The Future of Drone Tech: Long-Range Strikes

Drone firing a missile

Ukraine has ramped up its long-range drone program, allowing it to strike targets up to 1,800 kilometers away. So, what does this mean for Russia and its oil?

With Ukraine able to strike targets well into Western Russia, energy infrastructure is increasingly vulnerable. Thanks to the recent surge of foreign financial support rushing into Ukraine, drone production has ramped up. Russia might be able to shut down and restart the southern oil fields, but any fields shut down in the permafrost would take years or even decades to repair and restart.

So, expect Russian transport and export capacity to continue to drop, especially if these longer-range strikes continue throughout the summer months.

Transcript

Hey, all. Peter here still in Rome, approaching all the forums, continuing our open ended series about the changes of military technology. Now we’re going to deal with longer range drone system things with an excess of 300km. The Ukrainians have launched a series of systems over the course of the last roughly ten weeks that have increased their range upwards of 1800 kilometers total. 

So for those of you in metric, that’s roughly 900 to 1000 miles. And Moscow was only about 300, 350 miles from the front line. This means that Ukrainians can relatively reliably strike anything that is west of the Urals at this point, and even a few things opposite the URLs, if they really push it. These things are carrying warheads that are typically in excess of 100 pounds. 

They’re using them to heavily target not so much military assets directly, but infrastructure related to energy production and transport, pumping stations, refineries, ports, that sort of thing. Now, pre-war, the Russians exported about, oh, 2.5 million barrels per day of oil and about another million and a half barrels per day of refined product that is now facing some sphere problems. 

It’s really hard to give you accurate numbers because everything is changing day by day, and the Russians aren’t just sitting there. They’re repairing things as they go. So let’s talk about the technology and then talk about the impact. So first the technology, unlike the modified short to medium range drones where it’s just a matter, you know, just a matter of putting a couple new pieces of semiconductor to give it a limited decision making capability. 

This is a range issue. And so with the range issue, Ukrainians are limited by their industrial base, which they’re rapidly building out. We’ve had the number of drones per day in use, roughly Quinn Tipple over the course of the last ten weeks, and there’s no reason to expect that to slow. If anything, it’s probably going to accelerate. One of the things to keep in mind is because of the Iraq war and America’s inability to provide adequate air defense and missile defense to the Arab states, as we now have a cavalcade of countries in the Middle East and Europe that are providing funding for the Ukrainians to expand their industrial plant all over the place, and that’s giving them cash that is necessary to expand industrial plant and build out at home. Keep in mind that there are so many startups in Ukraine that are providing drone technology now that the Ukrainians actually ran out of money to fund them all. That’s not a problem anymore. So everybody is in the process of spinning up, and by the time we get to mid-summer, we’re probably going to be seeing daily strikes in dozens, if not hundreds of these things across the length and breadth of Russia regularly, every single day, most likely in terms of impact. 

It’s hard to get firm numbers on this because everything is a moving target. But oh yeah, fun little fact. The Romans had so much marble they used it for like, dust boards. Anyway, what this means is that we’ve had over 80 discrete energy targets across Russia come under sustained attack, sometimes getting hit three and four times a week. 

Major ports have gone offline and back. Online tanks are gone, pumping stations getting damaged. Even direct pipe strikes probably. There’s really no average here. But I would say on average, we’re looking at an overall reduction of somewhere between 1.5 and 2.5 million barrels per day of a combined transport and pumping and port capacity, and that gets well into the danger zone for the Russian system. 

The Russian oil complex kind of has two big phases down in the southern provinces. You can have some older fields that are basically supplied by water injection, and those you can run on reduced capacity or even shut them down safely and bring them back later. But collectively, that’s only about one to maybe 1.2 million barrels per day. Everything else is in permafrost territory, and because of heating and cooling problems, you can’t maintain a steady temperature at the production site at the bottom of the wellbore. 

In the pipelines and the pumping stations, everything cracks apart. Or in the case of some things, wax congealed in it. And then you have to replace the infrastructure completely. We’re now on the point where that has to be shut down, at least in part, and that stuff cannot be restarted on anything less than a multi year time frame. 

The last time this stuff all got shut down, it was in the aftermath of the Soviet collapse, and it took the Russians 20 years to bring it back up to snuff like they had it during the Soviet period. So we are now already today at the beginning of the end of Russia, as a country that can even export petroleum or petroleum products at all to its west. 

And if you keep up this crescendo of attacks throughout the summer, by the end of the year, the Russians really won’t be an oil power in the western provinces at all. And that includes most of the western and northwestern Siberian fields as well. That’ll just leave what is out on the east side of the Urals, which is a separate infrastructure. 

But at the rate the Ukrainians are going as entirely possible, that that may be in range by the end of summer anyway. So from a war point of view, this is how Russia pays for everything. All is the single largest inflow point for the Russian state budget, which funds. Of course, the military natural gas is kind of like the kicker on the side, but most of the natural gas, a lot of the natural gas has already been shut in because it can’t be redirected in the way that liquid oil can be. 

So the Ukrainians haven’t felt the need to go after it. They’ll probably find some reasons in the next few months, as energy targets become harder to find, because there just won’t be all that many left. And that’s Palatine Hill behind me. That’s one of the original seven cities of Roman, where most of the rich folk lived during the High Imperial period. 

One more detail. We already have reports from several Russian oil officials talking about shut ins in places like Tatar, Saturn and Bashkir stand, which is where the water recovery basically pumped down. Water increased well pressure, and the oil comes up and you skim the oil off the top, where that’s already been shut down by a significant margin, at least in the high hundreds of thousands of barrels. 

But we’re also getting that’s the stuff you can turn back on. We’re also getting some reports of things further north, where we were getting some panicked reports about wells that will never come back on at all. So we’re already well into this, and the Ukrainians aren’t letting up, if anything. Intensification over the summer.

The Future of Drone Tech: Israel’s Iron Dome

Photo of Iron Dome missile defense system firing

Fiber-optic-controlled first-person drones are the star of the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah. As Hezbollah deploys more of these drones, holes in Israel’s Iron Dome defense network are beginning to appear.

Iron Dome was designed to intercept rockets and missiles traveling in visible ballistic arcs. These drones use completely different attack approaches; they fly low and are connected via fiber-optic cables, so jamming won’t work either. You couple that with widely available components, and it becomes clear that Israel can’t defend against these drones on its own.

The other major player in drone-tech and defense is Ukraine, so I wouldn’t be surprised if we saw closer cooperation between these two countries soon. We’ll continue this discussion on the future of drone tech tomorrow.

Transcript

Peter Zeihan here, coming to you from Saint Peter’s. Feels weird to do a video in here. So we’re just going to do the opener. I’m obviously in Vatican City, and today we’re going to talk about some new things in the world of military technology. All right. Continuing. Oh yeah Swiss Guard back there. Anyway, the news is over the course of the last month, we’ve seen some significant shifts in terms of the technologies used in the Lebanon War. 

Now, for those of you who have forgotten, Israel launched an invasion of Lebanon at the same time that the Iraq war started with the airstrikes by Israel and the United States against Iran. And it’s been continuing, it’s turned into a long term occupation, with the Israelis indicating they really never planned to leave at all anyway. What’s changed in the last few weeks is that we’ve started to see first person drone. 

This place is pretty cool. We’ve seen first person drone attacks. Now those are the ones where you have a pilot with a unit who’s controlling a specific drone, and they’ve got a live telemetry feed that allows them to make decisions in real time. The drone itself has no intelligence or strike capability independent of the pilot. What’s unique about what we’ve seen recently is that we’ve seen now at least a dozen situations where Hezbollah has used these first person drones, but has used them with fiber optic cables, with at least one of them confirmed it would be at least ten kilometers long. 

So with some hints indicating there’s been a couple with fiber optic cables that are about 20km long. Now, a few things to keep in mind about this. Number one, Israel arguably has the absolute best theater missile defense in the world with its Iron Dome system. And lots of folks think that the United States should at least partially copy it. 

And there’s something to be said for that. But keep in mind that Israel is a very small place. So the missile defense you’re going to do in a place like Israel is very different for what you do in the United States. Second, the nature of Iron Dome is primarily designed to intercept short term rockets and maybe some short to mid-term missiles. 

Every time Israel comes under attack, you get some really dramatic visuals, different kind from here, where you can see ballistic arcs that are pretty clean on one side of the photo, and on the other side, you’ll have a swirl of intersecting and spiraling threads, and then they meet. The swirling and intersecting ones are the Iron Dome system. Basically, they fire interceptors into the air. 

They don’t know how many things are going to come in, and then the interceptors lock on to those ballistic arcs and take them out. That really doesn’t work for low level drones at all, because you’ve got a fiber optic around this just flying a few feet to, or maybe a few hundred feet off the ground. They don’t get high enough to be registered by radar, even if they had the components to be detected by a radar. 

A lot of these things are plastic or carbon fiber. That’s real problem, because it means that the entire Iron Dome system has been designed now for a weapon system that is starting to be used against Israel, and there’s very little of the technology that goes into these things that is restricted at all when it comes to suppliers. You really have to. 

You then have the Russians who have contacts with militant groups throughout the Middle East. Hezbollah is no exception. And when you come to the fiber optic spooling, most of that is made in China. So we’re having this really fun intersection of technical overlap, skill overlap, and increasingly geopolitical overlap among countries and forces that have been general been anti a lot of things American for a very, very, very long time. 

There’s not a lot that Israel can do in the short term to counter the sort of activity. Their radars and their interceptors right now are woefully ill designed to deal with this sort of threat. And because of the fiber optics, jamming doesn’t work either. So really, all you can do is kinetic intervention. And at the moment, the Israelis don’t have enough skills in that set to make a meaningful difference. 

The one exception, the one thing that might be coming, is partnership with Ukrainians, who have been developing a lot of models to intercept exactly this sort of drone and have had a fair amount of success. But that also means stationing things at dozens, hundreds of points in order to get it wherever it happens to be launched from. So it’s changing the nature of what it means for Israel to be in a war. 

And it’s dramatically shifting the power balance between the Israeli military, which is one of the best in the world, and Hezbollah, which we thought had largely been shattered as of just a year ago. One more thing. A high end fiber optic spool that a drone can carry today has a range of up to 50km. So with something half that just a mid-range quality, somebody launching a drone from the Hezbollah Lebanese side of the Israeli Lebanon border could strike anywhere in Haifa and with a significant margin. 

So you can go after anything you can see can’t be jammed with a that’s physical infrastructure, vehicles, soldiers or the components that allow the Iron Dome to do Iron Dome things. So big game changer. All right. That’s it by.

Should Alberta Secede from Canada?

Cityscape of Alberta, Canada

Apologies for the wind on this video, one of the downfalls of recording with a view…

Enough signatures have been gathered to force an independence referendum and vote in Alberta. Just a reminder that secession is legally possible in Canada following a successful referendum.

The economic case for independence centers on Alberta’s youth and energy sector. With stronger demographics and a booming oil industry, some Albertans feel they disproportionately contribute without the respective influence in government decisions.

While some of this is true, an independent Alberta would still face major economic problems. We’re talking rapid inflation and labor shortages, necessitating a trade agreement with Canada or integration with the U.S. Bottom line is that the grass ain’t always greener on the other side.

Transcript

Hey everybody. Peter Zeihan here coming to you from Rocca Calascio which was in Ladyhawke. If you haven’t seen it, add it to your list. The news today is that we are going to have a referendum on independence in Alberta. They, the people who are in favor of independence, got the 10% of the provincial citizenry to sign the petition. 

So later this year, probably at the end of the summer, we’re going to have the vote. The premier that’s kind of the governor of Alberta has already signed off on it, and away we are for the races. I’m not going to predict how it’s going to go. It is up to the people of Alberta and no one else. 

But I want to outline three things. Number one, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled decades ago in the case that if there is a plebiscite and they vote for a referendum, you’ve got to let them go. So this this is legal by Canadian law. Technically, something like this would not be legal in the case of the United States. The Constitution forbids secession. We fought a little war over it. But Canada is different. So that’s piece 1. Piece 2. The economic argument for independence is basically the idea that Canada is aging very, very rapidly and Alberta is not. And Alberta has a dynamic energy sector that has been growing for some time. And as the rest of Canada gets older and Alberta does not. The financial transfers from Alberta to Canada have been getting bigger and bigger and bigger, and the Canadians don’t really give the Albertans much say in how that money is spent, so you can see why they’re a little agro’d. I want to point out a couple of things that have changed in the relationship, though. Over the last 20 years, Canada has really brought in a surge of migrants that have partially addressed some of the demographic issues. So the financial transfer issue is not as horrible in relative terms as it used to be. In fact, at this moment, in relevant terms, Alberta is actually in decent position financially versus the rest of Canada. It’s still by far in net providers the richest province by far. But the imbalance is not as bad as it looked like it was going to be when I first started talking about this issue 15 years ago. 

And then finally, should this pass and Alberta become independent, it would be screwed. Alberta is landlocked and their primary exports are oil and grain, and those are US dollar denominated commodities. And so if you have an independent Alberta exporting for hard currency, you have a very inflationary environment very, very, very quickly. That it would be difficult to survive in a country that now has a very, very limited labor pool. So the cost of an independent Alberta would be immense, which means that independent Alberta would need to do one of two things. Number one, negotiate some sort of extensive free trade pact with Canada that would be worse for Alberta than provincehood is right now. It’s kind of like the situation that Brits are dealing with as they talk about going back on Brexit and reentering the EU. 

Or number two, apply for US statehood and join the United States, in which case Alberta is still the richest province, would still be a net donator to the national budget, but it wouldn’t be nearly the same. The stretch, the delta between an Alberta state in the United States would not be nearly as large. Anyway, these are the decisions in front of them. How they play out? That’s entirely up to them. The campaign this summer is going to be wild.

Magyar Tries to Rebuild the Visegrád Group

Budapest, Margit híd, Margaret Bridge, Jászai Mari tér, Hungary

Hungary’s new Prime Minister, Peter Magyar, made his first foreign trip to Poland. This trip is not a reflection of ideological unity, but rather a rebuilding of regional cooperation within the Visegrád Group.

This group had fractured over the past decade thanks to Viktor Orbán, but with him out of the picture and a common enemy in Russia, Hungary and the rest of the Visegrád Group can begin rebuilding.

If the Visegrád Group can reestablish itself, this bloc of countries can wield significant voting power within the EU, rivaling major states like France or Italy and bringing a stronger voice to Central Europe as a whole.

Transcript

Hey everybody. Peter Zeihan here, coming to you from Italy. It’s a monastery that was built around a hermit hole, probably in the eighth century. Then it was remodeled in the 11th, and then in the 14th. You get the idea. Reused. Lots of things in Italy are like that. Anyway, that reminds me of what’s going on right now in Poland. The Hungarian prime Minister, Peter Magyar. 

Peter, good name, made his first foreign trip to Warsaw to meet with the Prime Minister of Poland, Donald Tusk. Now let’s talk about what this isn’t and then talk about what it is. So what it isn’t is a political alliance that has to do with how the elections went. No no no no no no. Peter Magyar is center right, strongly right. 

I might underline. And the person he kicked out of power, Viktor Orban, supposedly was also sent to. Right, but was really just breathlessly corrupt and would bow down to anyone who wasn’t Brussels. And now that he’s gone, a number of his former ministers have actually fled the country because they know they’re going to be put into jail. And we’re kind of a series of parliamentary votes in Hungary that basically strips the ones that are left of any power. 

So it’s a real transition. But from corruption to conservativism, not from conservatism to liberalism. On the Polish side of the equation, Donald Tusk is an avowed pan-European list. He used to be an uppity up in European power structures before he went back home and became prime minister. He’s of the center left, and so the two of them on domestic political issues have a lot of things they argue about. 

But that’s not the point, because what this is, is more of a strategic alliance. You see, Poland and Hungary, along with the Czech Republic and Slovakia, form a group called the Visegrad Group, which is for countries that tend to coordinate their operations at the EU level. But for most of the last decade they haven’t, in part because Viktor Orban became more and more and more correct and more and more and more pro-Russian and less and less and less pro-European. 

And also because there were political evolutions in Poland where the nationalists were in power before Donald Tusk for quite some time, and they just found it difficult to get along. That’s probably behind us now. I don’t want to say it’s perfect, because we have a guy by the name of Robert Fico in Slovakia who’s a little a little odd, but not nearly as odd as some of the others have been in the last ten years. 

Why does this matter? The European Union doesn’t necessarily work on consensus. They have a weighted majority voting system among their Council of Ministers. That’s the Council of Prime ministers. That is nauseating, complicated. But the short version is to get anything past a certain number of countries have to agree, and those countries have to represent a certain percentage of the population. 

And if you take Poland and Slovakia and Hungary and Czech Republic and you bunch them together into a single voting bloc, they have actually more voting power because they’re four countries than France or Italy, two of the three big states in the EU. And they have about the same population. So this doesn’t mean that the Central Europeans are going to suddenly start getting their way on everything. 

But it does mean now that they can really duke it out with the major established advanced powers on an equal basis from a decision making point of view, plenty of things to worry about. The primary one for everyone right now is, of course, Russia and the Ukraine war. And with Orban gone, there’s a lot more room for consensus. 

And when you get past that and start talking about the nitty gritty things of day to day government like, say, budgets, now we’ve got the central Europeans who can actually stand up for themselves and get some things done. So all in all, reasonable first trip. Looks like it’s been a smashing success. Nobody stabbed anybody. And in Europe these days. That’s great.

Ebola Outbreak and Delayed Detection by the U.S.

Doctors in biohazard suits

At least 50 are dead due to a new Ebola outbreak in Central Africa, and the U.S. was the last to hear about it. This is a glaring example of the breakdown in the U.S. public health and monitoring system.

Three programs have traditionally acted as layers of defense: the Agency for International Development, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority. All three have been gutted under the Trump administration, so early detection, disease tracking, and vaccine development have all been sidelined.

Transcript

Hey all, Peter Zeihan here, coming to you from Roccascalegna, totally butchered the pronunciation of that one. Anyway, it’s Castle and there’s a more castle and mountains. Anywho, today I want to talk about something that hasn’t really made the news in the United States, but probably should. There’s a new Ebola outbreak in Central Africa. At least 50 people dead at this point. 

The numbers keep rising by the day, and the topic is why we really haven’t heard of it. There’s kind of a three line system of defense when it comes to new infectious diseases in the United States. The first of all things is USAID, the agency for International Development. That was basically it does development work in countries to help them get on their feet, deal with disaster relief, that sort of thing. 

Recovery in conflict zones. All that good stuff. Normally, this means that we’ve got thousands of American citizens working for the government all around the world, and they notice things. And so while, yes, economic development by far is their credo and their job, they actually serve as kind of a first line of defense for the intelligence community because they see things in the communities that they’re in. 

Well, USAID was dismantled and closed by the Trump administration last year, so we didn’t get any advance warning of this outbreak. Second, you’ve got the center for Disease Control, which does all the genetic testing and mapping of diseases and the epidemiology and all that fun stuff. Well, it’s been gutted and under new leadership, including RFK Jr, who’s in charge of the overall health approach in the United States. 

It’s basically not present in most parts of the world. So normally when an outbreak like this happens, the CDC is the first or the second call that is made to try to figure out what the disease is, how it’s communicated, how lethal it is, all that good stuff that has basically stopped. And it wasn’t until last week that the CDC got the call. 

And that’s well after three weeks after it was discovered locally. The third thing is something called Barda, which is kind of like DARPA, the defense operation that explores new technologies. Bart does the same thing, but it maintains a pipeline for new vaccines. Well, Bart has basically been gutted and funding as well, because RFK has basically decided that vaccines are bad. 

So we’re finding out about this late. Definitely on the back foot. And only now is the sequencing process starting. For those of you who don’t know what a bola is, it’s pretty nasty. It’s a hemorrhagic fever, which is a technical term of saying that you bleed from everywhere eyes, nose, ears, but fingernails, everything. And basically your body falls apart from the inside out. 

It’s a particularly nasty way to go. And at the moment, we’re barely looking for it. So political decisions have consequences. And one of these means that Ebola may be coming to a town here, you. Which is nasty, but the only bright spot I have is from the information that has been reported through the W.H.O., World Health Organization, which the US is no longer cooperating with. 

So this is something they told us out of the goodness of their heart rather than out of any sort of contractual obligation. It does appear at the moment that this new strain, I believe, is how it’s pronounced. Probably butchered. That too is no different from normal Ebola, and that it is spread by bodily fluid contact rather than by respiration. 

Just keep in mind that diseases change all the time. As we learned with Covid, and we’re now in a situation basically where if it does change, we won’t know until it’s here. So food for thought.

Can Iran Control Internet Cables in the Gulf?

AI generated undersea internet cables

We’ve previously discussed the vulnerabilities of global internet infrastructure, but today we’ll focus on subsea data cables in the Persian Gulf.

Global data traffic depends on undersea cables that carry massive amounts of information between continents. Iran has now decided it wants the ability to control and charge for data traffic moving through the region (mirroring its stance on shipping through the Strait). Many Gulf countries built separate subsea infrastructure, so all of them are exposed to disruption.

These vulnerabilities will likely push more communications toward satellite systems like Starlink, but that opens a whole new set of challenges. Another reminder of the fragility of globalization.

Transcript

Hey all, Peter Zeihan here, coming to you from the winery of Tenuta Oderisio in, where am I? Abruzzo in Italy. Today we’re going to talk about a little thing in the Persian Gulf called data cables. Now, for those of you who have ever sent an email, there’s got to be a way for you to access the internet, for the information packets to get from X to Y to Z, and eventually to where you need them to go. 

Now, there’s a number of ways you can do this. You can piggyback on the telephonic network. That’s a relatively new method using, say, 5G or 4G signals. Older school. For those of you who are Gen X or boomers, you remember, of course, modems where it went over the telephone lines that were physical at the time rather than wired. 

But if you want to go across the planet, there’s this little problem called the ocean, and there is no cell signal that is strong enough to get across. So you have to do one of two things. Number one, you bounce up to a satellite with something called Starlink, which is really the only model that does it right now, which has a cost and a hardware issue. 

Or you send it into the telephone network, and eventually it gets to a launching point on the coast and loads into a data cable that crosses the ocean to a spot on the other side. I think it’s loaded into their telephonic network, these data cables, there’s literally thousands of them, and the big trunk ones just carry a huge amount of data. 

Typically, one of them that crosses the ocean carries more data or has more capacity carry data than all of the telephonic systems just 25 years ago. Now, what is going on in the Persian Gulf is that the Iranians, who are trying to assert control and sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz in order to get control of the oil trade, are not limiting their ambitions to that. 

They’re going after container ships, they’re going after Bulgars, they’re going after food carriers, and they’re going after the internet cables. And they’re now saying that they think they should be able to charge a transit feed for any data flowing in and out of the Persian Gulf. Now you look at a map of the Persian Gulf, and you’ve got a lot of Arab countries on the western side Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, gutter, the United Arab Emirates and Oman. 

But something that everybody forgets is all of these countries really don’t like one another, and some of them would just flat out hate one another. So they, whenever possible, try not to make their national infrastructure dependent upon what happens in the next country. Over. So the United Arab Emirates, for example, doesn’t have a data cable that crosses Saudi Arabia and goes up to Jordan and into Israel and then on to Europe. 

And no, no, no, their only access is out into the Persian Gulf through the Strait of Hormuz on a subsea cable. The same for Kuwait, the same for gutter, the same for Bahrain. Which means that if you take a country like the UAE, which is actually reasonably well run and not nearly as medieval and thudded like, say, Saudi Arabia, they’re completely vulnerable to this sort of blackmail. 

And if you play this forward into a world, you have to realize that data cables can’t be defended and they can’t dodge. So anyone who decides they want to go after them can really sever them in a day if they want to. So the transmission system that we have become used to, that we don’t think of as a globalized thing, is actually one of the most hyper globalized aspects of physical infrastructure that exists on the planet today. 

And in the Strait of Hormuz right now, we are getting a glimpse of what to come when data connections that are allowed upon physical connections simply aren’t going to be viable long term. And that only leaves satellites. And that starts a different conversation about sovereignty and space and the ability to defend that sort of network. Because Starlink is already in the thousands of satellites, that already makes it more populous and orbit in terms of number of satellites than everything else put together, that is also not sustainable, but we’ll deal with that on a different day.

Civita di Bagnoregio: A Microcosm of Italy

Photo of the city of Civita di Bagnoregio, Italy with mountains in the background

Civita is living proof that places facing decline can adapt and overcome by drawing on their unique identity. This hilltop town-turned-tourist destination is a microcosm of Italy itself.

Faced with demographic challenges, Civita was forced to get creative to save its way of life. By charging a visitor tax, Civita was able to fund restoration projects and preserve this beautiful place.

Italy’s demographic crisis is only worsening, but success stories like Civita are a glimmer of hope.

Maurizio says ciao!

Transcript

Hey everybody, Peter Zeihan here, coming to you from Civita, Italy. And today we’re going to talk about Vita. And Italy is kind of Italy in microcosm. It was founded by the Etruscans, 2500 years as a hilltop town for defense. And because they could watch trade routes in the time since, it’s of course, changed hands, it does bene times as Italy has changed systems, and in the modern day it’s kind of actually facing a rough patch. 

As you’ll see in some of these pictures, it’s perched on the side of cliffs that are slowly eroding, and the country’s moniker these days is come see it before it’s gone. 

So many people have now visited that them simply tracking dirt out of the city has dropped the level of the main square by about a foot in the last six years. 

In addition, demographically, the city looks a lot like Italy. Italy has the lowest reproduction rate in Europe, with less than 1.15 children per woman. And here in Cheviot, there’s really only about a dozen permanent residents left, and some years up to a million tourists come through again. Italy is number two destination for tourism Europe after France itself. 

that’s really what’s been keeping the system alive. In fact, if you go through Italy as a whole, whether it’s Rome and Vatican City or Venice, these are countries that have been tourist destinations now for the better part of eight centuries. And it looks on the surface like there’s really not much hope there. The buildings date back, in some cases 2000 years. 

There was an earthquake in the 1600s that the city really had never recovered from, But that doesn’t mean they’re gone. And it doesn’t mean they’re going to be gone soon. In the case of Covid, they instituted a €5 ahead tax a few years ago, and that has made this the only tax free municipality in the entirety of Italy. 

And they’ve used that income to do things like do Geological survey’s and reforest the hillsides around them to slow the rate of decline to almost nothing. 

Yes, they’re thronged by tourists. But as you can see behind me, on the one street there really is, everybody lives on the up and the out. So in the day to day operations at home, they don’t really suffer at all. 

It’s an interesting study about how resilience is really just an exercise and reimagining what it is to be stubborn. And in the case of both Italy and Vita, we have an area that realizes by the norms of the age things don’t look very good. And so 

They’re finding ways to turn their challenges into things that allow them to survive in the way of life that they want. Which, of course brings us to the bridge. The bridge was simply an issue of stubbornness, where they decided to make the investment that was necessary to protect themselves. When geography that self tried to cut them off the bridge brought revenue, revenue bought time, time brought a strategy, and the whole place is now holding together, and everyone is fighting to maintain the way of life that they’ve all wanted all along. 

It’s a nice story, and if you ever happen to be in the area, come visit Vita. And best of all, you should really look up my buddy Marisa. He maintains a restaurant with one table, and every second you’re in there, it’s glorious.

The U.S. Gets a Taste of Corruption

Photo of a bronze trump doll on stacks of 0 bills

Trump is no stranger to helping out his cronies, but this new settlement that creates a $1.8 billion fund to compensate conservatives allegedly targeted by past Justice Department actions is a bit on the nose, even for him.

This slush fund is a reminder of the legal and regulatory erosion that the Trump administration is responsible for. The rule-of-law system that has supported the U.S. economy and government is now on some very shaky ground.

Transcript

Hey all, Peter Zeihan here. Coming to you from Vasto, Italy. Today is the 18th of May. You’ll see this later in the week. Short version is. We’ve probably had the single biggest step backward in rule of law in the United States of the second Trump term, which is, you know, saying it’s saying something in of itself. And the fact that I’m telling you this from Italy is a little concerning. 

The short version is today, the Trump administration settled a lawsuit that had brought against the US government while Trump was president. So basically Trump suing Trump and then settling with Trump to establish a slush fund of about 1.8 billion USD. Technically, it’s $1,000,000,776 million to compensate conservatives who have been prosecuted by the Justice Department in the past. Everyone who has been shortlisted to get a payout, as somebody who is one of Trump’s close political allies and in essence, this is a slush fund. 

This is the sort of operation that people in Italy have been telling you, like even the most crooked of our politicians would have never dreamed of doing something so obvious and brazen. This has a lot more in common with how Nigerian governments in recent decades have handled slush funds, basically suing yourself, controlling both sides of the negotiation, and then handing out the money to whoever you wanted to in the first place. 

Although even Nigeria has moved away from that model in the last 20 years, the most recent governments to do things like this were Nicolas Maduro of Venezuela and Hugo Chavez. This is hardly the first time the Trump administration in round two has done this. I really doubt it’ll be the last. The judge that oversaw the settlement basically said in legal terms, what the actual fuck? 

But here we are. This is what happens when you have an executive who sees the rule of law as part of the problem, rather than part of the solution. We should expect significantly more things like this. And this kind of dovetails with what has functionally happened with the tariff situation. Whereas the tariffs policies have changed so often that the only way that you can stay ahead of them is to have a really good relationship with the regulator, which is another way to say bribery. 

What was the other comparison I wanted to make? Give me a minute. It’ll come to me. Oh yeah. On the regulatory question, the Trump administration has gutted several of the regulatory bodies so that enforcement of the regulations that are on the books, even some of them from Trump, one can’t really be done in a timely manner, but they’re not bothering to staff these agencies with people who could strip out regulations from, say, the Obama or the Biden years. 

They’re just telling companies to not abide by them and put themselves in deep legal jeopardy that that a future administration might come after the before. But the Trump administration is saying, you know, all you have to do is not follow the law in its current form, and we’re not going to prosecute you. So it’s breaking down the rule of law that allows us business to be the most dynamic in the world. 

And basically following a model that the Russians had during the 1990s and the 2000, where you deliberately have conflicting guidance from the Kremlin and from law and from regulation, and the only way to stay on the positive side of that is to bribe everyone in sight. So mazel tov from Italy, a country that used to be run this way but found a different way.

Taking Naval Options Away from China

A Chinese Naval chip in harbor

There were some recent tests in the Philippines involving the Japanese Type-88 anti-ship missile system and the U.S. Typhon launcher. These truck-mounted systems can move throughout the islands, rather than relying on fixed bases.

Deploying these systems across the first island chain would limit China’s naval access to the wider Pacific. We’re also seeing Japan step into a new era of defense policy, reflected by a broader regional effort to contain Chinese naval power.

Transcript

Hey all. Peter Zeihan here, coming to you from Queta in Umbria in Italy today. We’re talking about a couple of events that happened in the Asian rim in the Philippines specifically last week. We had two test fires of weapon systems. First, the Japanese launch something called a type 88 anti-ship missile. And the United States launched something from what’s called a typhoon. 

Excuse me, typhoon launcher, which is basically a tomahawk, those long range cruise missiles the US is famous or infamous for, based on whether you’re target or not. Both of them launched from the Philippines. Both of these are truck mounted systems. The Chinese threw a bit of a shit fit, but there’s really not a lot they can do about them. 

The issue is two things. Number one, the first island chain, which is the line of islands including Japan, the Philippines, Taiwan, Malaysia and Indonesia, they’re all at least nominal US allies. But more to the point, they block the Chinese from accessing the wider world unless these nations allow it. What are the things that has held up during the Cold War? 

The post-Cold War era is that the United States has not reinforced the first island chain, because during the Cold War, China was an ally against the Soviet Union. And it’s only in the last couple of decades that that has really changed in the last few years, where they’ve become outright hostile, which means that we are now in the early stages of fortifying the island chain, not just the United States, but the countries in question. 

Because if you can install weapons systems that can hit ships, then the Chinese are permanently locked into the lake that is the west side of the the island chain. And now that is happening. Second, like I say, we have three things. Second, the weapon systems involved are truck launched. So you don’t even need a fixed installation. The Typhon Tomahawk launcher, you know, has the range of a normal tomahawk, which can be pushing 1500 miles. 

And the type 88 is shorter. It’s actually an older system that only has a rate of about 100 miles. But they have newer systems that they haven’t just put into place in the area right now. But you take the Philippines, which is one of the most erratic, probably the best word countries in the region with the lowest military capability. 

You have a bunch of trucks running around, some driven by the Japanese, some driven by US Marines, and all of a sudden everything within several hundred miles of the archipelago is completely no go for Chinese vessels. And that’s before you consider more capable states such as, say, Taiwan. So these two weapon systems are basically enough to completely castrate the entire Chinese military position. 

So of course the Chinese are kind of losing their minds. Third thing, this is the first time that Japan has tested an offensive weapon system outside of home islands since World War two. 

Japanese were forced by the United States in the aftermath of the war to have permanent neutrality, and that is now rapidly eroding away. And if you take a country that has the second most capable navy in the planet, you allow them to start stationing military assets outside of their country. And it doesn’t matter, really, what the relationship with the United States happens to be. The Chinese aren’t going anywhere. So we’ve now had a very, very clear example of what can happen with these new systems or even old systems. 

Something to keep in mind. There are a number of countries in the world that, operating all by themselves, that have the ability to completely destroy the Chinese economy because they can interfere with any sort of corporate shipping. China is the most dependent country in the world on globalization because they import a lot of their food, they import the inputs they need to grow their own food. 

They import the raw materials they need to make their manufactured goods, and then they have to export the manufactured goods to pay for it all. You interrupt the sea lanes and it all falls apart. So Japan and the United States obviously have the direct naval power to do that whenever they want to. Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia do, because they control the straits that allow the Chinese access Middle Eastern crude and European end markets. 

The Australians have weapon systems that can reach that entire zone as well. And now the freaking Philippines has a bunch of dudes running around on trucks that are getting weapons systems so that they can do it to the degree to which the Chinese are in a box here is immense. So it really doesn’t matter from my point of view, what happens with demographics or relations with the United States or globalization in general? 

Every time you look at this from a fresh angle, the Chinese are screwed and the state media really realizes that, which is why they’re having such an outrage rejection of what’s going on right now. And the Japanese side, this is barely even talked about. They’re just kind of sneaking in the background. Anyway, that’s it for me for today. Until next time.

Latvia’s Political Flux Caused by Drones

Photo of a military drone

Latvia’s government is in flux following the firing of the defense minister, his party leaving the coalition, and the prime minister resigning. All of this was caused by some Ukrainian drones being electronically redirected by Russian countermeasures and striking Latvian infrastructure.

This specific event involving Latvia highlights just how quickly drone technology is evolving. The Ukraine War has been a testing ground for all of it, and several countries are now partnering with Ukraine to mass-produce Ukrainian drone technology. The U.S. is not on that list of countries and will likely fall behind the eight ball on the drone front.

Transcript

Hey all, Peter Zeihan here, coming to you from Umbria in Italy. Olives. Because, you know, Italy today we’re talking about a little nonstandard thing about a government falling in Europe. Now, there’s 30 odd governments in Europe, and one of them is always in crisis. So I usually don’t follow the blow by blow. But this one’s really interesting, Prime Minister. 

Let’s see if I get this right. You silly. Is the Prime Minister was the Prime minister of Latvia, which is one of the three Baltic countries population of about 2.5 million. She resigned this past week over a defense crisis. The situation has to do with drone technology and the Ukraine war. So specifically the Ukrainians have been using drones more recently, new types of drones to attack various chunks of Russia’s energy sector and trying to destroy the logistics support that makes Russia’s participation in the Ukraine war possible. 

So they’ve been very active around places like Mariupol in going after logistics. They’ve been very active in places like the Black Sea and the Baltic Sea in going after energy assets. Now there are multiple types of drones, but let’s talk about two. So in the first one you’ve got something called an FPG first person visual. And that’s your typical drone that you might buy from a company like say DJI in in China you have a controller. 

Sometimes it’s on your phone, you require a digital tether to it and you send it off. And if something interrupts that tether, the drone just goes in a straight line or crashes or returns to you based on its programing. Option number two is something called a GPS drone, for lack of a better phrase. There’s lots of subtypes here, and it follows GPS coordinates that you kind of lay down like a breadcrumb. 

And it goes from point to point to point to point to point. And then when it gets to its end destination, it either crashes into the last point you gave it. It takes a quick glance around and makes a decision as to what to hit. Now, with this second type of drone, you don’t need a digital tether to it, but it does need to be able to receive a signal from a satellite or some other sort of signal that allows it to know where it is. 

So cell towers, for example, work. So if you can jam that signal, the drone then flies off into the night or crashes or return homes based on its programing, what it’s capable of doing. And it might have a little bit of buffer, so you might have to jam it for more than, say, 30 to 60s in order to make sure you really wreck it. 

But within this type of drones, that requires on external signals for guidance, not from the controller, from something else. With good enough electronic warfare, you can convince it that it’s somewhere else and flying somewhere else and basically give it new targeting instructions. And that appears to be what has happened in the Latvian situation. So last week, well, last month actually, what went down is the Ukrainians started doing more and more and more attacks that the Russians were starting to twist the instructions. 

And some of these drones were bent back into the Baltic states and at least on two occasions, were actually able to successfully target Latvian energy infrastructure, specifically fuel tanks. And so there was a spat among the coalition partners in the Latvian government. The prime minister is from one party, the defense minister is from another party. The defense minister was fired, the Defense Ministers Party pulled out of the coalition that kept the prime minister in office. 

It’s a whole to do in Latvia with, you know, 2.5 million people. Doesn’t take much people to have a whole to do. And now the government is in flux and were trying to figure it out. They need to have a new government or just have new elections. They were already scheduled for October. So from a big point of view, it’s not really there from a political issue, but from a military issue. 

It shows the ongoing evolution of drones, because if the Russians can somewhat reliably undermine this class of drones, then the Ukrainians have no choice but to stop using them. Now, I would argue that Ukrainians are well on their way to that point. Remember I mentioned that one of the subsets of these drones are ones that when they reach their final target coordinates, they can look around and make a decision that is already a significant step up from what the Russians can do. 

And if you just up the amount of memory you have in the drone that’s capable of doing that just a little bit, then all of a sudden it doesn’t need that external signal. It can follow geographic landmarks like mountains or buildings or roads, and then it doesn’t have to have a signal. And so there’s nothing to jam. And we’ve already seen the Ukrainians start to introduce drones like that, just not across the board. 

So as with everything with Ukraine war, there is an ongoing tug and war between attack and defense and attack and defense and attack and defense. It’s way too early to know how it’s going to turn out. But what I can tell you two things. Number one, in the last two and a half months, the Ukrainians have introduced more models of drones with more active internal decision making capacity than the Russians have in the entirety of the war. 

To this point. They’re also have launched more drones day on day for the last two months than the Russians have, even though the Russians have bottomless supplies of Chinese parts. So we really have turned the corner where the Ukrainian pre-war defense base, which is where the Soviet Union got its rocketry and its aerospace stuff, has really come into its own and now surpassed what the Russians can do. 

Number two, the Ukrainians are no longer alone because the Trump administration is looking for fresh ways to shit the bed. With all of the allies in Europe and the Middle East, we now have a dozen countries, ranging from Poland and Sweden and Germany, the United Emirates and Qatar and Saudi Arabia, who are actively building out physical infrastructure in partnership with Ukrainians to mass produce Ukrainian drones for their own use and for Ukraine as well. 

So if you fast forward this to the end of the summer, the volume of drones at the Ukrainians are likely to be able to bring to bear is just going to dwarf what the Russians can do, and they will be more technologically advanced. Now, under normal circumstances, I would say that’s going to change the nature of the war. 

Of course, it’s going to change the nature of the war, but it would probably turn the tide. But keep in mind that this is a fresh technological revolution. I didn’t see this coming three months ago to project three months for and say, this is how it’s going to go. It would be really stupid of me. All I can tell you is that the pace of this is overwhelming. 

What we understand aerospace, what we understand, automation, what we understand war to be. And we’re about to have some crazy stuff happen in calendar year 2026, as all of this comes to a head in multiple theaters. Because keep in mind, just because the Ukrainians are succeeding at this doesn’t mean the Russians can’t try. And we’ve already seen some kernels of this sort of technology in play in Iran recently. 

This technology will go global, and at the moment, the country that’s at the back of the line to kind of play with the technologies, the United States, because the Trump administration doesn’t like the president of Ukraine.