at this point. My primary concern is we have a limited amount of time in the United States to build out our industrial plant to prepare for the Chinese just not being there, and that means roughly doubling the size of the industrial plant. 

And for that first stage, doubling the size. There are four main inputs that you need. The first one is copper that now costs 50% more than it used to or will on August 1st. The second item is steel, primarily but not exclusively for structure and interior structure support. I think I-beams that, courtesy of an existing a Trump tariff, is now 50% more than it used to be. 

Third is aluminum, primarily, but not exclusively used in cladding and especially Hvac systems. That is now 60% more than it used to be because of Trump tariffs. And the fourth thing you need is a labor force that’s willing to do the construction work. Now in the United States, historically, for the last 40 years, most of that work has been done by immigrants from Mexico. 

And Central America. But as you may have noticed, the Trump administration has basically launched a poll grim against illegal migrants. Now, I don’t want to get into a broad debate of the pros and cons of immigration at this moment, but let’s just talk about where this policy in its current form leads. The Trump administration wants to deport about a million people a year, which carried out for a few years, would basically remove the illegal migrant community in its entirety construction is the industry that they are most involved in. 

Agriculture is number two. And what the Trump administration has discovered is that going after people who have committed crimes, it’s actually kind of hard because it’s a law enforcement issue and you have to do investigations and arrest them one at a time. That’s not going to get you to a million people. So instead, they’re going after people that they know about. 

They’re going to churches. They’re revoking legal status for people who say, I’ve been brought in from Venezuela or Haiti out of economic or political persecution. They’re going to people’s court hearings where they’re going to get ruled on for a, say, a green card and arresting them before they can before the judge, because, you know, these are people where they know where they are. 

So the four inputs that we need to prepare for a post China world are now more expensive. And every time the cost of something goes up, you can do less of it. So if these policies continue for any appreciable amount of time, we can test that economic boom that I’ve been talking about for years. Goodbye. Because we will not have the industrial plant that is necessary to produce the goods. 

We need to continue to lead the lives that we have been leading. It’s almost as if a Russian agent was whispering things in Trump’s ear and trying to convince them to do the things that would be most against our best interests. Oh, wait.