Peter Zeihan, Author at Zeihan on Geopolitics

Much Higher Interest Rates for Much, Much Longer

THIS IS YOUR LAST CHANCE TO REGISTER FOR TODAY’S WEBINAR ON THE STATE OF GLOBAL ENERGY!

TODAY at 12:00 PM EST Peter will deliver his analysis and forecasts for regional energy production and his assessment of geopolitical risk—everything from war, to instability and regulatory risk—with an eye on challenges and opportunities facing global production and supply.

Click the link below to register!

Who doesn’t love spending their morning trying to understand what the Federal Reserve is doing? Oh, no takers? Well, let’s at least look at inflation trends and where I expect interest rates to go.

Thanks to COVID-related supply chain disruptions, inflation has stabilized around 3% (instead of the Fed’s magic 2%). Those baby boomers are also part of the problem. As they age into retirement, capital availability is going to decline and the Fed’s going to have rethink their strategy.

I doubt we’ll see interest rates drop for the next few years, so if you’re planning on borrowing some money…you might want to get on that ASAP.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hey everybody, Peter Zeihan here coming to you from Colorado. And today we’re going to talk about the Federal Reserve and monetary policy, specifically on the 26th of April, the personal Consumption Expenditures Index, which is the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation, ticked up to 2.7% when everyone’s been hoping that’s going to tick down. the folks on Wall Street are starting to get very thoughtful because they had all bet in the fourth quarter of last year.

In the first quarter of this year, that by now we would have had a half a dozen rate cuts to stimulate the economy. And the Federal Reserve does not seem interested at all. And playing to their preferred narrative. So I thought it was worth going back to understand why we are where we are, and why you should not expect rate cuts probably at all.

If anything, rate increases for the remainder of the next 2 to 5 years. So step one, most of the inflation story that we’ve been experience of late has been Covid related. Every time that we saw a shift in consumption because of an opening or closing or new variant or new vaccine, whatever it was, we changed what we consume in terms of goods.

And every time we changed our consumption patterns, we had to, retool the supply chains to match the new demand. And it’s going to vary wildly by product and by region. But on average, you’re looking at an 18 to 24 month adjustment period before supply chains can catch up to what we want. Well, most of us reopened more than two years ago in California, the last American state to reopen for good, did so just under two years ago.

So for the last two years, we’ve been seeing inflation steadily tick down as supply chains catch up and the goods mismatch and the supply chain mismatch becomes a smaller and smaller feature in the system. unfortunately for the people who want lower rates, well, this has brought inflation down from 9%. We’re roughly ahead of the peak to something closer to three.

we’ve leveled off at three. And while we might have a little bit more to shake out as California fully comes back into the the system, I doubt we’re going to get down to the 2%, which is the ceiling that the Federal Reserve prefers. So we’re probably at what is our new normal, for inflation low. So not new, not our new average.

And unless we have a change in the Fed’s mandate, you shouldn’t expect interest rates to go down below where they are. If anything, you should expect them to go up. now, that requires understanding a couple other things that are in play. one of them is a little petty, and one of them is definitely not. First, the petty one.

The Federal Reserve looks at Wall Street and it says you have been dealing with capital inflows, of a huge volume, and you’ve been fairly irresponsible with them. you’re responsible for the.com crash. You’re responsible for the subprime crash. and we needed ten years to rebuild the financial sector after each of those catastrophes. So if there’s something that people in Wall Street in the financial community think, oh, well, this has to happen.

Well, it has to happen for their business plans. It doesn’t have to happen for the United States. Economy certainly doesn’t have to happen for the real economy. And it certainly doesn’t have to happen from the Fed’s point of view. So there’s probably a certain amount of wry revenge in play when the Federal Reserve looks at what Wall Street wants and then chooses to do something completely different for independent reasons.

The second issue is that there there really are independent reasons. And for that we have to look at demographics. So when you’re 45 to 65, that is when you’re the most capital rich that you will ever be in your life because your kids are moving out, your house is being paid down and you are saving your money for retirement

Also, if you’ve been at your job for decades, you’re pretty good at it. You’re income’s the highest it will ever be. So from 45 to 65 and especially 55 to 65. That is where all private capital comes from. The savings, all of that capital rich group. Well, the largest generation we’ve had in human history are the baby boomers, not just here in the United States, around the world.

The oldest baby boomers hit 45 in 1990, and the youngest baby boomers will hit 65 and retire and liquidate all their money or all their savings at the low velocity investments they’ll retire in 2030. So from Roth early 2000 to 2020, almost all of the baby boomers were in that capital rich portion of their lives. And as a result, capital availability on a on an American basis, on a global basis was the highest had ever been.

Capital costs were the lowest it was ever been. And in that environment, the fed will be the first to tell you that that made American finance really matter, because there is no way the United States could metabolize all of the baby boomer capital. So an entire financial class rose up to take advantage of the trough and to come up with new financial products, to metabolize it and send a great amount of it abroad.

At the same time, the Chinese were going through something similar from 2000 to 2. 2020 is roughly when their economy was firing on all cylinders. And while it’s not based on private savings to the same degree that ours is, they do a lot more monetization, which is a fancy way of saying printing currency, all the gold bugs in the crypto guys, to a certain degree are right that that’s not great, that it puts everything on a sugar high.

But the Chinese central bank is the one that’s guilty of that, not the US Federal Reserve. Anyway, for 20 years we had all this capital just spamming out of the United States and out of China. And Wall Street was necessary. The financial sector was necessary. A wave above bottomless wave of financial professionals was necessary to use all that capital.

And did they get it all right? No, none of us do. Anyway. That wave’s gone. The vast majority of baby boomers are now retired, and the rest of them will leak out of the system over the next five six years, which means their capital is gone. It’s been turned into low velocity investments like T-bills and cash. The next generation down Gen X is small and the next large generation, the millennials won’t be entering that capital rich period for another 10 to 12 years.

And that assumes they do everything on time. And to this point, whether it’s having a kid buying a house or getting married, the millennials have been doing everything about six years late anyway. Bottom line is there’s not nearly as much free capital available, which means we don’t need nearly as large of a financial sector. And so the Federal Reserve is looking at all this.

And they like there’s less capital demand is falling. Our tools are designed to regulate capital on demand. That means we need to find a new model. And in this new model, the financial sector is no longer all knowing, all seen and omnipresent. So the Federal Reserve rightly is concerned about inflation. And now that we’re in a period of deja globalization, we’re seeing demand for American employment.

And American capital in American materials skyrocket as the U.S. steadily and with increasing speed, disentangle itself from global supply chains. And that means building a lot more industrial plant. And it absorbs all of the things that the private sector has always absorbed. But now, to build a fundamentally new infrastructure that’s expensive, that’s a lot of demand, that’s a lot of inflation.

Now, I’d argue that it’s productive inflation because it’s building the industrial plant that we’ll need for the next generation or two. But until and unless the Federal Reserve mandates changes, they’re not going to be able to get to a world of 2% inflation. Certainly not if they lower interest rates. So when people say higher for a longer, they may be thinking about another quarter or two before interest rates drop.

But I say that until this industrial plant is built out and until we have another large capital generating class in their 50s, why higher for longer means another decade before we see any appreciable relief in capital costs. So bottom line, if you’re going to borrow, do it now. Because even today, with capital costs that have increased by a factor of four in the last five years, this is still the cheapest capital you’re going to be able to access until the mid 2030s.

US Birth Rates Plummet To 40-Year Low

The Webinar – The State of Global Energy – is TOMORROW!

Peter will deliver his analysis and forecasts for regional energy production and his assessment of geopolitical risk—everything from war, to instability and regulatory risk—with an eye on challenges and opportunities facing global production and supply.

Please join us on Friday, May 10th at 12:00 PM EST.

Well, it looks like there’s something in the water in the US and it ain’t little blue pills. The recent US Census data shows a 40-year low in the birth rate – about 1.6 per woman.

With the birth rate well below the replacement level, there could be huge economic implications that follow. There are plenty of other countries facing similar demographic issues, so the US has plenty of case studies to read up on.

This isn’t the kiss of death quite yet, but it won’t be easy path forward. Between meaningful immigration reform and policies supporting young families to have more children, the US has to make some big changes if they want to stop that demographic timebomb.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hey everybody. Peter Zeihan here. Coming to you from Colorado in between the snows. it is April 25th. And the news. You’re not gonna get this for, like, a week. I know, I’m sorry. the news today is that, the United States Census has come out with the most recent information on population structure for the United States, and it indicates that our birth rate has dropped to a 40 year low of about 1.6 per woman.

2.1 is generally considered to be replacement level. And if you add in increases in the death rate in the United States from things like Covid, which killed about a million, 4 million, 3,000,004 people, as well as the rapidly aging and therefore passing the baby boomers. And then on top of that, the opiate opioid epidemic. We really need to be closer to 2.3 or 2.4.

It’s just too cold. The population where it is. the only other way that you can plug that gap was with immigration. Let’s just say that that is a topic that is somewhat hot at the moment. what does this mean? Well, in the short term, from a demographic point of view, short term is 20 years. From a short term point of view, this is actually pause div for economic growth, because if you have a lot of people aged roughly 20 to 45, which is where the millennials are right now and they don’t have a lot of kids, then the money that they would spend on schooling and buying a bigger house, they can use

for more furnishings and more travel and more restaurants, and more high octane growth that feeds through the system and has a multiplier effect. this is something that we saw in China in the 2000. This is something we saw in Europe in the 1990s. and you can get some really high quality growth out of it. The problem is that you only do that once.

And if your birth rate never recovers, then after 20 years, you start eating into your working age population, and after 50 years, you start eating into your skilled worker population as well as your tax base. Then eventually you’ll get to a place like where the Germans and the Koreans are now, where this has now been going on for 60 years.

And so this is the last ten year period that we basically have a modern Korean or German economy, unless something radical shifts more traditionally, having a low birth rate just means that you’re going to have fewer people available to work in the future and fewer people to maintain the system in the future. Now, for the United States, we have a very atypical demographic history compared to really everyone else in the rest of the world.

compared to the rest of the industrialized world, most of the other industrialized countries are far more urbanized than we are. So they started this collapse below replacement levels not just 20 years ago, but 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, in some cases 80. And so it has a lot of steam built up for us. The decline really below, replacement is only about a 10 to 15 year process, and it’s been very slow even then.

In addition, because the United States was part of the second cadre of countries to industrialize, we have seen our birth rates go down. But because the United States is such a big place with so many small towns and such huge options for suburbs, it’s declined a lot more slowly than everywhere else. So if you look at the data and we’ll throw a chart up here, you’ll see that the United States has been kind of hugging around that two, 2.1, area for the last 40 years, whereas a lot of other countries that are kind of in are pure class, plunged below it long ago.

that doesn’t mean that we are doomed to follow them if Americans keep aging at their current rate. If the birth rate keeps dropping at its current rate, we’re not going to be facing a Korean or a German style problem within the next 40 years, and probably closer to 50. so while this isn’t a great sign, it’s not like we’re about to jump off a cliff.

the other group of countries, the developing countries, are very different. these are the countries that, for the most part, did not develop the technologies of industrialization. It was thrust upon them. So you took a century, a century, a half of technical development in the West and in Japan, and in the course of under 30 years implemented it throughout most of what we now think of as the developing world.

And so they went directly from the farms to condos and in, in doing so saw their birth rates just plunge horrendously. And you can see that on the chart. China, of course, is the country that industrialized the most quickly got the growth boom from that, from not having a young generation. and now is well past the point of no return and is very close to having one of the lowest birth rates in the world.

So is there anything we can do about this? Well, there’s two things. The first is you can have meaningful immigration reform in order to bring in more people, but to bring in the scale of people that were required to tilt this, it would be pretty extreme. the second thing you can do is encourage policies that make it easier for younger families to have more kids.

Part of the economic growth story of places like Texas the last 30 years is that the land is cheap, the electricity is cheap, the food is cheap, and taxes are low. So if you’re a young family starting out, it’s easier to have a house with a yard and raise children. If you’re going to do that in San Francisco, whoo hoo hoo!

Or New York. Yeah, that’s not going to happen. Raising kids in a condo is no fun at all. one other little thing that I just kind of throw in there so that people understand that everything has a consequence over the same time that US birth rates have dropped since 1990. We’ve also seen the teen pregnancy rate drop by roughly half, and there is a direct correlation between those two things.

So saying you need more kids makes a lot of sense how you get more kids. That’s what really matters.

Why Japan Needs a US Alliance

The Webinar – The State of Global Energy – is this Friday!

Peter will deliver his analysis and forecasts for regional energy production and his assessment of geopolitical risk—everything from war, to instability and regulatory risk—with an eye on challenges and opportunities facing global production and supply.

Please join us on Friday, May 10th at 12:00 PM EST.

The Japanese have looked into their crystal ball and figured out that a close relationship with the Americans is the only way forward. Before Japan is welcomed in with open arms, they’ll have to prove their worth…

Between trade issues, economic challenges, and demographic crisis, it makes sense that Japan wants to join the AUKUS group (a defense focused coalition made up of the US, the UK, and Australia).

Japan has some big changes to make. While their naval capabilities are solid, they have to make the cultural and political shift toward taking a more active role for themselves and their region. They also lack real world combat experience and have plenty of cybersecurity concerns to overcome. I wouldn’t expect to see the green light anytime soon, but eventual collaboration looks to be in the cards.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hey everybody. Peter zeihan here coming to you from Colorado. Today we’re going to talk about the recent batch of up to up meetings between the Japanese and the Americans. In mid-April, we had a very large number of contacts up to and including Japanese Prime Minister Kushida, as well as, US President Biden. at issue is the Japanese are angling for a much closer relationship.

So the back story Japan in the 80s up until the 80s was a huge trade country, but then they had a demographic bomb and a debt crisis at the same time. And over the next 30 years, their competitiveness basically tanked. And so they spent the next 30 years. I don’t want to say gutting, but changing the way their industrial processes worked with as much of the manufacturing as possible.

Closer to the end, consumers in countries that didn’t face a demographic bomb. And in doing so, they went from one of the most trade weighted heavy countries in the world to one of the least involved with today, only about 10 to 15% of GDP based on where you draw the line. comes from international trade in any meaningful way.

Toyota says, you know, we build where we sell, and that has basically become the national motto. Now, that requires a degree of openness in the country that you’re trying to sell it. And so when the Japanese over the last 20 years saw the United States becoming more and more isolationist when it came to its economic issues, they’re like, wow, we need to we need to get ahead of this.

So they reached out to none other than Donald Trump and cut a trade deal from the Japanese point of view, was borderline humiliating. But they knew that that was the price to pay for a long term strategic and economic relationship. And in the aftermath of Trump’s fall, the leadership of Japan has been to the United States to make it clear to Joe Biden that unlike a lot of the other countries that signed trade deals with the Trump administration, Japan wasn’t looking for any changes.

Something that the Biden administration greatly appreciated anyway. So with that in your back pocket, we can now talk about the relationship moving forward. specifically, the Japanese are angling for membership in a group called Aukus, which is Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States, countries that are now pooling parts of the defense budget. And a lot of the defense technology to build a new generation of weapons.

the Australian specifically will get out of this nuclear attack subs and medium range air launch cruise missiles, which are, you know, very blimey. And it will tighten what is basically already one of the the tightest security relationships among any three countries in the world. the Japanese would like to get into that. and if you look at what the primary concerns of the anchor steel is China, you can see how that would be a really, really nice fit.

but it’s not going to happen in the near term. Three problems. Number one, culture after World War two, when the Japanese were recovering from those twin atomic blasts. The Japanese made the very serious and probably very correct decision that we never want to be in a position again where we might even theoretically, be on the wrong side of the United States.

So we have to have a Navy. We’re an island country. We don’t have a good land network because it’s so mountainous. We have to have a navy just for, normal commerce, maritime for us anyway. And so we’re going to have a naval force. And even today, the Japanese are the second most powerful navy in the world.

But we have to make sure that that’s cast in a way that will never make the Americans ever blink, that we might be anything other than an ally that does as it’s told. that worked during the Cold War, that worked in the post-Cold War era. But it’s not going to work now, because if the Japanese are going to be part of an alliance with the Australians, the Brits and the Americans, then they need to take some initiative on themselves.

They need to patrol their own zones. They need to contribute to the greater whole. And that requires a lot more aggressiveness, and especially a culture of having a military that is not looked down on. Basically, in Japan until recently, if you went into the military because people thought that you couldn’t do anything else. that needs to change, because the Japanese do have one of the most technologically advanced systems in the world.

So, number one, culture cringe. number two. Experience. Part of being a pacifist. No matter what your equipment looks load looks like means that you don’t shoot. And so, since 1945, the Japanese functionally have had no combat experience. And this is going to sound really weird. The war on terror for a lot of countries was an opportunity to get experience interfacing with the United States and get limited combat experience on an issue that, for them was not really top tier.

So, you know, if something went disastrous, there might be some political fallout, especially with the Americans. But it’s not like Japan would face a threat to the home islands from Al-Qaeda. Well, now that the Americans have wrapped up the war on terror, that opportunity, if that’s the right word, is gone. And the Japanese, if they want to look around and get some practice, you know, you got the Russians and the Chinese, but if there’s a fight with them that is not small scale, that does not have a low risk.

so it’s not clear how. Aside from drilling, drilling, drilling, drilling with your own forces, with the Americans, with Australia, it’s not clear how they can get that experience before they get to a real fight. The third problem, luckily, is something that is a little bit more short term and a little easier to fix, and that’s cybersecurity. If you are a pacifist and if you believe that military activity is passé.

Well, you don’t really worry about your information control. And I would argue that aside from the Chinese, where a lot of cryptography is functionally illegal, so the government can hack its own population. The Japanese people are probably the most hacked people on the planet. That’s got to change if they’re going to be part of any sort of deep information and technical sharing, because nobody wants to develop a new nuclear submarine.

Share the plans with the Japanese and you see it on TikTok the next day. Luckily, there’s plenty of ways to get experience combating that, and I have no doubt that the Japanese are already working on multiple cylinders in order to get that experience built up. But still, that’s not something you do in three months or six months, or nine months or 12 months.

It’s also your process. So will this happen in some version? I think almost guaranteed. But the question is how fast can the Japanese make? The changes are going to be necessary so that the rest of their would be allies are willing to trust them? That’s not the case here.

America’s Nuclear Supply Chain

The Webinar – The State of Global Energy – is this Friday!

Peter will deliver his analysis and forecasts for regional energy production and his assessment of geopolitical risk—everything from war, to instability and regulatory risk—with an eye on challenges and opportunities facing global production and supply.

Please join us on Friday, May 10th at 12:00 PM EST.

We’re finally seeing signs of life in Congress with the recent progress made on the establishment of a domestic uranium supply chain. This move aims to cut dependence on the Russians – who dominate global uranium processing.

This will be easier said than done though. Much of the nuclear infrastructure in the US is outdated and will need to be modernized in order to ensure a steady fuel supply. We’ll likely have to call in some favors from others who are already in the process of developing their own domestic supply system, like Canada and Australia.

This new development coming out of Congress is a step in the right direction and begins to address two major concerns facing the US: energy and national security.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hey, everybody. Peter Zeihan coming to you from Colorado. the news at the moment is that late last week, we finally got the first functional laws through committee. and actually getting action on the congressional floors for building out a domestic uranium supply chain system. the idea is that if we can refine enough fuel to enrich enough fuel, being the technical term, we will be able to cut the Russians out of the mix.

It’s all together. the Russians are the world’s single largest producer of enriched uranium. and they are responsible for nearly half of the global market in about one quarter of ours. the process is you take raw uranium from somewhere with Kazakhstan being the single biggest player and the Australians being the biggest up and comers. You then spin it up so that the fissile component makes up somewhere between 3 and 5.5% of the mix.

You take that enriched uranium and build it into a fuel rod that eventually ends up in a nuclear power reactor. the issue that we have is peace. Ironically, at the end of the Cold War, the Americans and the Russians were left with literally tens of thousands of nuclear weapons. And we collectively decided that we were going to get rid of them.

So the question was, what do you do with all the enriched uranium that is in a bomb? Now, the enriched uranium that’s at a bomb is at 3 to 6% enriched. It’s like 90 to 95% enriched because you want it to go kaboom. And so we basically spend that stuff down instead of up and used it to make fuel rods going from the other direction.

Well, you do that for 25 years, which is what it took to get rid of all those weapons. And there really wasn’t much of an economic impetus for any company in the United States to do the more normal type of and other enrichment, up from uranium ore. So we basically stopped doing it altogether in the United States. It was only in places like Russia or China where was a national security issue.

to build the stuff up, where they kept producing it. And so now we have to rebuild an enrichment system, at the civilian level. And that’s what these new laws are about now. right now, nuclear power provides about 20% of the American electricity mix. I think we’ve got 95 reactors out right there right now. the issue is we there’s only so much flexibility in that system because with a couple of exceptions, all of this reactors are more than 40 years old.

Most of them are 50 years old. Actually, Three Mile Island was that 1973 or 1970 that I can’t remember anyway. They all predate Three Mile Island, except with two exceptions. so the idea that you can really update these things to more modern technology, and there’s not a lot of modern technology to do. So we have to go back to the old system to keep these online.

on the upside. everyone has seen this coming, and they’ve been stockpiling for some time, so we probably have about two years of fuel supply here in the United States for a reactor system. And that should be plenty of time to basically replicate technology that dates back to the 50s. in order to build a domestic supply system.

And we’ll also be getting some help from the Canadians and the Australians who are in the process of building out their own system for very similar reasons. So this Congress, while it has been difficult for it to do anything, has seemingly found an issue that is both energy related and national security related and seems to be actually progressing forward.

So, you know, one miracle at a time. But I take my good news where I can’t these days take care.

The State of Global Energy Webinar & The New Chinese Carriers

The Webinar – The State of Global Energy – is only 5 days away!

Peter will deliver his analysis and forecasts for regional energy production and his assessment of geopolitical risk—everything from war, to instability and regulatory risk—with an eye on challenges and opportunities facing global production and supply.

Please join us on Friday, May 10th at 12:00 PM EST.

The newest Chinese aircraft carrier, the Fujian, has officially hit the seas. This a major development for the Chinese Navy, but still falls short when compared to with advanced counterparts (i.e. the US).

The Fujian is intended to be a test bed, meaning the Chinese will throw all of their tech onto it and see what works. Which means we’re still a ways out from seeing an actual combat vessel hit the water.

Despite all the “advancements” we’re seeing on the Fujian, the Chinese still opted out of the nuclear power option. So with a limited range and no intention of ever seeing combat, the Fujian doesn’t drastically alter my forecast for China’s naval capabilities.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hey, everybody. Peter Zeihan here, coming to you from Colorado. for those of you been watching me for a while, you know that every once in a while I do a webinar on a topic of the moment, and we’re going to be doing that again this coming Friday, May 10th, at noon eastern, which, of course, if I get the timezones right would be 11 a.m. central, 10 a.m. mountain and 9 a.m. Pacific.

That’d be about 45 minutes of going through all the crazy that we’ve seen in the energy markets going back to the end of Covid, explaining why we are where we are now and what to expect over the next 12 to 24 months. I’ll be going for about 45 minutes, and then we’ll have ample time for Q&A at the end, so you can sign up via the link that is attached to this email or this Twitter feed.

And I hope to see everyone there. Morning, everybody. Peter, I’m here coming to you from Phenix, Arizona. taking an entry from the Ask Peter series today. specifically, the Chinese have just floated their third aircraft carrier, the Fujian. And does this change my general assessment that the Chinese navy is kind of a joke? maybe a little, let’s give you the backdrop.

Okay. So the United States has been engaged in carrier aviation for over a century at this point, and we have ten ships of the Nimitz class, which are the super carriers, which are typically considered the gold standard in terms of their operational capability, their nuclear powered, the carrier of dozens of fighters and fighter bombers each and their capacity, to operate around the world is unlimited and unparalleled.

in addition, these are now the old ships. The United States is in the process of floating a new type of carrier called the Ford class, which is bigger, has more speed, has more carrying capacity and can strike faster and maintain more sorties at the same time and get them out faster. In comparison, most of the world’s other carriers are very limited.

the Brits are in the process of trying to get two super carriers very, very loosely modeled after of the American. Nimitz is in operation right now. The Japanese have converted two things that we call helicopter destroyers into medium sized carriers. And then there’s a huge drop to everybody else. So, for example, the French do have the Charles de Gaulle, which is technically a super carrier, but it has a hard time generating enough power to get up to speed to launch fighters unless the weather is absolutely perfect.

And then there’s another huge drop to everybody else, like, say, the ties with the Indians. The Chinese are kind of in the middle, well below the Japanese, well below the Brits. they have three carriers now. The first one is actually an old Soviet carrier that was built in the 80s, but it was never completed. And then it rusted in a Ukrainian port for a decade, where the Ukrainians basically stripped it for metals, and then it got towed to China and sold and eventually rechristened as the.

sorry, I can’t remember the name. it was originally the patriotic, and no one in China, who is in the military, especially who’s in the Navy, will ever consider that that vessel’s anything other than a test of China’s ability to just comprehend what carrier aviation is. It is never, never, never, never intended to see combat in any form.

The second Chinese carrier is a clone of that first one. That’s the on, and it, again, isn’t all that great. it is just a clone of an old Soviet model. And it was the Chinese attempt to see if they could take 1970s technology that did not work very well and bring it into the modern age a little bit.

Most of the parts are the same, but they have put in some things like new avionics and sensors. And again, no one in the Chinese Navy would consider it a combat vessel. It’s a test vessel. The new one that we have, the Fujian, is their first domestically designed one. and that means that it’s certainly better and uses more current technology.

But again, the Chinese navy is not talking about this thing as a combat vessel. It is a test bed. Think of it like for those of you who like the Navy stuff, think of it like the enterprise, not the USS enterprise of the United Federation plan, as in Star Trek. No to know the American carrier enterprise, which was designed as a test bed for a whole host of new technologies.

This is China’s first attempt to build something that actually floats and theoretically down the road could see combat. But this isn’t the one that would do it. This would be in theory, if everything works out perfectly, which will take them years to figure out, this would be the model that other carriers would then be built on. So yes, the Chinese have three carriers.

Yes, they are taking steps forward in their operations constructions, but they’re coming from a century behind and they still very honest with themselves here, are not claiming that any of these are combat vehicles. one more thing to keep in mind. The Fujian, the new one is a nuclear powered. So you’ve got an 80,000 ton vehicle that still has to burn fuel, which means that its range is sharply limited, and it can’t go much further than most of the rest of the Chinese navy, which is largely limited to operating within a thousand miles of the Chinese coast.

So is this significant? Sure. And if they keep up their current pace, they will be able to have a carrier that can stand up to an American carrier that’s 50 years old in the next decade or two. Not something that changes my forecast all that much.

Warfare Innovations: Russia’s Turtle Tanks

The Webinar – The State of Global Energy – is only 1 week away!

Peter will deliver his analysis and forecasts for regional energy production and his assessment of geopolitical risk—everything from war, to instability and regulatory risk—with an eye on challenges and opportunities facing global production and supply.

Please join us on Friday, May 10th at 12:00 PM EST.

The Russians are playing dress up with their tanks and it might reveal where the future of military conflict is heading. Okay, “dress up” might not be the right term, but just google a picture of the Russian turtle tanks to get an idea of what I’m talking about.

These tanks are being equipped with heavy armor to defend against the drone attacks that have become popular in the Ukraine War. This innovation reflects a larger shift in warfare strategies, as countries like Ukraine have had to come up with new (and cheaper) ways of striking targets.

Innovations like the turtle tanks are a great example of the adaptations in modern warfare. However, as aid and support hit Ukraine, we’ll likely see a new round of innovations emerge onto the scene.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hey everybody. Peter Zeihan here. Coming to you from snowy Colorado. Today we’re going to talk about a military, innovation on the Russian side of the Ukraine war. You guys may have seen some of the videos and the photos, but they have something that’s now called a turtle tank, where they take a tank and they put it in this turtle like shell of armor that covers the entire thing.

to the point that the turret can’t even rotate. the idea is to make it relatively drone proof. it looks silly. And obviously some of the earlier iterations were destroyed quickly. but the Russians have continued to innovate it because they need it. It’s serving a very real battlefield purpose. So perhaps because of what happened with the U.S. Congress, it’s been months since the Ukrainians have gotten meaningful military assistance from the United States.

And in that sort of environment, they’ve been forced to go kind of a do it yourself program. and so instead of relying on more traditional things like tanks and missiles, long range drones and artillery, they basically can cranking out thousands, tens of thousands of anti-personnel drones that only weigh a couple pounds, every month. And while one of those is probably not going to take out a tank, you know, a couple that get to the right spot can maybe damage or tread and immobilize a vehicle and then allow other methods to go in and take it out.

Well, in that same sort of environment, if they don’t have a lot of artillery, then the Russians can mass forces and make big pushes into Ukrainian positions. The turtle tank is a way for the Russians of dealing with both of those issues. So if there isn’t a lot of artillery, then the tanks can be in clusters with infantry and get a lot closer to the Ukrainian positions more or less safely.

and then by putting all this shell of armor on it, the anti-personnel mines can’t damage the treads. No matter how many you throw at it, you’re still might be some gaps in the armor because, you know, you have to be able to see. But, it’s a much different situation where the Ukrainians would have to throw two or 3 or 400 things at one tank in order to stop it, as opposed to just a half a dozen before.

In addition, the Russians are putting protection on the bottom of the tank so they can serve as kind of slapdash, mind clearing devices as well. So the idea is you take a couple these turtle tanks and push directly into Ukrainian positions, going right through the mines that the Ukrainians have dropped, basically ignoring the anti-personnel drones that’s getting thrown at them.

And then behind those tanks, you have vehicles that are carrying infantry. So it’s designed to basically provide direct access to the Ukrainian positions. And all the while, the Russians are hitting these Ukrainian positions with artillery and glide bombs. So it’s not a stupid strategy at all. the question is whether it is sustainable, whether it’s going to be necessary in the future.

A couple things to keep in mind here. We are kind of in a position like we were in the U.S Civil War with a whole new raft of military technology is becoming available, and we’re seeing how they do and do not mesh with the technologies. Oh, we already had. So regardless of what you think of either side of the Ukraine war, studying how both sides are adapting to this new reality is something that is going to educate us all on the nature of military conflict moving forward.

So this is a big deal. And what the Russians are doing is they’re basically inventing a new style of warfare, whether or not this specific type of weapon system is going to last. probably not. The only reason that the turtle tank is viable is because Ukrainians don’t have artillery. And now that the US Congress has finally acted and weapons systems are being flown in at most, most, first and foremost, including a lot of artillery shells.

You should expect things like this to just be lit up as targets, very soon. So this specific weapon system might not be the harbinger of things to come, but it’s certainly representative of a whole class of weapons systems that are going to be invented from scratch or during the remainder of this war.

The TikTok Ban Is (Almost) Here…One Year Later

Please join us on Friday, May 10th at 12:00 PM EST for the Webinar – The State of Global Energy

A little over a year ago, we discussed a potential ban on TikTok in the US. Well, President Biden finally signed the “Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act”, which would ban TikTok or force its parent company, ByteDance, to sell it.

You can bet that TikTok won’t go down without a fight, so we’ll probably still be talking about this a year from now…but the video below is a little reminder about why I’m not torn about this ban.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Power Outages in Texas and Growing Energy Demands

The Webinar – The State of Global Energy – is only 10 days away!

Peter will deliver his analysis and forecasts for regional energy production and his assessment of geopolitical risk—everything from war, to instability and regulatory risk—with an eye on challenges and opportunities facing global production and supply.

Please join us on Friday, May 10th at 12:00 PM EST.

Over the weekend, some Texans had a not-so-friendly reminder that their power grid doesn’t work well under stress. This is just one of many outages and electricity challenges that Texas will face in the coming years.

There’s 3 main things contributing to the state’s energy grid issues: climate change, population growth, and industrial regeneration. Some of these are bit easier to track than others, but Texas must carefully navigate each of them to keep up with demand.

As energy demands grow, the Texas grid will have to expand significantly to keep up. That means we can expect plenty of regulatory and infrastructure changes coming down the pipe.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hey, everybody. Peter Zeihan here, coming to you from Colorado. we’re going to talk today about Texas because back on the 28th, on Sunday, the, electricity regulator of Texas called Ercot warned that there could be rolling brown and blackouts on the 29th of April. their concern was that temperatures were already expected to nudge up above 90 degrees in some parts of central and southern Texas.

Now, at the end of the day, it wasn’t too bad. We just had a few sparks and brownouts here and there. The issue here is twofold. First, the one I can’t do anything about, and that’s climate change as Texas is getting warmer, as the population is expanding and people are moving into warmer and warmer areas. you’re seeing more pressure on the system writ large.

electricity systems can transmit as much power when it’s hot. In addition, things like water cooling systems for, say, nuclear power plants don’t work as efficiently. So hot actually doesn’t just mean demand goes up. It means sometimes supply can go down. The other problem is more industrial, and it’s going to become a bigger and bigger and bigger problem moving forward at a much faster rate than anything the climate change does.

as the Chinese and the European systems crack. the United States is going to have to enter in a period of extreme industrial regeneration. Now, we’ve already started that. We’ve seen industrial construction spending in the United States expand by a factor of ten in just the last five years, and Texas has been an outsized beneficiary of that.

But the bottom line is this if you’re going to add a lot of industry and manufacturing, you’re going to be moving metal and forging materials and doing a lot of stamping. And all of those are really electricity intensive. It’s not that we don’t use more electricity as we get into things like server farms, but it’s nothing compared. What happens when you forge and move stuff.

So I estimate that the United States needs to roughly double the size of its industrial plant. And just from that, we need 50% more electricity. Well, in the case of Texas, you got a triple bind here. You’ve got the energy transition, which is more electricity dependent. You’ve got a population explosion as people move to Texas because it’s a cheaper place to live.

There’s no taxes. Land is cheap. food is cheap. Electricity until recently was cheap. And so you’ve got just a broad spectrum demand build and then the manufacturing renaissance on top of that. So I would estimate that the Texans need to actually double the size of their grid, preferably within the next 10 to 15 years, that we have never had that kind of build out before.

Now, there is a problem here in addition to just the sheer numbers involved, and that is the regulatory structure of Texas. It is separated from the rest of the national grid. It regulates itself, and connections between Texas and the rest of the country are very slim. So when Texas enters into a period of abject shortage, the only solution for it is to overhaul its regulatory structure, to bring in new power systems, or to link up to the rest of the grid, which means some federal regulation will come into play.

The Texans really don’t want to do option B. The problem with option A is if the Texans are have to change their ideology of power management. Right now, the way Ercot regulates the space is you can only charge the rate payers money four times when a power plant is actually operational. Well, that sounds kind of obvious. The problem here is when you deal with situations like, say, peak demand in the evening, you have to bring in a lot of peaker plants.

When you’re looking at solar systems. if you’re going to bring them on line, they only generate during the day. So what Texas has done partially for ideological reasons, is to penalize, companies that build systems that are not used all the time. Thing is, when you get into surge demand situations, that just means the grid goes down and that is an entire model that they are going to have to reimagine.

Now, people will, of course, point to California as a counterpoint, and I’m not saying that Californians have figured it out either. California’s decided to go whole hog into the green transition and pull out all the coal out of their system, and now as much natural gas as they possibly can. And they’re starting to make some crazy claims about having a largely carbon free grid.

And it is a lie. The Californians are really bad at math. basically every time the sun goes down, you know, every day they turn on this 11 gigawatt capacity cluster of lines that connects Los Angeles to, the Arizona border. And every a bed of electrons that are coming in from Arizona is fossil fuel driven, primarily natural gas and coal.

overall, California imports over one third of its electricity. They just don’t include that data in the math. So it’s not that California has really gotten green. It’s a California has simply outsourced its carbon emissions. Both California and Texas, I would argue, are now operating on a model that is failing, and both of them need to get overhauled.

Texas, however, is the one where this is going to be a desperate issue because no one is really thinking, oh, I’m going to build a manufacturing plant just outside San Jose. No no no no no no no. All that sort of stuff happens in Texas. So the demand to build is going to be explosive. And it’s going to force the Texans to make some uncomfortable decisions and some very large investments very soon.

WEBINAR – The State of Global Energy – May 10

A land war in Europe. The specter of spill-over conflict in the Middle East. Sluggish Chinese demand. Historic challenges to maritime security.

The global economy is five years on from the “normal” of 2019, but geopolitical risk abounds. What does that mean for global oil?

Peter will deliver his analysis and forecasts for regional energy production and his assessment of geopolitical risk—everything from war, to instability and regulatory risk—with an eye on challenges and opportunities facing global production and supply.

Peter’s presentation will be followed by a live Q&A session for all attendees. All registrants will receive access to the recorded webinar as well as a copy of presentation materials.

Please note: registration confirmation and access codes will be emailed to registrants by Zoom. Please make sure to check your spam folders, and that the email you used to register is correct.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Japan’s Navy Gets Teeth

The Japanese Navy is getting a face lift with the conversion of the Izumo-class destroyers into small supercarriers capable of holding F-35s (compliments of the US).

This marks Japan’s return to full-scale naval aviation and is a reflection of the overall strategic shift in Japan’s military posture. With regional affairs growing more dicey by the day (ahem, China), Japan is straightening out its military posture and looking to play a more assertive role.

Here at Zeihan On Geopolitics we select a single charity to sponsor. We have two criteria:

First, we look across the world and use our skill sets to identify where the needs are most acute. Second, we look for an institution with preexisting networks for both materials gathering and aid distribution. That way we know every cent of our donation is not simply going directly to where help is needed most, but our donations serve as a force multiplier for a system already in existence. Then we give what we can.

Today, our chosen charity is a group called Medshare, which provides emergency medical services to communities in need, with a very heavy emphasis on locations facing acute crises. Medshare operates right in the thick of it. Until future notice, every cent we earn from every book we sell in every format through every retailer is going to Medshare’s Ukraine fund.

And then there’s you.

Our newsletters and videologues are not only free, they will always be free. We also will never share your contact information with anyone. All we ask is that if you find one of our releases in any way useful, that you make a donation to Medshare. Over one third of Ukraine’s pre-war population has either been forced from their homes, kidnapped and shipped to Russia, or is trying to survive in occupied lands. This is our way to help who we can. Please, join us.

Hey everybody. Peter Zeihan here coming to you from Florida. The news today, we’re in the second week of April, is that the Japanese have released from initial refit a beard, what they call a heavy destroyer. The cargo. It’s part of the Izumi class. this was designed to be a helicopter carrier, right? It’s really a small supercarrier, if you will.

And they’ve now completed the refit so it can take American F-35, of which the Japanese are purchasing about 150, at least a third of which are supposed to be the carrier versions. and there’s definitely going to be more coming. this gives the Japanese full scale naval aviation for the first time since 1945. Keep in mind that the world’s first super carriers or carriers of any type actually are Japanese.

And so this is a skill set that they’re in the process of rebuilding. they’re also doing so hand in glove with the naval superpower, which is the United States. And obviously they’re going to be using a lot of American hardware and training to make this up to speed. So basically this takes Japan and transforms its already blue water navy into a blue water strike, maybe with significant over-the-horizon capabilities.

the Japanese who were doing this happened to over the Americas from a strategic point of view. And the vessels were already sailing together with the American fleets. the cargo will be going for sea trials now for probably about a year, maybe a year and a half before beginning full deployment. And while that is happening, the other of the two sumo class carriers, Mizuho, will now be going for its refit.

critics would say, and I would agree with them, that this was always the plan for the Izumo class. They were only called helicopter destroyers, for purposes of dealing with a population and a region that wasn’t quite comfortable with Japan taking a direct military role in affairs, but that has now turned, the Koreans have gotten quiet.

Everyone else in Asia realizes the Japanese being more fourth, which is actually a good thing. But most importantly, the Japanese population has moved beyond its general feeling to pacifism and the post-World War Two era, realizing that as the Chinese become more uppity that a firmer military position is needed and that requires hardware to accentuate the policy, it.

The End of the World is Just The Beginning

Disunited NAtions

The Absent Superpower

The accidental superpower

The End of the World is Just The Beginning

Disunited Nations

The Absent Superpower

The Absent Superpower

The End of the World is Just The Beginning

Disunited NAtions

The Absent Superpower

The accidental superpower

The End of the World is Just The Beginning

Disunited Nations

The Absent Superpower

The Absent Superpower

The End of the World is Just The Beginning

Disunited NAtions

The Absent Superpower

The accidental superpower

The End of the World is Just The Beginning

Disunited Nations

The Absent Superpower

The Absent Superpower

The End of the World is Just The Beginning

Disunited NAtions

The Absent Superpower

The accidental superpower

The End of the World is Just The Beginning

Disunited Nations

The Absent Superpower

The Absent Superpower

TranscripT

TranscripT

TranscripT

TranscripT

TranscripT

TranscripT

TranscripT

Please join Peter Zeihan and the Zeihan on Geopolitics team on Friday, May 10th at 12:00 PM EST for our upcoming webinar - The State of Global Energy.

TranscripT

Join 200,000+ other subscribers

Stay Social

GEOPOLITICAL INSIGHT STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX